Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Am I abusing backticks?
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Am I abusing backticks? Post 302323166 by Corona688 on Friday 5th of June 2009 03:11:21 PM
Old 06-05-2009
I might write:
Code:
stripscriptname=$(sed 's/\(.*\)\..*/\1/' <<< "$scriptname")
stripsearch=$(tr -d ' ,/' <<< "$searchpattern")

I think avoiding the echo cuts out one extra process, builtin or not.

Is the purpose of your sed search string to strip off any string beginning with dot from the end of the string? It might work faster(and more portably, since it needs no backreferences) to just match and delete the portion you don't want without matching the part you want to keep:
Code:
sed 's/\..*//'

Some shells, like bash 3 and newer, support built-in regular expressions without resort to sed.
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Perl - backticks v system in if statements

Can someone explain the difference between backticks and system when evaluated in these if statements: sub getDate { print "start date\n"; if ( system("/bin/date") ) { print "can't get date\n"; exit(2); } print "finish date\n"; } Returns the following: start date Thu... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: gjkeenan
5 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Backticks within backticks?

Hi, I'm trying to do something like this: range= `expr `date '+%m'` - 1` and it does not work. How can I tell it to evaluate an expression within another expression evaluation? I was at first worried that `date '+%m'` would return a string but apparently expr does the math okay normally, so the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jeriryan87
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Difference between using xargs and backticks

Hey all. Just a fast question, what is the technical difference between using back ticks and using xargs to perform a command? Here's an example Find /mydir -name *.conf |xargs rm Vs Rm 'find /mydir -name *.conf' Is there a performance hit? I know they do the same thing but which is... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: msarro
1 Replies

4. Red Hat

perl backticks: can't redirect output.

Hi everyone. This is a bit of a perl/linux mixed question. I am trying to redirect STDOUT of chsh by using the following line of perl code. system ("chsh -s /sbin/nologin $testing 1>/dev/null"); This should redirect STDOUT to /dev/null but it won't do that for some odd reason. Any ideas or... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: austinharris43
6 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with remove backticks in a text file

Input file: 'data_1' 'data_10' 'data1311' '235data_13' Desired output: data_1 data_10 data1311 235data_13 Can I know how to remove back tick"'" in a file? Many thanks for advice. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: perl_beginner
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

SSH and Backticks [solved]

I have been testing a new script and cannot figure out why my `cat spath` will not execute on the remote machine? sudo ssh -p 22344 -o "PasswordAuthentication no" -o "HostbasedAuthentication yes" -l testuser 192.168.1.6 "find `cat spath` -depth" cat: spath: No such file or directory but... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: metallica1973
0 Replies

7. Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems

Trouble Registering? Countries or Regions Abusing Forums

The forums have been seeing a sharp increase in spam bots, forum robots, and malicious registrations from certain countries. If you have been directed to this thread due to a "No Permission Error" when trying to register please post in this thread and request permission to register, including... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Neo
1 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Nesting backticks

I'm trying to make a dialog window that prints the output of grep that takes the output of find. Unfortunately my nested backticks don't work. Here is the dialog window: dialog --stdout --title "test" --backtitle "test" --msgbox "Test:\n `grep -l "${tablica}" `find $string``" 16 60I think I... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Starting_Leaf
2 Replies
TRS(1)								Linux User's Manual							    TRS(1)

NAME
trs - filter replacing strings SYNOPSIS
trs [-[r]e] 'REPLACE_THIS WITH_THAT [AND_THIS WITH_THAT]...' trs [-[r]f] FILE DESCRIPTION
Copy stdin to stdout replacing every occurence of given strings with other ones. This is similar to tr(1), but replaces strings, not only single chars. Rules (separated by whitespace) can be given directly after -e option, or can be read from FILE. Argument not preceded by -e or -f is guessed to be a script when it contains some whitespace, or a filename otherwise. Comments are allowed from # until the end of line. The character # in strings must be specified as #. Standard C-like escapes a  e f v \ nn are recognized. In addition, s means a space character and ! means an empty string. Sets of acceptable characters at a given position can be specified between [ and ]. ASCII ranges in sets can be shortly written as FIRST-LAST. When a set consists of only a single range, [ and ] can be omitted. When a part of the string to translate is enclosed in {...}, only that part is replaced. Any text outside {...} serves as an assertion: a string is translated only if it is preceded by the given text and followed by another one. { at the beginning or } at the end of the string can be omitted. Text outside {...} is treated as untranslated. Before the beginning of the file and after its end there are only 's. Thus, for example, {.} matches . on a line by itself, including the first line, and the last one even without the marker. A fragment of the form ?x=N, where x is a letter A-Za-z and N is a digit 0-9, contained in the target text sets the variable x to the value N when that rule succeeds. Similar fragment in the source text causes the given rule to be considered only if that variable has such value. Initially all variables have the value of 0. Several assignments or conditions can be present in one rule - they are ANDed together. OPTIONS -e Give the translation rules directly in the command line. -f Get them from the file specified. -r Reverse every rule. This affects only the next -e or -f option. Of course this doesn't have to give the reverse translation! Any rule containing any of {}[]{}- is taken in only one direction. You may force any rule to be taken in only one direction by enclosing the string to translate in {...}. --help display help and exit --version output version information and exit Multiple -e or -f options are allowed. All rules are loaded together then, and earlier ones have precedence. EXAMPLE
$ echo Leeloo |trs -e 'el n e i i aqq o} x o u' Linux DIFFERENCES FROM sed The main difference between trs and sed 's///g; ...' (excluding sed's regular expressions) is that sed takes every rule in the order speci- fied and applies it to the whole line of translated file, whereas trs examines every position and tries all rules in this place first. In sed every next rule is fed with the text produced by the previous one, whereas in trs every piece of text can be translated at most once (if more than one rule matches at a given position, the one mentioned earlier wins). That's why sed isn't well suited for translating between character sets. On the other hand, tr translates only single bytes, so it can't be used for Unicode conversions, or TeX / SGML ways for specifying extended characters. Another example: $ echo 642 |trs -e '4 7 72 66 64 4' 42 $ echo 642 |sed 's/4/7/g; s/72/66/g; s/64/4/g' 666 The string to replace can be empty; there must be something outside {} then. In this special case only one such create-from-nothing rule can success at a given position. For example, }x80-xFF @ precedes every character with high byte set with @. The rule of the form some{ thing doesn't work at the end of a file. SEE ALSO
tr(1), konwert(1) COPYRIGHT
trs is a filter replacing strings. It forms part of the konwert package. Copyright (c) 1998 Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MER- CHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA AUTHOR
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak@knm.org.pl http://qrczak.home.ml.org/ \__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a21 C+++>+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E->++ ^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP->+ t QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y- Konwert 12 Jul 1998 TRS(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy