Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting date: invalid date `19010101' Post 302279059 by Annihilannic on Wednesday 21st of January 2009 11:04:04 PM
Old 01-22-2009
Because a 64-bit number is much bigger than a 32-bit number... so a counter using only 32-bits can't go back as far in time.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Date One Week Ago From Given Date, Not From Current Date

Hi all, I've used various scripts in the past to work out the date last week from the current date, however I now have a need to work out the date 1 week from a given date. So for example, if I have a date of the 23rd July 2010, I would like a script that can work out that one week back was... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Donkey25
4 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Check if a date field has date or timestamp or date&timestamp

Hi, In a field, I should receive the date with time stamp in a particular field. But sometimes the vendor sends just the date or the timestamp or correctl the date&timestamp. I have to figure out the the data is a date or time stamp or date&timestamp. If it is date then append "<space>00:00:00"... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: machomaddy
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

date: invalid date

Hi All, I am trying to convert the date of all files under a directory in seconds, PFB script a=`ls -lrt | wc -l` echo $a for ((i=1;i<=$a;i++)) do A=`ls -lrt | awk '{print $6,$7,$8}' | head -$i | tail -1` echo ${A} date -d '${A}' +%s donebut I am getting error date: invalid date... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Jcpratap
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Valid and invalid date in the file

Hi All, How to validate the 4th column,it is date column in the file, if it valid move to valid file else moved invalid file. 9f680174-cb87|20077337254|0|20120511|N 9f680174-cb88|20077337254|0|20120534|N i want two file valid.txt and invalid.txt Thanks, (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: bmk
7 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Converting a date to friday date and finding Min/Max date

Dear all, I have 2 questions. I have a file with many rows which has date of the format YYYYMMDD. 1. I need to change the date to that weeks friday date(Ex: 20120716(monday) to 20120720). Satuday/Sunday has to be changed to next week friday date too. 2. After converting the date to... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: 2001.arun
10 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Script to determine Date,TotalFile,total size of file based on date

I have file listed like below -rw-r--r--+ 1 test test 17M Nov 26 14:43 test1.gz -rw-r--r--+ 1 test test 0 Nov 26 14:44 test2.gz -rw-r--r--+ 1 test test 0 Nov 27 10:41 test3.gz -rw-r--r--+ 1 test test 244K Nov 27 10:41 test4.gz -rw-r--r--+ 1 test test 17M Nov 27 10:41 test5.gz I... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: krish2014
5 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Invalid date

Hi, I have a function to calculate "yesterday" in format YYYYMMDD: desa_ev9 # date +"%Y%m%d" --date "-1 day 20180701" 20180630 desa_ev9 # date +"%Y%m%d" --date "-1 day 20180720" 20180719 desa_ev9 # date +"%Y%m%d" --date "-1 day 20190101" 20181231 desa_ev9 # date +"%Y%m%d" --date "-1... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: augreen
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Date: invalid date trying to set Linux date in specific format

i try to set linux date & time in specific format but it keep giving me error Example : date "+%d-%m-%C%y %H:%M:%S" -d "19-01-2017 00:05:01" or date +"%d-%m-%C%y %H:%M:%S" -d "19-01-2017 00:05:01" keep giving me this error : date: invalid date ‘19-01-2017 00:05:01' Please use CODE tags... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: umen
7 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Compare date in .txt with system date and remove if it's lesser than system date

Can someone help me with the code wherein there is a file f1.txt with different column and 34 column have expiry date and I need to get that and compare with system date and if expiry date is <system date remove those rows and other rows should be moved to new file f2.txt . I don't want to delete... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Stuti
2 Replies

10. Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

Compare date in .txt with system date and remove if it's lesser than system date

I m working on shell scripting and I m stuck where in my .txt file there is column as expiry date and I need to compare that date with system date and need to remove all the rows where expiry date is less than system date and create a new .txt with update. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Stuti
1 Replies
BITMAP_ONTO(9)						  Basic Kernel Library Functions					    BITMAP_ONTO(9)

