Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Why is cut slower than awk?
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Why is cut slower than awk? Post 302284573 by Annihilannic on Thursday 5th of February 2009 10:59:33 PM
Old 02-05-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by BandGap
The fact that awk is almost 8 times larger than cut (in kB) seems to make no difference.
Why would that make a difference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BandGap
Why is cut almost 4 times slower?
Good question; I guess cut's code is just inefficient. Without seeing the source code though we can only guess; what OS is this on? I just tried no HP-UX and awk was more than 3 times slower than cut. It probably depends on the nature of the input data too.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Slower slower dead

I am running RH 7.1 and i am always remotely logged in working on a database. I got php and mysql running and then as the each week goes my rsh, or secure telnet, and any other remote session slows to become extremly choppy. If i am at teh box my i am fine the computer is not bogged down at all,... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: macdonto
5 Replies

2. Programming

TCP/IP send getting slower

Hi, We have developed a server program using TCP/IP Communication to communicate with another client program. After running for some days we find the TCP/IP connection from the server program is getting slower ie, the messages are not send quickly to the client. What i mean to say is since the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajesh_puru
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

TCP/IP Connection getting slower...

Hi, We have developed a server program using TCP/IP Communication to communicate with another client program. After running for some days we find the TCP/IP connection from the server program is getting slower. What i mean to say is since the send() function in the server program (it is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajesh_puru
2 Replies

4. Solaris

Why is restore slower than backup?

After my big disaster, I'm restoring from tape on my Sun box. This is the second time I've used 'ufsrestore' with this DEC TZ88 SCSI DLT drive. The last time was for a migration from one box to another. Both the last time and this time, the restore has taken a hell of a lot longer than the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: deckard
4 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

[grep awk cut] > awk

Hi, I'm very new to scripting. grep $s $filename | awk '{print $2}' | cut -c 1-8 How can I optimize this using a single awk? I tried: awk '/$s/ {print $2}' $filename | cut -c 1-8 However didn't work, I think the awk is not recognizing $s and the verbal is something else. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: firdousamir
6 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Is awk vs cut which one is better

i was trying to work on program to look for users never log on sever.. using awk with awk is working last| awk '{print $1}' |sort -u > /tmp/users1$$ cat /etc/passwd | awk -F: '{print $1}' |sort -u > /tmp/users2$$ comm -13 /tmp/users$$ rm -f /tmp/users$$ with cut it is not working ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: macrules
3 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

HELP! using cut/awk

how would i write a shell script to show the number of lines in which int variable appears in a c++ program. how would i do this using cut or awk methods is it possbile and having a output similar to this x, number of apperances = y, number of apperances = (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: deadleg
2 Replies

8. Linux

GCC compiles a lot slower than it should

Hello everyone, i'm having a problem compiling an application i'm developing. For a month, while developing, i did lots of compilations to test it. While compiling, i noticed gcc did it pretty slow, but gave it no importance. I'm using ubuntu 10.04 32bits, and my pc has: - Dual core intel... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: adadon
1 Replies

9. Solaris

Job Run Slower using Autosys than running through terminal

Hi All, We run Many jobs evryday using Autosys. Sometimes due to various reason we got to run the job from terminal as well (using nohup). We observed that the job running through terminal(nohup) takes much less time then the autosys (for same job). What can be the possible reason for such... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kg_gaurav
1 Replies
ppmtosixel(1)                                                 General Commands Manual                                                ppmtosixel(1)

NAME
ppmtosixel - convert a portable pixmap into DEC sixel format SYNOPSIS
ppmtosixel [-raw] [-margin] [ppmfile] DESCRIPTION
Reads a portable pixmap as input. Produces sixel commands (SIX) as output. The output is formatted for color printing, e.g. for a DEC LJ250 color inkjet printer. If RGB values from the PPM file do not have maxval=100, the RGB values are rescaled. A printer control header and a color assignment table begin the SIX file. Image data is written in a compressed format by default. A printer control footer ends the image file. OPTIONS
-raw If specified, each pixel will be explicitly described in the image file. If -raw is not specified, output will default to com- pressed format in which identical adjacent pixels are replaced by "repeat pixel" commands. A raw file is often an order of magni- tude larger than a compressed file and prints much slower. -margin If -margin is not specified, the image will be start at the left margin (of the window, paper, or whatever). If -margin is speci- fied, a 1.5 inch left margin will offset the image. PRINTING
Generally, sixel files must reach the printer unfiltered. Use the lpr -x option or cat filename > /dev/tty0?. BUGS
Upon rescaling, truncation of the least significant bits of RGB values may result in poor color conversion. If the original PPM maxval was greater than 100, rescaling also reduces the image depth. While the actual RGB values from the ppm file are more or less retained, the color palette of the LJ250 may not match the colors on your screen. This seems to be a printer limitation. SEE ALSO
ppm(5) AUTHOR
Copyright (C) 1991 by Rick Vinci. 26 April 1991 ppmtosixel(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy