other machines with similar setup are sitting on the same subnet.
I want to shift one machine behind a cisco router that has one interface connected to the subnet 192.168.1.0 "192.168.1.1"
and the otherside on subnet 192.168.2.0 "192.168.2.1"
I want to add route to point from 192.168.1.0 to 192.168.2.0 and revrse.
what gateway should I use in the local machine and in the remote machine. qe1 or the router local interface
show in details please.
see attached file for sketch
hi,
below is the situation:
my server is in 128.10.200.xxx network.
i have a solaris computer running in a subnet. this computer got 2 nic card.
1 is 172.18.198.xxx , another 1 is 10.100.xxx.11
there is a machine stick with this computer, ip is 10.100.xxx.12
so, 10.100.xxx.11 and... (3 Replies)
Hi All, :(:confused:
I have scoured the web and can't find this anywhere.
What I am trying to do is set up a static route through an available gateway on a server, and then test connectivity through TELNET.
I have done this on AIX (I already had this procedure).
On AIX I would use SMIT. ... (7 Replies)
Does anyone know how to delete a an ip off the routing table ? i tried route delete 10.0.0.0 and gateway but it still comes back. i have 2 zones sharing one interface. help... (4 Replies)
hi all,
how do i make sure that the new routing should take effect on the os memory right away? what should i run after i add all the new "route add ....".
I have an example below:
bash-2.03# netstat -rn
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface... (1 Reply)
Hi,
I got problem of Sun Solaris 8 routing.
IP of SunA is 10.16.64.164, and have routing table:
10.16.64.0 10.16.64.164 U 1 19236 bge1
10.6.0.0 10.6.0.3 U 1 16534 bge0
224.0.0.0 10.6.0.3 U 1 ... (4 Replies)
Hello
Hope someone can help with this problem. We are running Solaris 10 with a current kernel patch of 142900-09.
We appear to be getting a serious issue with the routing table as shown below:
Output from netstat -rnv
Destination ....Mask ............Gateway ........Device... (2 Replies)
Hello All,
Problem is that redundancy doesn't work, probably a routing issue I need to get sorted out When 172.29.11.x net is down, neither node3 nor node4 is trying 172.29.12.x network,The problem lies in network 172.29.13.x
if 172.29.11.x network is down, node3/node4 should route to... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: nadeemahmed
6 Replies
LEARN ABOUT FREEBSD
nos-tun
NOS-TUN(8) BSD System Manager's Manual NOS-TUN(8)NAME
nos-tun -- implement ``nos'' or ``ka9q'' style IP over IP tunnel
SYNOPSIS
nos-tun -t tunnel -s source -d destination -p protocol_number [source] target
DESCRIPTION
The nos-tun utility is used to establish an nos style tunnel, (also known as ka9q or IP-IP tunnel) using a tun(4) kernel interface.
Tunnel is the name of the tunnel device /dev/tun0 for example.
Source and destination are the addresses used on the tunnel device. If you configure the tunnel against a cisco router, use a netmask of
``255.255.255.252'' on the cisco. This is because the tunnel is a point-to-point interface in the FreeBSD end, a concept cisco does not
really implement.
Protocol number sets tunnel mode. Original KA9Q NOS uses 94 but many people use 4 on the worldwide backbone of ampr.org.
Target is the address of the remote tunnel device, this must match the source address set on the remote end.
EXAMPLES
This end, a FreeBSD box on address 192.168.59.34:
nos-tun -t /dev/tun0 -s 192.168.61.1 -d 192.168.61.2 192.168.56.45
Remote cisco on address 192.168.56.45:
interface tunnel 0
ip address 192.168.61.2 255.255.255.252
tunnel mode nos
tunnel destination 192.168.59.34
tunnel source 192.168.56.45
AUTHORS
Nickolay N. Dudorov <nnd@itfs.nsk.su> wrote the program, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> wrote the man-page. Isao SEKI
<iseki@gongon.com> added a new flag, IP protocol number.
BUGS
We do not allow for setting our source address for multihomed machines.
BSD April 11, 1998 BSD