Sponsored Content
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications Infrastructure Monitoring diffrence between method call and function call in perl Post 302302285 by KevinADC on Monday 30th of March 2009 02:28:27 PM
Old 03-30-2009
You should at least test the code with the fall-through condition added and see if that gets the script to run without reporting the warning (its not an error) about the unintialized variable. If it does not get rid of the warning you will know my suggestion is wrong, but if it does then your assumption of what is causing the warning could be wrong. And please note, it is a warning, not an error. Sometimes variables do have the chance of being uniitialized, which is why a default or fall-through condition is almost always a good idea.

Also, writing neat and readable code during constructions is very important, that is no excuse for writing sloppy code. Slopy code always makes tracking down bugs much harder than it should be. Its very good though that you are using "strict" and I assume "warnings".
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

perl function call tracking

Assuming the following code sub foo { dosomething {...} else { foo } is the number of times foo has been called kept track of internally and how could I access that count? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: thumper
1 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

function call

can I call a function in bash script just as in C++ while do function() done function() thanks, Steffen (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: forever_49ers
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Recursive method call getting terminated ???

Hello people, Need help !!! What am I doing wrong here ? I am writing a function to recursively list the files under a folder and it's sub-folders. Problem is once it list the files under the innermost folder, it terminates. What do I need to do so that it returns and list files under the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tipsy
3 Replies

4. Programming

Help with a function call

Hi, Can anyone help me figure out the problem I'm having with a function call? I have a header file, which sets an enum: typedef enum {INFO, WARNING, FATAL} Levels; int log_event (Levels, char *fmt, ...); ..then the function is called this way: log_event(INFO, "Message text"); ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Stevhp
6 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

call function

I have a function check_ok in my abc.sh. which return me 1 or 0 . I want to call this fuction through other shell script. this shell also send two parameter to calling function. Can you please tell me how. I am very new in unix. #!/bin/bash date_equal() { sqlplus -silent... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jamil Qadir
4 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

function call

hi, can any one help me to correct this function call. awk -F "," '{ {first=$1; sec=$2; tro=$3;quat=$4 } if (tro == "") { $3 = search "$file2" "$first" "$file3" {print $1","$2","$3","$4} } else {print $1","$2","$3 $4}}' $file1 > $file search () { (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kamel.seg
2 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Function Call

Hi, I have a string corresponding to a function. How I can call that function without if statement? Thanks in advance. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zaxon
4 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Function call

Hi foiks i am unable to find what is wrong in my code mu functionality is to exit from shell when i give 99 but it is not calling function ext Could you please correct me. read option if ; then ext else echo "out" fi function ext { echo "tested 99 and exit... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: kojo
12 Replies

9. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

Perl error: Can't call method "value" on an undefined value

Hi, I am running a perl script to automate a process and I keep running into a error can't find the "value" Can't call method "value" on an undefined value at process_file.pl line 44. file is CVS cell is ifdfdxrfmp.ksh Here is the script I have also attached it as well: ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vpundit
2 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to Call a Function

Hi I have created a function in a Shell Script test.sh function fnTest() { echo "My first Method } I have called this function in my test.sh cat abc.txt | grep "test" echo " test" fnTest But while running the shell script i got the following error: ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nanthagopal
2 Replies
Warn(3) 						User Contributed Perl Documentation						   Warn(3)

NAME
Test::Warn - Perl extension to test methods for warnings SYNOPSIS
use Test::Warn; warning_is {foo(-dri => "/")} "Unknown Parameter 'dri'", "dri != dir gives warning"; warnings_are {bar(1,1)} ["Width very small", "Height very small"]; warning_is {add(2,2)} undef, "No warnings for calc 2+2"; # or warnings_are {add(2,2)} [], "No warnings for calc 2+2"; # what reads better :-) warning_like {foo(-dri => "/")} qr/unknown param/i, "an unknown parameter test"; warnings_like {bar(1,1)} [qr/width.*small/i, qr/height.*small/i]; warning_is {foo()} {carped => "didn't find the right parameters"}; warnings_like {foo()} [qr/undefined/,qr/undefined/,{carped => qr/no result/i}]; warning_like {foo(undef)} 'uninitialized'; warning_like {bar(file => '/etc/passwd')} 'io'; warning_like {eval q/"$x"; $x;/} [qw/void uninitialized/], "some warnings at compile time"; warnings_exist {...} [qr/expected warning/], "Expected warning is thrown"; DESCRIPTION
A good style of Perl programming calls for a lot of diverse regression tests. This module provides a few convenience methods for testing warning based code. If you are not already familiar with the Test::More manpage now would be the time to go take a look. FUNCTIONS warning_is BLOCK STRING, TEST_NAME Tests that BLOCK gives the specified warning exactly once. The test fails if the BLOCK warns more than once or does not warn at all. If the string is undef, then the tests succeeds if the BLOCK doesn't give any warning. Another way to say that there are no warnings in the block is "warnings_are {foo()} [], "no warnings"". If you want to test for a warning given by Carp, you have to write something like: "warning_is {carp "msg"} {carped => 'msg'}, "Test for a carped warning"". The test will fail if a "normal" warning is found instead of a "carped" one. Note: "warn "foo"" would print something like "foo at -e line 1". This method ignores everything after the "at". Thus to match this warning you would have to call "warning_is {warn "foo"} "foo", "Foo succeeded"". If you need to test for a warning at an exactly line, try something like "warning_like {warn "foo"} qr/at XYZ.dat line 5/". warning_is and warning_are are only aliases to the same method. So you also could write "warning_is {foo()} [], "no warning"" or something similar. I decided to give two methods the same name to improve readability. A true value is returned if the test succeeds, false otherwise. The test name is optional, but recommended. warnings_are BLOCK ARRAYREF, TEST_NAME Tests to see that BLOCK gives exactly the specified warnings. The test fails if the warnings from BLOCK are not exactly the ones in ARRAYREF. If the ARRAYREF is equal to [], then the test succeeds if the BLOCK doesn't give any warning. Please read also the notes to warning_is as these methods are only aliases. If you want more than one test for carped warnings, try this: "warnings_are {carp "c1"; carp "c2"} {carped =" ['c1','c2'];> or "warnings_are {foo()} ["Warning 1", {carped =" ["Carp 1", "Carp 2"]}, "Warning 2"]>. Note that "{carped =" ...}> must always be a hash ref. warning_like BLOCK REGEXP, TEST_NAME Tests that BLOCK gives exactly one warning and it can be matched by the given regexp. If the string is undef, then the tests succeeds if the BLOCK doesn't give any warning. The REGEXP is matched against the whole warning line, which in general has the form "WARNING at __FILE__ line __LINE__". So you can check for a warning in the file Foo.pm on line 5 with "warning_like {bar()} qr/at Foo.pm line 5/, "Testname"". I don't know whether it's sensful to do such a test :-( However, you should be prepared as a matching with 'at', 'file', 'd' or similar will always pass. Think to the qr/^foo/ if you want to test for warning "foo something" in file foo.pl. You can also write the regexp in a string as "/.../" instead of using the qr/.../ syntax. Note that the slashes are important in the string, as strings without slashes are reserved for warning categories (to match warning categories as can be seen in the perllexwarn man page). Similar to "warning_is", you can test for warnings via "carp" with: "warning_like {bar()} {carped =" qr/bar called too early/i};> Similar to "warning_is"/"warnings_are", "warning_like" and "warnings_like" are only aliases to the same methods. A true value is returned if the test succeeds, false otherwise. The test name is optional, but recommended. warning_like BLOCK STRING, TEST_NAME Tests whether a BLOCK gives exactly one warning of the passed category. The categories are grouped in a tree, like it is expressed in perllexwarn. Note, that they have the hierarchical structure from perl 5.8.0, wich has a little bit changed to 5.6.1 or earlier versions (You can access the internal used tree with $Test::Warn::Categorization::tree, although I wouldn't recommend it) Thanks to the grouping in a tree, it's simple possible to test for an 'io' warning, instead for testing for a 'closed|exec|layer|newline|pipe|unopened' warning. Note, that warnings occuring at compile time, can only be catched in an eval block. So warning_like {eval q/"$x"; $x;/} [qw/void uninitialized/], "some warnings at compile time"; will work, while it wouldn't work without the eval. Note, that it isn't possible yet, to test for own categories, created with warnings::register. warnings_like BLOCK ARRAYREF, TEST_NAME Tests to see that BLOCK gives exactly the number of the specified warnings and all the warnings have to match in the defined order to the passed regexes. Please read also the notes to warning_like as these methods are only aliases. Similar to "warnings_are", you can test for multiple warnings via "carp" and for warning categories, too: warnings_like {foo()} [qr/bar warning/, qr/bar warning/, {carped => qr/bar warning/i}, 'io' ], "I hope, you'll never have to write a test for so many warnings :-)"; warnings_exist BLOCK STRING|ARRAYREF, TEST_NAME Same as warning_like, but will warn() all warnings that do not match the supplied regex/category, instead of registering an error. Use this test when you just want to make sure that specific warnings were generated, and couldn't care less if other warnings happened in the same block of code. warnings_exist {...} [qr/expected warning/], "Expected warning is thrown"; warnings_exist {...} ['uninitialized'], "Expected warning is thrown"; EXPORT "warning_is", "warnings_are", "warning_like", "warnings_like", "warnings_exist" by default. BUGS
Please note that warnings with newlines inside are making a lot of trouble. The only sensible way to handle them is to use are the "warning_like" or "warnings_like" methods. Background for these problems is that there is no really secure way to distinguish between warnings with newlines and a tracing stacktrace. If a method has it's own warn handler, overwriting $SIG{__WARN__}, my test warning methods won't get these warnings. The "warning_like BLOCK CATEGORY, TEST_NAME" method isn't extremely tested. Please use this calling style with higher attention and tell me if you find a bug. TODO
Improve this documentation. The code has some parts doubled - especially in the test scripts. This is really awkward and must be changed. Please feel free to suggest improvements. SEE ALSO
Have a look to the similar modules: Test::Exception, Test::Trap. THANKS
Many thanks to Adrian Howard, chromatic and Michael G. Schwern, who have given me a lot of ideas. AUTHOR
Janek Schleicher, <bigj AT kamelfreund.de> COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
Copyright 2002 by Janek Schleicher Copyright 2007-2011 by Alexandr Ciornii, <http://chorny.net/> This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.16.3 2012-04-01 Warn(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy