Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: makefile Question
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers makefile Question Post 302276452 by Shinra1003 on Tuesday 13th of January 2009 08:23:36 PM
Old 01-13-2009
I think the problem may be that there are not supposed to be new lines inbetween the blocks. However, when I take them out I receive the error:
Code:
'ake: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `myHello

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Makefile question

I'm trying to do string replacement with a Makefile and this is my scenario: Inside file "fileA", I have "#include<text>" statements and I want to replace it with the text inside a file called "params". I wish to perform this task using Makefiles. I've tried using m4 but that only works if... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hc29
1 Replies

2. Programming

Tough makefile question

At my company, we build some stuff using a makefile. While the makefile script is running, a developer may check in a newer version of a source file. The problem is, when we next run the make command, the target file isn't rebuilt, because the date of the target is after the dependency. Any... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mbbeaubi
1 Replies

3. Programming

Makefile very simple question.

Hi I tried many times and I dont know what the he... is going on. Problem: I hava in /home/marcin/c1_menu/ this file: menu_item_data.c I want to compile this file. so I tried something like this CC=gcc LIBS=-lmenu -lncurses RM=rm BINS=menu_item_data %: %.o ${CC} -o $@... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: marcintom
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Makefile question

Hi all, I've a makefile which has this line: @touch $@ I know $@ is for representing the target. But I don't know what's the @ preceding the touch. Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mjdousti
4 Replies

5. AIX

makefile question

Hi all, In a makefile I would like to grab the first line of a given parameter file using ‘head' and assign it to a variable, how do I do this? I've got a simple makefile but it does not work? #! /bin/ksh ... .sqc.c: db2prep $*.sqc bindfile if ] DB2_PARM=`/usr/bin/head -1 $*.prm`; fi... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: apersak
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Makefile problem - How to run module load in a Makefile

Hi, I'm trying to run the module load command in a Makefile and i'm getting the following error: make: module: command not found Why is this? Is there any way to run this command in a Makefile? NOTE: command - module load msjava/sunjdk/1.5.0 works fine outside of the Makefile (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hernandinho
2 Replies

7. Programming

A question about Makefile run by GNU make

Hello everybody, Currently I'm learning how to build projects (C programming) with GNU make. I have a problem with one Makefile and I would appreciate if you could kindly give me a hand. Here is the environment: OS: Redhat linux 5 compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dariyoosh
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Makefile executing another Makefile first?

I have 2 libraries in 2 different directories that I build with Makefiles. library B depends on library A. If I modify a .cpp file in library A and run lib B's Makefile can I have B's makefile to automatically rebuild library A? I am now rebuilding A, followed by B... but I'd like B to... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wwuster
0 Replies

9. Homework & Coursework Questions

Help with Simple Multi-Level Makefile (Extremely New at Makefile)

Use and complete the template provided. The entire template must be completed. If you don't, your post may be deleted! 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data: Basically, the prompt is make a makefile with various sub makefiles in their respective subdirectories. All code... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Tatl
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Question in creating targets in makefile

Hi, I have a question related to makefile. I'm new to makefile and I'm in the process of writing a makefile for my RBT build. I have multiple source files and when I compile them I will get multiple object files (one object file for each source file). I'm having problem in creating a target for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Anand Venkatesa
1 Replies
Test::Fatal(3)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					    Test::Fatal(3)

NAME
Test::Fatal - incredibly simple helpers for testing code with exceptions VERSION
version 0.013 SYNOPSIS
use Test::More; use Test::Fatal; use System::Under::Test qw(might_die); is( exception { might_die; }, undef, "the code lived", ); like( exception { might_die; }, qr/turns out it died/, "the code died as expected", ); isa_ok( exception { might_die; }, 'Exception::Whatever', 'the thrown exception', ); DESCRIPTION
Test::Fatal is an alternative to the popular Test::Exception. It does much less, but should allow greater flexibility in testing exception-throwing code with about the same amount of typing. It exports one routine by default: "exception". FUNCTIONS
exception my $exception = exception { ... }; "exception" takes a bare block of code and returns the exception thrown by that block. If no exception was thrown, it returns undef. Achtung! If the block results in a false exception, such as 0 or the empty string, Test::Fatal itself will die. Since either of these cases indicates a serious problem with the system under testing, this behavior is considered a feature. If you must test for these conditions, you should use Try::Tiny's try/catch mechanism. (Try::Tiny is the underlying exception handling system of Test::Fatal.) Note that there is no TAP assert being performed. In other words, no "ok" or "not ok" line is emitted. It's up to you to use the rest of "exception" in an existing test like "ok", "isa_ok", "is", et cetera. Or you may wish to use the "dies_ok" and "lives_ok" wrappers, which do provide TAP output. "exception" does not alter the stack presented to the called block, meaning that if the exception returned has a stack trace, it will include some frames between the code calling "exception" and the thing throwing the exception. This is considered a feature because it avoids the occasionally twitchy "Sub::Uplevel" mechanism. Achtung! This is not a great idea: sub exception_like(&$;$) { my ($code, $pattern, $name) = @_; like( &exception($code), $pattern, $name ); } exception_like(sub { }, qr/foo/, 'foo appears in the exception'); If the code in the "..." is going to throw a stack trace with the arguments to each subroutine in its call stack (for example via "Carp::confess", the test name, "foo appears in the exception" will itself be matched by the regex. Instead, write this: like( exception { ... }, qr/foo/, 'foo appears in the exception' ); Achtung: One final bad idea: isnt( exception { ... }, undef, "my code died!"); It's true that this tests that your code died, but you should really test that it died for the right reason. For example, if you make an unrelated mistake in the block, like using the wrong dereference, your test will pass even though the code to be tested isn't really run at all. If you're expecting an inspectable exception with an identifier or class, test that. If you're expecting a string exception, consider using "like". success try { should_live; } catch { fail("boo, we died"); } success { pass("hooray, we lived"); }; "success", exported only by request, is a Try::Tiny helper with semantics identical to "finally", but the body of the block will only be run if the "try" block ran without error. Although almost any needed exception tests can be performed with "exception", success blocks may sometimes help organize complex testing. dies_ok lives_ok Exported only by request, these two functions run a given block of code, and provide TAP output indicating if it did, or did not throw an exception. These provide an easy upgrade path for replacing existing unit tests based on "Test::Exception". RJBS does not suggest using this except as a convenience while porting tests to use Test::Fatal's "exception" routine. use Test::More tests => 2; use Test::Fatal qw(dies_ok lives_ok); dies_ok { die "I failed" } 'code that fails'; lives_ok { return "I'm still alive" } 'code that does not fail'; AUTHOR
Ricardo Signes <rjbs@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
This software is copyright (c) 2010 by Ricardo Signes. This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself. perl v5.18.2 2013-09-23 Test::Fatal(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy