05-20-2009
I tried with hscroot but i have still the same problem. Maybe problem is with version of HMC. Could you tell me which version and patch you have (on which version is working)?
It's very strange because i can see Manage systems, but i can't open list with LPARs . The same problem is when I'm trying to create new task role. I can see WUI Permission, but i can't open this list.
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. AIX
Can anyone tell me why its a bad idea to have rootvg span multiple physical drives
i.e.
hdisk0 00014861356a3c77 rootvg
hdisk1 0001486111354c7c rootvg
hdisk2 00014861fcef6a5d rootvg
hdisk3 none None
thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: csaunders
1 Replies
2. What is on Your Mind?
In any given operating system, generally how much of AI software is involved? Is it related to user-friendliness of OS?
What is the future of strong AI? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: MULTIVERSE
3 Replies
3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
I having problem with my linux machine
it have 6Gb physical memory and somehow it always almost coming to the bottom neck and than it start writing to the swap memory
you can see that there is more than 4G in cahce, is there any way to clean the cache or to limit it to 2Gb?
host1... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Igal Malka
6 Replies
4. IP Networking
I need help, how to set traffic management on the ubuntu server with the real life situation.
For example, I would like to set the lowest priority or the "Best-Effort Traffic" for the ports in the range from 35000-37000 only on the TX(transmit) and I would like that same port range has... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: loopdemack
1 Replies
5. Red Hat
Hi guys.
I have configured Vsftpd with virtual users using Berkley DB. it is running fine. But how can we implement disk quotas for virtual users? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: majid.merkava
1 Replies
6. Solaris
Hi gurus,
Please advice me in case such a process is taking too much of memory what are the necessary steps we need to do. Please explain with detailed.
Thanks | P.Bharathiraja:confused: (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bharathiraja
3 Replies
7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello Folks
so i have a question,
we have about 1000 linux machines in our org and would like to be able to manage all of them,
what type of software would i use, any suggestions?
i heard of puppet,
what else do we have available? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hookitup
1 Replies
8. UNIX and Linux Applications
Hi Experts,
I have question regarding linux cluster managment on Red Hat 5.x server. When I try to install 'luci' or 'ricci' in one of our linux servers it is giving me below error:-
yum install luci
Loaded plugins: katello, product-id, rhnplugin, security, subscription-manager
Updating... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Amey Joshi
0 Replies
9. Solaris
Hi all
I need to run a command that only a role user and root can run, I need to run that command remotely by script but the roles ask for a password.
Ex. from serverA with userA to serverB with userB:
userA can ssh serverB using userB without askink for a password.
ssh userB@serverB... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: juanramos100
3 Replies
LEARN ABOUT MOJAVE
moosex::role::parameterized::extending
MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Extending(3) User Contributed Perl Documentation MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Extending(3)
NAME
MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Extending - extending MooseX::Role::Parameterized roles
DESCRIPTION
There are heaps of useful modules in the "MooseX" namespace that you can use to make your roles more powerful. However, they do not always
work out of the box with MooseX::Role::Parameterized, but it's fairly straight-forward to achieve the functionality you desire.
MooseX::Role::Parameterized was designed to be as extensible as the rest of Moose, and as such it is possible to apply custom traits to
both the parameterizable role or the ordinary roles they generate. In this example, we will look at applying the fake trait
"MooseX::MagicRole" to a parameterizable role.
First we need to define a new metaclass for our parameterizable role.
package MyApp::Meta::Role::Parameterizable;
use Moose;
extends 'MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterizable';
with 'MooseX::MagicRole';
This is a class (observe that it uses Moose, not Moose::Role) which extends the class which governs parameterizable roles.
MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterizable is the metaclass that packages using MooseX::Role::Parameterized receive by
default.
Note that the class we are extending, MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterizable, is entirely distinct from the similarly-
named class which governs the ordinary roles that parameterized roles generate. An instance of
MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Meta::Role::Parameterized represents a role with its parameters already bound.
Now we can take advantage of our new subclass by specifying that we want to use "MyApp::Meta::Role::Parameterizable" as our metaclass when
importing MooseX::Role::Parameterized:
package MyApp::Role;
use MooseX::Role::Parameterized -metaclass => 'MyApp::Meta::Role::Parameterizable';
role {
...
}
And there you go! "MyApp::Role" now has the "MooseX::MagicRole" trait applied.
perl v5.18.2 2012-08-14 MooseX::Role::Parameterized::Extending(3)