NAME
bitmap_onto - translate one bitmap relative to another SYNOPSIS
void bitmap_onto(unsigned long * dst, const unsigned long * orig, const unsigned long * relmap, int bits); ARGUMENTS
dst resulting translated bitmap orig original untranslated bitmap relmap bitmap relative to which translated bits number of bits in each of these bitmaps DESCRIPTION
Set the n-th bit of dst iff there exists some m such that the n-th bit of relmap is set, the m-th bit of orig is set, and the n-th bit of relmap is also the m-th _set_ bit of relmap. (If you understood the previous sentence the first time your read it, you're overqualified for your current job.) In other words, orig is mapped onto (surjectively) dst, using the the map { <n, m> | the n-th bit of relmap is the m-th set bit of relmap }. Any set bits in orig above bit number W, where W is the weight of (number of set bits in) relmap are mapped nowhere. In particular, if for all bits m set in orig, m >= W, then dst will end up empty. In situations where the possibility of such an empty result is not desired, one way to avoid it is to use the bitmap_fold operator, below, to first fold the orig bitmap over itself so that all its set bits x are in the range 0 <= x < W. The bitmap_fold operator does this by setting the bit (m % W) in dst, for each bit (m) set in orig. Example [1] for bitmap_onto: Let's say relmap has bits 30-39 set, and orig has bits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 set. Then on return from this routine, dst will have bits 31, 33, 35, 37 and 39 set. When bit 0 is set in orig, it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the first bit (if any) that is turned on in relmap. Since bit 0 was off in the above example, we leave off that bit (bit 30) in dst. When bit 1 is set in orig (as in the above example), it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the second bit that is turned on in relmap. The second bit in relmap that was turned on in the above example was bit 31, so we turned on bit 31 in dst. Similarly, we turned on bits 33, 35, 37 and 39 in dst, because they were the 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th set bits set in relmap, and the 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th bits of orig (i.e. bits 3, 5, 7 and 9) were also set. When bit 11 is set in orig, it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the twelth bit that is turned on in relmap. In the above example, there were only ten bits turned on in relmap (30..39), so that bit 11 was set in orig had no affect on dst. Example [2] for bitmap_fold + bitmap_onto: Let's say relmap has these ten bits set: 40 41 42 43 45 48 53 61 74 95 (for the curious, that's 40 plus the first ten terms of the Fibonacci sequence.) Further lets say we use the following code, invoking bitmap_fold then bitmap_onto, as suggested above to avoid the possitility of an empty dst result: unsigned long *tmp; // a temporary bitmap's bits bitmap_fold(tmp, orig, bitmap_weight(relmap, bits), bits); bitmap_onto(dst, tmp, relmap, bits); Then this table shows what various values of dst would be, for various orig's. I list the zero-based positions of each set bit. The tmp column shows the intermediate result, as computed by using bitmap_fold to fold the orig bitmap modulo ten (the weight of relmap). orig tmp dst 0 0 40 1 1 41 9 9 95 10 0 40 (*) 1 3 5 7 1 3 5 7 41 43 48 61 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 40 41 42 43 45 0 9 18 27 0 9 8 7 40 61 74 95 0 10 20 30 0 40 0 11 22 33 0 1 2 3 40 41 42 43 0 12 24 36 0 2 4 6 40 42 45 53 78 102 211 1 2 8 41 42 74 (*) (*) For these marked lines, if we hadn't first done bitmap_fold into tmp, then the dst result would have been empty. If either of orig or relmap is empty (no set bits), then dst will be returned empty. If (as explained above) the only set bits in orig are in positions m where m >= W, (where W is the weight of relmap) then dst will once again be returned empty. All bits in dst not set by the above rule are cleared. COPYRIGHT
Kernel Hackers Manual 2.6. July 2010 BITMAP_ONTO(9)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy