Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming How to get the sizeof char pointer Post 302322235 by pludi on Wednesday 3rd of June 2009 07:24:19 AM
Old 06-03-2009
First, please use [code][/code] where applicable
Code:
using namespace std;
static void cstrCopy(char *x, const char *y);
int main()
{
    char x[19];
    const string y = "UNIX FORUM";
    cstrCopy(x, y.c_str());
    return 0;
}
void cstrCopy(char *x, const char *y)
{
    if (strlen(y) >= sizeof(x)) {
        throw errorException;
    }
    strncpy(x, y, sizeof(x));
}

Second, a C "string" has no information about itself. It's just an array of characters, which is terminated by a null byte by convention. This also means that your two calls to sizeof will always return 4 (size of a pointer). Better add another parameter with the size of the array.
A more intelligent solution would be to malloc() the "C string" in your function, strncpy() the contents of y, and return the pointer to that memory area.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

sizeof

we know that sizeof never returns zero when used with structure then why in this case it is returning zero struct foo { char c; }; void main() { struct foo f; cout<<sizeof(f); } i am working on solaris 5.8 isn't the above function should return the size of empty structure (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ramneek
7 Replies

2. Programming

Regarding char Pointer

Hi, char *s="yamaha"; cout<<s<<endl; int *p; int i=10; p=&i; cout<<p<<endl; 1) For the 1st "cout" we will get "yamaha" as output. That is we are getting "content of the address" for cout<<s. 2) But for integer "cout<<p" we are getting the "address only". Please clarify how we are... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sweta
2 Replies

3. Programming

Adding a single char to a char pointer.

Hello, I'm trying to write a method which will return the extension of a file given the file's name, e.g. test.txt should return txt. I'm using C so am limited to char pointers and arrays. Here is the code as I have it: char* getext(char *file) { char *extension; int i, j;... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: pallak7
5 Replies

4. Programming

pass a pointer-to-pointer, or return a pointer?

If one wants to get a start address of a array or a string or a block of memory via a function, there are at least two methods to achieve it: (1) one is to pass a pointer-to-pointer parameter, like: int my_malloc(int size, char **pmem) { *pmem=(char *)malloc(size); if(*pmem==NULL)... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: aaronwong
11 Replies

5. Programming

sizeof an array of structure without using 'sizeof' operator

Hi All, is it possible to find out the size of an array of structures ( without using 'sizeof' operator). The condition is we have the array of structure instant but we are not aware of the elements inside the structure. Can someone help me out? Thanks in advance. (18 Replies)
Discussion started by: rvan
18 Replies

6. Programming

Doubts regarding sizeof() operator

Hi, There are some bewildering sizeof() questions I have in my mind. Could anyone shed some light on this? int main() { printf("%d\n", sizeof(main)); // Ans: 1 } That is, the sizeof() a function identifier though it is treated internally as a pointer gives 1 byte always, why? ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
5 Replies

7. Programming

sizeof(object) in C++

Hi, I have defined the class and call the sizeof(object to class) to get the size. # include <iostream> # include <iomanip> using namespace std; class sample { private: int i; float j; char k; public: sample() { } (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ramkrix
2 Replies

8. Programming

help with char pointer array in C

i have an array like #define NUM 8 .... new_socket_fd = accept(socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *) &cli_addr, &client_length); char *items = {"one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight"}; char *item_name_length = {"3", "3", "5", "4", "4", "3", "5", "5"}; ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: omega666
1 Replies

9. Programming

Compiler/Runtime uses of sizeof

Ignoring other considerations for a moment and in general ... Would there be a difference in result (dot oh or execution) of: A. strncpy( a, b, sizeof(a) ); vs. B. c = sizeof(a); strncpy( a, b, c ); My general understanding is (at least I think my understanding is) that... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: GSalisbury
10 Replies

10. Programming

Segmentation fault when I pass a char pointer to a function in C.

I am passing a char* to the function "reverse" and when I execute it with gdb I get: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000000000040083b in reverse (s=0x400b2b "hello") at pointersExample.c:72 72 *q = *p; Attached is the source code. I do not understand why... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: jose_spain
9 Replies
ggstrlcpy(3)								GGI							      ggstrlcpy(3)

NAME
ggstrlcpy, ggstrlcat - size-bounded string copying and concatenation SYNOPSIS
#include <ggi/gg.h> size_t ggstrlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t siz); size_t ggstrlcat(char *dst, const char *src, size_t siz); DESCRIPTION
The ggstrlcpy and ggstrlcat functions copy and concatenate strings respectively. They are designed to be safer, more consistent, and less error prone replacements for strncpy(3) and strncat(3). Unlike those functions, ggstrlcpy and ggstrlcat take the full size of the buffer (not just the length) and guarantee to NUL-terminate the result (as long as size is larger than 0 or, in the case of ggstrlcat, as long as there is at least one byte free in dst). Note that you should include a byte for the NUL in size. Also note that ggstrlcpy and ggstrlcat only operate on true C strings. This means that for ggstrlcpy src must be NUL-terminated and for ggstrlcat both src and dst must be NUL- terminated. The ggstrlcpy function copies up to siz - 1 characters from the NUL-terminated string src to dst, NUL-terminating the result. The ggstrlcat function appends the NUL-terminated string src to the end of dst. It will append at most siz - strlen(dst) - 1 bytes, NUL- terminating the result. RETURN VALUES
The ggstrlcpy and ggstrlcat functions return the total length of the string they tried to create. For ggstrlcpy that means the length of src. For ggstrlcat that means the initial length of dst plus the length of src. While this may seem somewhat confusing it was done to make truncation detection simple. Note however, that if ggstrlcat traverses size characters without finding a NUL, the length of the string is considered to be size and the destination string will not be NUL-terminated (since there was no space for the NUL). This keeps ggstrlcat from running off the end of a string. In practice this should not happen (as it means that either size is incorrect or that dst is not a proper C string). The check exists to prevent potential security problems in incorrect code. EXAMPLES
The following code fragment illustrates the simple case: char *s, *p, buf[BUFSIZ]; ... (void)ggstrlcpy(buf, s, sizeof(buf)); (void)ggstrlcat(buf, p, sizeof(buf)); To detect truncation, perhaps while building a pathname, something like the following might be used: char *dir, *file, pname[MAXPATHLEN]; ... if (ggstrlcpy(pname, dir, sizeof(pname)) >= sizeof(pname)) goto toolong; if (ggstrlcat(pname, file, sizeof(pname)) >= sizeof(pname)) goto toolong; Since we know how many characters we copied the first time, we can speed things up a bit by using a copy instead of an append: char *dir, *file, pname[MAXPATHLEN]; size_t n; ... n = ggstrlcpy(pname, dir, sizeof(pname)); if (n >= sizeof(pname)) goto toolong; if (ggstrlcpy(pname + n, file, sizeof(pname) - n) >= sizeof(pname) - n) goto toolong; However, one may question the validity of such optimizations, as they defeat the whole purpose of ggstrlcpy and ggstrlcat. SEE ALSO
snprintf(3) strncat(3) strncpy(3) HISTORY
strlcpy and strlcat first appeared in OpenBSD 2.4, then in NetBSD 1.4.3 and FreeBSD 3.3.0. ggstrlcpy and ggstrlcat has been added to libgg for portability. libgg-1.0.x 2005-08-26 ggstrlcpy(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy