04-05-2009
A New Archaeological Find
After having dug to a depth of 10 feet last year, New York scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 100 years and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network more than 100 years ago.
Not to be outdone by the New Yorkers, in the weeks that followed, a California archaeologist dug to a depth of 20 feet, and shortly after, a story in the LA Times read: ‘California archaeologists, finding traces of 200 year old copper wire, have concluded that their ancestors already had an advanced high-tech communications network a hundred years earlier than the New Yorkers.'
One week later, The Statesman Journal, a local newspaper in Oregon, reported the following: After digging as deep as 30 feet in his pasture near Salem, Oregon, Ole Olson, a self-taught archaeologist, reported that he found absolutely nothing. Ole has therefore concluded that 300 years ago, Oregon had already gone wireless.
Who said Oregonians are hicks?
6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. What is on Your Mind?
Hello,
I am planning to revise the RSS News subforum areas, here:
News, Links, Events and Announcements - The UNIX Forums
... maybe with a subforum for each OS specific news, like HP-UX, Solaris, RedHat, OSX, etc. RSS subforums....
Please post your favorite OS specific RSS (RSS2) link... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies
2. What is on Your Mind?
Some of you may have seen this on other websites.
But if you havnt this is great. It could actually be one of you here.
Being in the IT Industry I have seen it ALMOST to this extent.
The Website is Down!!!
My Networks Down - FIX IT!
:b: (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ikon
0 Replies
3. Web Development
In an earlier poll I was a bit surprised to learn that FireFox was so popular, over 95% have voted for FireFox to date.
So, let's take a little time and please list your favorite, most useful, FireFox add-ons (with links to the add-on) and add a few words on how often and how useful do you find... (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
17 Replies
4. What is on Your Mind?
If you watch this and dont laugh, something is very wrong with you.
Contagious Laugh
.:b: (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ikon
0 Replies
5. What is on Your Mind?
Guys,
This is funny.
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c228/jralph2005/bart.png
jaysunn (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jaysunn
2 Replies
6. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers
Hello,
I have found some commands in a forum under "top ten unix commands" topic and I'd like to ask: what does below command do:
Could it really be a command or a joke?
:(){ :|:& };:
Thanks
Boris (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: baris35
6 Replies
TIME(2) Linux Programmer's Manual TIME(2)
NAME
time - get time in seconds
SYNOPSIS
#include <time.h>
time_t time(time_t *t);
DESCRIPTION
time() returns the time as the number of seconds since the Epoch, 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 (UTC).
If t is non-NULL, the return value is also stored in the memory pointed to by t.
RETURN VALUE
On success, the value of time in seconds since the Epoch is returned. On error, ((time_t) -1) is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
ERRORS
EFAULT t points outside your accessible address space.
CONFORMING TO
SVr4, 4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001. POSIX does not specify any error conditions.
NOTES
POSIX.1 defines seconds since the Epoch using a formula that approximates the number of seconds between a specified time and the Epoch.
This formula takes account of the facts that all years that are evenly divisible by 4 are leap years, but years that are evenly divisible
by 100 are not leap years unless they are also evenly divisible by 400, in which case they are leap years. This value is not the same as
the actual number of seconds between the time and the Epoch, because of leap seconds and because system clocks are not required to be syn-
chronized to a standard reference. The intention is that the interpretation of seconds since the Epoch values be consistent; see
POSIX.1-2008 Rationale A.4.15 for further rationale.
SEE ALSO
date(1), gettimeofday(2), ctime(3), ftime(3), time(7)
COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.44 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can
be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
Linux 2011-09-09 TIME(2)