05-14-2009
Hi
I thought that what ever route host statement you've manually added, ipmp would use this host to `ping` when deciding to failover. So, on the network, find 3 hosts that you can create a direct link into within your routing table and use those. E.g.
# Copyright (c) 2003 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
# All rights reserved.
#
#ident "@(#)staticroutes 1.0.1
#
# Edit the following IPMP test TARGETS to suit your needs.
# To install:
# 1) cp S70staticroutes to /etc/rc2.d
# 2) perform edits on the script as required
# 3) chmod 744 /etc/rc2.d/S70staticroutes
# 4) chown root:sys /etc/rc2.d/S70staticroutes
# 5) ln /etc/rc2.d/S70staticroutes /etc/init.d/staticroutes
#
TARGET1=148.253.132.10
TARGET2=148.253.132.11
case "$1" in
'start')
/usr/bin/echo "Adding static routes for IPMP ..."
/usr/sbin/route add host $TARGET1 $TARGET1
/usr/sbin/route add host $TARGET2 $TARGET2
;;
'stop')
/usr/bin/echo "Deleting static routes for IPMP ..."
/usr/sbin/route delete host $TARGET1 $TARGET1
/usr/sbin/route delete host $TARGET2 $TARGET2
;;
SBK
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
1 Replies
3. IP Networking
I have some linux machines that I am trying to increase the throughput to on a single connection. They connect to a switch with two 1GbE lines and the switch does not have Link Aggregation support for these machines. I have tried bonding with balance-rr, balance-alb, but the machines can only... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Eruditass
4 Replies
4. AIX
Hi,
I need to setup a hacmp cluster (my first one, we usually use VCS on AIX), but I require more network bandwith than a normal gigabit etherchannel setup can provide, so I am thinking about using linkaggregation - 2 active adapters to one switch and a single backup adapter to another switch... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: zxmaus
4 Replies
5. HP-UX
Hi,
Hoping someone can offer some advice on something i have not dealt with before.
We have a server that seems to have some very strange configuration done on it. It has 2 physical NIC's and rather than both be aggregated into LAN900 we have 1 in LAN900 and 1 in LAN901? (See Below)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andyp2704
2 Replies
6. Solaris
Me again :)
I'm trying to find a page describing the L2, L3 und L4 modes of dladm.
It's nice to read "hashed by ip header", but how should I use that?
On the file-server it's ok to have the six interfaces serving six clients each on it's own. But an rsync connection via switch between two... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: PatrickBaer
8 Replies
7. HP-UX
Hi,
I want to Break the Link Aggregation. My aggregation are lan0+lan1 = lan900.
Now I want to break this and put the IP in lan0. But i have cluster environment and this is the main database server.
So It need to change in cluster script.
But I dont know where I have to change it.
Please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mkiron
1 Replies
8. Solaris
Hi,
I'm not from the Solaris world and some of these things are new to me. Can someone tell me if it is possible to configure link aggregation without using LACP?
I am told etherchannel was setup without LACP. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: techy1
3 Replies
9. IP Networking
Hi
ihave three link of internet and iwant to put one linux front of a firewall that this three linux speard firewall such az load balance and fialover but dont close any port and protocol and only firewall have been internet what way can i use for it ?
are there any script and services do that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mnnn
0 Replies
10. Solaris
Hi,
I have Solaris-10 server and link aggregation is configured on this in below way
# dladm show-aggr
key: 1 (0x0001) policy: L4 address: 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a (auto)
device address speed duplex link state
bnx1 3c:d9:2b:ee:a8:a... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: solaris_1977
8 Replies
route(8c) route(8c)
Name
route - manually manipulate the routing tables
Syntax
/etc/route [ -f ] [ -n ] command args ]
Description
The program is used to manipulate the network routing tables manually. However, normally it is not needed, as the system routing table
management daemon, should tend to this task.
The program accepts two commands: add, to add a route and delete, to delete a route.
All commands have the following syntax:
/etc/route command [ net | host ] destination gateway [ metric ]
In this syntax, destination is a host or network for which the route is to, gateway is the gateway to which packets should be addressed,
and metric is an optional count indicating the number of hops to the destination. The metric is required for add commands. It must be
zero if the destination is on a directly-attached network, and nonzero if the route utilizes one or more gateways.
When adding a route with metric 0, the gateway given is the address of this host on the common network, indicating the interface to be used
for transmission. Routes to a particular host are distinguished from routes to a network by interpreting the Internet address associated
with destination. The optional keywords net and host force the destination to be interpreted as a network or host, respectively. If the
destination has a local address part of INADDR_ANY, then the route is assumed to be to a network. Otherwise, it is presumed to be a route
to a host. If the route is to a destination connected via a gateway, the metric should be greater than 0. All symbolic names specified
for a destination or gateway are looked up first as a host name using If this lookup fails, is then used to interpret the name as that of a
network.
The command uses a raw socket and the SIOCADDRT and SIOCDELRT ioctls to do its work. As such, only the superuser can modify the routing
tables.
Options
-f Flushes the routing tables of all gateway entries. If is used with one of the commands described above, the tables are flushed prior
to the command's application.
-n Prevents attempts to print host and network names symbolically when reporting actions.
Restrictions
The change operation is not implemented. Therefore, you should first add the new route, and then delete the old one.
Diagnostics
add [host | network] %s: gateway %s flags %x"
The specified route is being added to the tables. The values printed are from the routing table entry supplied in the ioctl call. If the
gateway address used was not the primary address of the gateway (the first one returned by the gateway address is printed numerically as
well as symbolically.
delete [ host | network] %s: gateway %s flags %x
The specified route is being deleted from the tables. The values printed are from the routing table entry supplied in the ioctl call. If
the gateway address used was not the primary address of the gateway (the first one returned by the gateway address is printed numerically
as well as symbolically.
%s %s done
When the flag is specified, each routing table entry that is deleted is indicated with a message of this form.
Network is unreachable
An attempt to add a route failed because the gateway listed was not on a directly-connected network. The next-hop gateway must be given.
not in table
A delete operation was attempted for an entry which was not present in the tables.
routing table overflow
An add operation was attempted, but the system was low on resources and was unable to allocate memory to create the new entry.
See Also
intro(4n), routed(8c)
route(8c)