|
|
Sponsored Content
Top Forums
UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Expert Opinion
Post 302290602 by System Shock on Monday 23rd of February 2009 04:52:08 PM
02-23-2009
.. not so long ago, HP ran a contest to find the longest-running HP-unix box in the world. They found one in England which had been running since 1992 without a reboot.
.. wouldn't you love to unplug the power on that one
Anyway, I think it depends on what the server does and how's maintained. In the past, I've had servers running for 3-4 years non-stop, only stopped to be replaced with new ones, but these servers were doing 3 things, and 3 things only, with no updates and no regular users logging in and screwing them up. If you are not rebooting the server, you are not patching the kernel (or if you are, you are risking your kernel getting corrupted).
If you have a server which is constantly having stuff installed and uninstalled, or configs changed, yeah I would say a reboot schedule may be in order, but a turnkey system, not so much.
.. wouldn't you love to unplug the power on that one
Anyway, I think it depends on what the server does and how's maintained. In the past, I've had servers running for 3-4 years non-stop, only stopped to be replaced with new ones, but these servers were doing 3 things, and 3 things only, with no updates and no regular users logging in and screwing them up. If you are not rebooting the server, you are not patching the kernel (or if you are, you are risking your kernel getting corrupted).
If you have a server which is constantly having stuff installed and uninstalled, or configs changed, yeah I would say a reboot schedule may be in order, but a turnkey system, not so much.
|
|
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX Desktop Questions & Answers
Hey all,
I'm brand new to Unix/Linux and have a couple of questions. I own a small education/consulting company that has a staff of approx. 50 employees. Most our work is geared towards the office-style environment (i.e. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, etc.). There are also some C and Java programmers... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dennie1
4 Replies
2. Solaris
Ladies/Gentlemen,
I am looking for a web-based tool to keep track of my Sun inventory. The following list of fields are fields I would like to store: Root Passwd (needs to be secure) / Hostid / Console Port / IP Address / Platform / Application / Hostname . . . you get the point.
Do any of... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pc9456
4 Replies
3. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
Hi,
I am new at this site and at unix. I was reading some answers that the administrators and moderators have posted to others, and sometimes I feel like their a little sarcastic.
I am asking just to be patient to me, I know nothing about unix but I do want to learn, and I think that positive... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: HN19
7 Replies
4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
i'm trying to figure out a script that uses sed, and i'm not totally sure if it does what I think it does.
The script...
- takes in 3 inputs, $1, $2 are names. $3 is a file.
- filename is a file.
Here is what I'm trying to figure out:
cat $3 | grep "id17" > var2
sed "s|@@.*||g" var2 >... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gammaman
1 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello,
I get the following in one of my error logs:
Device /dev/sda, SATA disks accessed
via libata are not currently supported by smartmontools. When libata is
given an ATA
pass-thru ioctl() then an additional '-d libata' device type will be
added to smartmontools.
---------------
I... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mojoman
0 Replies
6. UNIX and Linux Applications
Hello,
I get the following in one of my error logs:
Device /dev/sda, SATA disks accessed
via libata are not currently supported by smartmontools. When libata is
given an ATA
pass-thru ioctl() then an additional '-d libata' device type will be
added to smartmontools.
---------------
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mojoman
1 Replies
7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hello all,
I want to deny any torrents passing thru linux box that are NOT encrypted. My ISP is doing packet inspection and gives warnings.
I'd like to allow torrents when client sets encryption.
Any thoughts? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: darkman_hr
5 Replies
8. What is on Your Mind?
Dear Forum staff / Advisors / members ,
I am having something in my mind, about Linux / Unix possible Interview questions collections, I guess if I post them here,which might be useful for our members and for students, and in meantime we can discuss also about those questions, what's your... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Akshay Hegde
4 Replies
9. Shell Programming and Scripting
:wall:I've this simple code:
STF=/opt/aaa
cat $STF | nice sort -u > $STF.new && mv $STF.new $STF
Which works until today. What happened is that this script has been corrupted the FS, so I've to use fschk to repair the filesystem.
I presume the move command executed just a little too early... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: accolito
1 Replies
10. AIX
Why Do We Need Root on the HMC?
In this article in IBMSystems Magazine Rob McNelly asked the question
Why Don't We Have Root on the HMC?
and he goes on to justify why we indeed shouldn't have root - kinda. I think his arguments are not as valid as he perhaps thinks they are and what's more... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: bakunin
11 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
chcat
CHCAT(8) User Commands CHCAT(8) NAME
chcat - change file SELinux security category SYNOPSIS
chcat category file... chcat -l category user... chcat [[+|-]category...] file... chcat -l [[+|-]category...] user... chcat [-d] file... chcat -l [-d] user... chcat -L [ -l ] [ user ... ] DESCRIPTION
Change/Remove the security category for each file or user. Use +/- to add/remove categories from a file or user. Note: When removing a category you must specify '--' on the command line before using the -Category syntax. This tells the command that you have finished entering options and are now specifying a category name instead. -d delete the category from each FILE/USER. -L list available categories. -l Tells chcat to operate on users instead of files. SEE ALSO
chcon(1), selinux(8), semanage(8) When operating on files this script wraps the chcon command. FILES
/etc/selinux/{SELINUXTYPE}/setrans.conf /etc/selinux/{SELINUXTYPE}/seusers chcat September 2005 CHCAT(8)