Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: packet loss problem
Special Forums IP Networking packet loss problem Post 302277592 by photon on Friday 16th of January 2009 07:21:22 PM
Old 01-16-2009
Before they made the change to AUTO duplex, I made the change to FULL on
my side and it drooped the connection Smilie and went to redundant connection,
which was also showing as HALF duplex on their side, my side set to AUTO for
the redundant interface.

So if they were indeed at FULL DUPLEX it would NOT have dropped the
connection and should have been FULL to FULL, but that is not the case.

When I changed back to AUTO it said HALF duplex again on their side. Only
when they changed to AUTO did my side show them as FULL duplex.

Why did my switch say HALF for data center when my switch was set to
AUTO duplex and data center side was set to FULL?Smilie

Why would connection drop if supposedly both sides where set to FULL?Smilie

This is all very frustrating, the data center is seeing problems on their end
but not disclosing that information to me and suggesting it is my problem.Smilie
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Detecting data loss during FTP

Hi, How we can detect that there has been a data loss during FTP, throught Shell scripting? I have gone through FTP return codes, but, none indicate that there has been any data loss. Can we use FTP return code 226 as an indication that during file transfer there has been no data loss? If,... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: sameerbo
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Response time under packet loss

I am experiencing a problem where under a dial condition I am experiencing packet loss, which is failrly normal, but the response to the packet loss is taking bewteen 6 and 10 seconds. Could someone please advise what the industry standard is on the response time under a packet loss senario. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: shane
1 Replies

3. Ubuntu

packet inconsistency problem

Hello everyone, I was trying to install db2 on Ubuntu, but got messed up with manual installation and Synaptic. At the moment, I find myself with a filesystem where DB2 is NOT installed ( I removed it with a sudo rm :o ) and with Synaptic still flagging db2exc as installed. The problem is that... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: clalfa
1 Replies

4. IP Networking

Problem Receiving the first OSPF packet

I trying to send and receive OSPF packets. I am using RAW Sockets(socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_OSPF)) to do this. I am successfully able to send an OSPF Hello packet however I am not able to receive a OSPF packet if I have not sent an OSPF packet earlier on the RAW SOCKET. Scenario: ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: cosmic_egg
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Problem when I try to install a wireshark packet

Hi Gurus of UNIX, I has a problem when I try to install a packet in my virtual box. (I install solaris in it) Any want can help whith it: The problem is the following # pkgadd -d wireshark-1.2.10-sol10-x86-local The following packages are available: 1 SMCwires wireshark ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: andresguillen
5 Replies

6. Solaris

Packet loss on ce interface.

Hi, I am using the ce interface on my Solaris 9 server and there is significant packet loss when transmitting large packets. Does anyone have a fix for this? ----10.1.0.0 PING Statistics---- 51 packets transmitted, 42 packets received, 17% packet loss round-trip (ms) min/avg/max =... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: sparcman
12 Replies

7. AIX

Packet loss coming with big packet size ping

(5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vishal_dba
5 Replies
ldns(3) 						     Library Functions Manual							   ldns(3)

NAME
ldns_pkt_edns, ldns_pkt_edns_udp_size, ldns_pkt_edns_extended_rcode, ldns_pkt_edns_version, ldns_pkt_edns_z, ldns_pkt_edns_data, ldns_pkt_set_edns_udp_size, ldns_pkt_set_edns_extended_rcode, ldns_pkt_set_edns_version, ldns_pkt_set_edns_z, ldns_pkt_set_edns_data- SYNOPSIS
#include <stdint.h> #include <stdbool.h> #include <ldns/ldns.h> bool ldns_pkt_edns(const ldns_pkt *packet); uint16_t ldns_pkt_edns_udp_size(const ldns_pkt *packet); uint8_t ldns_pkt_edns_extended_rcode(const ldns_pkt *packet); uint8_t ldns_pkt_edns_version(const ldns_pkt *packet); uint16_t ldns_pkt_edns_z(const ldns_pkt *packet); ldns_rdf* ldns_pkt_edns_data(const ldns_pkt *packet); void ldns_pkt_set_edns_udp_size(ldns_pkt *packet, uint16_t s); void ldns_pkt_set_edns_extended_rcode(ldns_pkt *packet, uint8_t c); void ldns_pkt_set_edns_version(ldns_pkt *packet, uint8_t v); void ldns_pkt_set_edns_z(ldns_pkt *packet, uint16_t z); void ldns_pkt_set_edns_data(ldns_pkt *packet, ldns_rdf *data); DESCRIPTION
ldns_pkt_edns() returns true if this packet needs and EDNS rr to be sent. At the moment the only reason is an expected packet size larger than 512 bytes, but for instance dnssec would be a good reason too. packet: the packet to check Returns true if packet needs edns rr ldns_pkt_edns_udp_size() return the packet's edns udp size packet: the packet Returns the size ldns_pkt_edns_extended_rcode() return the packet's edns extended rcode packet: the packet Returns the rcode ldns_pkt_edns_version() return the packet's edns version packet: the packet Returns the version ldns_pkt_edns_z() return the packet's edns z value packet: the packet Returns the z value ldns_pkt_edns_data() return the packet's edns data packet: the packet Returns the data ldns_pkt_set_edns_udp_size() Set the packet's edns udp size packet: the packet s: the size ldns_pkt_set_edns_extended_rcode() Set the packet's edns extended rcode packet: the packet c: the code ldns_pkt_set_edns_version() Set the packet's edns version packet: the packet v: the version ldns_pkt_set_edns_z() Set the packet's edns z value packet: the packet z: the value ldns_pkt_set_edns_data() Set the packet's edns data packet: the packet data: the data AUTHOR
The ldns team at NLnet Labs. Which consists out of Jelte Jansen and Miek Gieben. REPORTING BUGS
Please report bugs to ldns-team@nlnetlabs.nl or in our bugzilla at http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs/index.html COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2004 - 2006 NLnet Labs. Licensed under the BSD License. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. SEE ALSO
ldns_pkt. And perldoc Net::DNS, RFC1034, RFC1035, RFC4033, RFC4034 and RFC4035. REMARKS
This manpage was automaticly generated from the ldns source code by use of Doxygen and some perl. 30 May 2006 ldns(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy