Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: packet loss problem
Special Forums IP Networking packet loss problem Post 302277592 by photon on Friday 16th of January 2009 07:21:22 PM
Old 01-16-2009
Before they made the change to AUTO duplex, I made the change to FULL on
my side and it drooped the connection Smilie and went to redundant connection,
which was also showing as HALF duplex on their side, my side set to AUTO for
the redundant interface.

So if they were indeed at FULL DUPLEX it would NOT have dropped the
connection and should have been FULL to FULL, but that is not the case.

When I changed back to AUTO it said HALF duplex again on their side. Only
when they changed to AUTO did my side show them as FULL duplex.

Why did my switch say HALF for data center when my switch was set to
AUTO duplex and data center side was set to FULL?Smilie

Why would connection drop if supposedly both sides where set to FULL?Smilie

This is all very frustrating, the data center is seeing problems on their end
but not disclosing that information to me and suggesting it is my problem.Smilie
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Detecting data loss during FTP

Hi, How we can detect that there has been a data loss during FTP, throught Shell scripting? I have gone through FTP return codes, but, none indicate that there has been any data loss. Can we use FTP return code 226 as an indication that during file transfer there has been no data loss? If,... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: sameerbo
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Response time under packet loss

I am experiencing a problem where under a dial condition I am experiencing packet loss, which is failrly normal, but the response to the packet loss is taking bewteen 6 and 10 seconds. Could someone please advise what the industry standard is on the response time under a packet loss senario. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: shane
1 Replies

3. Ubuntu

packet inconsistency problem

Hello everyone, I was trying to install db2 on Ubuntu, but got messed up with manual installation and Synaptic. At the moment, I find myself with a filesystem where DB2 is NOT installed ( I removed it with a sudo rm :o ) and with Synaptic still flagging db2exc as installed. The problem is that... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: clalfa
1 Replies

4. IP Networking

Problem Receiving the first OSPF packet

I trying to send and receive OSPF packets. I am using RAW Sockets(socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_OSPF)) to do this. I am successfully able to send an OSPF Hello packet however I am not able to receive a OSPF packet if I have not sent an OSPF packet earlier on the RAW SOCKET. Scenario: ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: cosmic_egg
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Problem when I try to install a wireshark packet

Hi Gurus of UNIX, I has a problem when I try to install a packet in my virtual box. (I install solaris in it) Any want can help whith it: The problem is the following # pkgadd -d wireshark-1.2.10-sol10-x86-local The following packages are available: 1 SMCwires wireshark ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: andresguillen
5 Replies

6. Solaris

Packet loss on ce interface.

Hi, I am using the ce interface on my Solaris 9 server and there is significant packet loss when transmitting large packets. Does anyone have a fix for this? ----10.1.0.0 PING Statistics---- 51 packets transmitted, 42 packets received, 17% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max =... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: sparcman
12 Replies

7. AIX

Packet loss coming with big packet size ping

(5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vishal_dba
5 Replies
..::lib::Smokeping::matchers::ExpLoss(3)			     SmokePing				  ..::lib::Smokeping::matchers::ExpLoss(3)

NAME
Smokeping::matchers::ExpLoss - exponential weighting matcher for packet loss with RMON-like thresholds DESCRIPTION
Match against exponential weighted average of last samples, thus new values are more valuable as old ones. Two thresholds - rising and falling - produce hysteresis loop like in RMON alert subsystem. If the average reaches the "rising" threshold, matcher go to the "match" state and hold It until the average drops under the "falling" threshold. Call the matcher with the following sequence: type = matcher pattern = CheckLoss(hist => <hist>, rising=><rising> [,falling => <falling>] [,skip=><stat>] [,fast=><fast>]) Arguments: hist - number of samples to weight against; weight will be disposed with exponetial decreasing manner from newest to oldest, so that the oldest sample would have 1% significance; rising - rising threshold for packet loss, 0-100% falling - falling threshold for packet loss, default is <rising> skip - skip <skip> number of samples after startup before "fire" alerts. fast - use <fast> samples for fast transition: if the values of last <fast> samples more then <rising> - take "match" state, if less then <falling> - take "no match" state. Note: If the actual history is less then <hist> value then this value is taken as the actual history. COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2008 Veniamin Konoplev Developed in cooperation with EU EGEE project LICENSE
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. AUTHOR
Veniamin Konoplev <vkonoplev@acm.org> 2.6.8 2012-02-26 ..::lib::Smokeping::matchers::ExpLoss(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy