Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: raidctl performance issues
Operating Systems Solaris raidctl performance issues Post 302322463 by incredible on Wednesday 3rd of June 2009 11:12:18 PM
Old 06-04-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by skamal4u
sometime when one drive fails we dont face any issue & we replace the drive with out any problem . but sometimes when one drive fails , system becomes unresponsive and doesnot allow us to login
Why is that so? Definitely the systems you have at large are of different models and architecture.
You must check if there's any firmware bug with with and if your's is updated to the latest.
Slot 0 and slot 1 can be used for the OS disks.you can even RAID slot 0 with 2 or 3. It doesn't really matter as long as you raidctl the correct controller/target

-----Post Update-----

And how do you usually confirm if a drive fails, in a h/w raid?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

shell script performance issues --Urgent

I need help in awk please help immediatly. This below function is taking lot of time Please help me to fine tune it so that it runs faster. The file count is around 3million records # Process Body processbody() { #set -x while read line do ... (18 Replies)
Discussion started by: icefish
18 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Awk Performance Issues

Hi All, I'm facing an issue in my awk script. The script is processing a large text file having the details of a number of persons, each person's details being written from 100 to 250 tags as given below: 100 START| 101klklk| ... 245 opr| 246 55| 250 END| 100 START| ... 245 pp| 246... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pgp_acc1
4 Replies

3. Programming

performance issues of calling a function in if condition

Hi, I have written a program in C and have to test the return value of the functions. So the normal way of doin this wud b int rc rc=myfunction(input); if(rc=TRUE){ } else{ } But instead of doing this I have called the function in the if() condition. Does this have any... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sidmania
2 Replies

4. Solaris

Solaris 11 Express NAT performance issues

Hi all, I decided to replace my linux router/firewall with Solaris 11 express. This is a pppoe connection directly to my server...no router boxes. I got everything setup, but the performance is terrible on the NAT....really slow. A web page that loads on the server instantly will take... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: vectox
3 Replies

5. AIX

Performance issues for LPAR with GPFS 3.4

Hi, We have GPFS 3.4 Installed on two AIX 6.1 Nodes. We have 3 GPFS Mount points: /abc01 4TB (Comprises of 14 x 300GB disks from XIV SAN) /abc02 4TB (Comprises of 14 x 300GB disks from XIV SAN) /abc03 1TB ((Comprises of Multiple 300GB disks from XIV SAN) Now these 40... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aixromeo
1 Replies

6. Solaris

zfs send receive performance issues

I 'm trying to clone a zfs file system pool/u01 to a new file system called newpool/u01 using following commands zfs list zfs snapshot pool/u01@new zfs send pool/u01@new | zfs -F receive newpool/u01 Its a 100G file system snapshot and copied to same server on different pool and... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: fugitive
9 Replies

7. Solaris

Getcwd performance issues

Hello everyone, recently we have been experiencing performance issues with chmod. We managed to narrow it down to getcwd. The following folder exists: /Folder1/subfol1/subfol2/subfol3 cd /Folder1/subfol1/subfol2/subfol3 truss -D pwd 2>&1 | grep getcwd 0.0001... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: KotekBury
4 Replies

8. AIX

AIX 6.1 Memory Performance issues

Good Day Everyone, Just wonder anyone has encounter AIX 6.1 Memory Performance issues ? What I have in my current scenario is we have 3 datastage servers (Segregate server and EE jobs - for those who know Datastage achitect) and 2 db servers(running HA to load balance 4 nodes partitions for... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ckwan
3 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Hard Disk Performance issues Suse 11 SP1

hi guys right now I have 6 Virtual Machines (VMs) running on Vmware ESXi 5.1 and attached to Storage SAN. All these run Suse Linux 11 SP1 x64. All of a sudden 1 of these VMs is running very slow making high CPU usage and I see al wait % kinda high 40-50%. Apparently since I don't own this... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: karlochacon
5 Replies

10. What is on Your Mind?

Baiduspider and Forum Performance Issues

For years we blocked Baiduspider due to the fact their bots do not obey the robots.txt directive and can really hurt site performance when they unleash 100 bots on the site each pulling pages many times per second. Last year, I unblocked Baiduspider's IP addresses, and now the problem is back. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Neo
1 Replies
CD(9)							   BSD Kernel Developer's Manual						     CD(9)

NAME
cd -- CDROM driver for the CAM SCSI subsystem DESCRIPTION
The cd device driver provides a read only interface for CDROM drives (SCSI type 5) and WORM drives (SCSI type 4) that support CDROM type com- mands. Some drives do not behave as the driver expects. See the QUIRKS section for information on possible flags. QUIRKS
Each CD-ROM device can have different interpretations of the SCSI spec. This can lead to drives requiring special handling in the driver. The following is a list of quirks that the driver recognize. CD_Q_NO_TOUCH This flag tell the driver not to probe the drive at attach time to see if there is a disk in the drive and find out what size it is. This flag is currently unimplemented in the CAM cd driver. CD_Q_BCD_TRACKS This flag is for broken drives that return the track numbers in packed BCD instead of straight decimal. If the drive seems to skip tracks (tracks 10-15 are skipped) then you have a drive that is in need of this flag. CD_Q_NO_CHANGER This flag tells the driver that the device in question is not a changer. This is only necessary for a CDROM device with multiple luns that are not a part of a changer. CD_Q_CHANGER This flag tells the driver that the given device is a multi-lun changer. In general, the driver will figure this out auto- matically when it sees a LUN greater than 0. Setting this flag only has the effect of telling the driver to run the initial read capacity command for LUN 0 of the changer through the changer scheduling code. CD_Q_10_BYTE_ONLY This flag tells the driver that the given device only accepts 10 byte MODE SENSE/MODE SELECT commands. In general these types of quirks should not be added to the cd(4) driver. The reason is that the driver does several things to attempt to determine whether the drive in question needs 10 byte commands. First, it issues a CAM Path Inquiry command to determine whether the protocol that the drive speaks typically only allows 10 byte commands. (ATAPI and USB are two prominent exam- ples of protocols where you generally only want to send 10 byte commands.) Then, if it gets an ILLEGAL REQUEST error back from a 6 byte MODE SENSE or MODE SELECT command, it attempts to send the 10 byte version of the command instead. The only reason you would need a quirk is if your drive uses a protocol (e.g., SCSI) that typically does not have a problem with 6 byte commands. FILES
/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_cd.c is the driver source file. SEE ALSO
cd(4), scsi(4) HISTORY
The cd manual page first appeared in FreeBSD 2.2. AUTHORS
This manual page was written by John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org>. It was updated for CAM and FreeBSD 3.0 by Kenneth Merry <ken@FreeBSD.org>. BSD
September 2, 2003 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy