Annoying tooltips Post: 302296260

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

a very annoying problem

hi i got fbsd here,when i try to start my X server as an user I got hte following error. Fatal server error: xf86OpenConsole: Server must be running with root permissions You should be usig Xwrapper to start the server or xdm. We strongly advise against making the server SUID root! But...

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Very ANNOYING Problem - Please Help

Hey Guys I have an extremely annoying problem with regular expressions! At this point i believe the command 'read' is causing the problem due to the carriage return it places once its done. I have an continuous loop until the input is correct: (After initial read statement) while ...

3. Solaris

annoying problem with nis

This is my home set up I have 2 solaris boxes at home. One is a nis server and one is client. everytime I start the client without server, it will hang permanently looking for for nis server. is there a way to get around this? Can you set timeout the nis client? I use nis becuase my...

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Annoying in VI editor

Dear all, I try to search " ( double quote ) in a file using vi editor, I gave in the command mode /" it supposed to take to me to all the occurnces of " instead in some places it is taking me to different character.! It happens with some other characters in that file.... can you...

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

PERL annoying scope problem

Hello, I met a problem with following code: #!/usr/bin/perl -w # test.pl use strict; use diagnostics; use DBI; my $dbh = DBI->connect( "DBI:mysql:BibleBook","yifangt","password") or die("Cannot connect: $DBI::errstr"); my $sql = qq(SELECT * FROM library WHERE isbn =...

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

How do I get out of the annoying > in bash???

Occasionally I make a mistake in my shell that results in there being a > for the prompt instead of the normal $. Today I accidentally left off a " in a sed command, sed s/\"//g" infile > outfile and then I get $ sed s/\"//g" infile > outfile > > I have never figured out how to get...

7. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Html - Removing transparency on tooltips

I want to use the tooltip in html, however the tranparency is creating problem for detailed tooltips as the text from the back interferes with the readability of the tooltip text. I have done the following changes, however the normal tooltip es still transparent I call it using <a...

8. What is on Your Mind?

New Tooltips for Thread Views Using Bootstrap

Hi, Well, I changed the descriptions for threads to use Bootstrap's UI and here is the results (make sure you set your YT setting for 1080 HD): New Tooltip for UNIX.COM Using Bootstrap - YouTube Here is the simple CSS I'm using for the fonts and colors: .tooltip-inner { ...

9. What is on Your Mind?

Revised Tooltips for Thread Views Using Bootstrap

See attached screen movie that demos the revised tooltips which includes thread previews, or double click on the YT video below to go to YT and view in full screen mode, etc: HkObCAYg6LI

LEARN ABOUT XFREE86

git-cherry

GIT-CHERRY(1)							    Git Manual							     GIT-CHERRY(1)

NAME
       git-cherry - Find commits yet to be applied to upstream

SYNOPSIS
       git cherry [-v] [<upstream> [<head> [<limit>]]]

DESCRIPTION
       Determine whether there are commits in <head>..<upstream> that are equivalent to those in the range <limit>..<head>.

       The equivalence test is based on the diff, after removing whitespace and line numbers. git-cherry therefore detects when commits have been
       "copied" by means of git-cherry-pick(1), git-am(1) or git-rebase(1).

       Outputs the SHA1 of every commit in <limit>..<head>, prefixed with - for commits that have an equivalent in <upstream>, and + for commits
       that do not.

OPTIONS
       -v
	   Show the commit subjects next to the SHA1s.

       <upstream>
	   Upstream branch to search for equivalent commits. Defaults to the upstream branch of HEAD.

       <head>
	   Working branch; defaults to HEAD.

       <limit>
	   Do not report commits up to (and including) limit.

EXAMPLES
   Patch workflows
       git-cherry is frequently used in patch-based workflows (see gitworkflows(7)) to determine if a series of patches has been applied by the
       upstream maintainer. In such a workflow you might create and send a topic branch like this:

	   $ git checkout -b topic origin/master
	   # work and create some commits
	   $ git format-patch origin/master
	   $ git send-email ... 00*

       Later, you can see whether your changes have been applied by saying (still on topic):

	   $ git fetch	# update your notion of origin/master
	   $ git cherry -v

   Concrete example
       In a situation where topic consisted of three commits, and the maintainer applied two of them, the situation might look like:

	   $ git log --graph --oneline --decorate --boundary origin/master...topic
	   * 7654321 (origin/master) upstream tip commit
	   [... snip some other commits ...]
	   * cccc111 cherry-pick of C
	   * aaaa111 cherry-pick of A
	   [... snip a lot more that has happened ...]
	   | * cccc000 (topic) commit C
	   | * bbbb000 commit B
	   | * aaaa000 commit A
	   |/
	   o 1234567 branch point

       In such cases, git-cherry shows a concise summary of what has yet to be applied:

	   $ git cherry origin/master topic
	   - cccc000... commit C
	   + bbbb000... commit B
	   - aaaa000... commit A

       Here, we see that the commits A and C (marked with -) can be dropped from your topic branch when you rebase it on top of origin/master,
       while the commit B (marked with +) still needs to be kept so that it will be sent to be applied to origin/master.

   Using a limit
       The optional <limit> is useful in cases where your topic is based on other work that is not in upstream. Expanding on the previous example,
       this might look like:

	   $ git log --graph --oneline --decorate --boundary origin/master...topic
	   * 7654321 (origin/master) upstream tip commit
	   [... snip some other commits ...]
	   * cccc111 cherry-pick of C
	   * aaaa111 cherry-pick of A
	   [... snip a lot more that has happened ...]
	   | * cccc000 (topic) commit C
	   | * bbbb000 commit B
	   | * aaaa000 commit A
	   | * 0000fff (base) unpublished stuff F
	   [... snip ...]
	   | * 0000aaa unpublished stuff A
	   |/
	   o 1234567 merge-base between upstream and topic

       By specifying base as the limit, you can avoid listing commits between base and topic:

	   $ git cherry origin/master topic base
	   - cccc000... commit C
	   + bbbb000... commit B
	   - aaaa000... commit A

SEE ALSO
       git-patch-id(1)

GIT
       Part of the git(1) suite

Git 2.17.1							    10/05/2018							     GIT-CHERRY(1)