Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? If possible, would you consider buying OS X for a non Mac computer? Post 302275305 by reborg on Friday 9th of January 2009 06:00:03 PM
Old 01-09-2009
I voted no. But in order to make sense of my vote I should explain.

I personally don't like the Mac OS interface, and I am not a big fan of many of the implementation of many of the administrative tools. Yes, I could install tools to do things those things way I want but as someone who works mostly from the command line it makes more sense for me to use something which behaves in a more traditional way such Solaris, GNU/Linux or BSD. Also I don't use any of the software for which Macs are the ideal platform.

Having said that, from a business perspective if there was a truly legitimate (not ambiguous) way to do this and people reporting to me wanted to use OS X and it would run on the standard hardware provided to them I wouldn't have a problem approving it on the condition that they could perform all of their work without needing to use another paid-license OS.
 

2 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Urgent help with web design problems - mac, safari and unix computer

Hi (Help, Help, Help) I am on a computer course and have designed a web site as one of my assignments. just before Xmas my college tutor "very kindly" viewed my site with a mac, safari browser and unix operating system computer. This is what she Emailed back to me, and I am trying to sort... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: skylark167
3 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

My code worked on a Mac, now it does not work in another computer

I guess Mac has default bash. Then I copy my code to another comp and run it...And it gives me an error like "bad substitution".... How I can change my code??? Never had before this kind of situation. Help please. if then n=$(sort /Users/Natalie/lastserial | tail -1) ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Natalie
6 Replies
Module::Build::Compat(3pm)				User Contributed Perl Documentation				Module::Build::Compat(3pm)

NAME
Module::Build::Compat - Compatibility with ExtUtils::MakeMaker SYNOPSIS
# In a Build.PL : use Module::Build; my $build = Module::Build->new ( module_name => 'Foo::Bar', license => 'perl', create_makefile_pl => 'traditional' ); ... DESCRIPTION
Because "ExtUtils::MakeMaker" has been the standard way to distribute modules for a long time, many tools (CPAN.pm, or your system administrator) may expect to find a working Makefile.PL in every distribution they download from CPAN. If you want to throw them a bone, you can use "Module::Build::Compat" to automatically generate a Makefile.PL for you, in one of several different styles. "Module::Build::Compat" also provides some code that helps out the Makefile.PL at runtime. METHODS
create_makefile_pl($style, $build) Creates a Makefile.PL in the current directory in one of several styles, based on the supplied "Module::Build" object $build. This is typically controlled by passing the desired style as the "create_makefile_pl" parameter to "Module::Build"'s "new()" method; the Makefile.PL will then be automatically created during the "distdir" action. The currently supported styles are: traditional A Makefile.PL will be created in the "traditional" style, i.e. it will use "ExtUtils::MakeMaker" and won't rely on "Module::Build" at all. In order to create the Makefile.PL, we'll include the "requires" and "build_requires" dependencies as the "PREREQ_PM" parameter. You don't want to use this style if during the "perl Build.PL" stage you ask the user questions, or do some auto-sensing about the user's environment, or if you subclass "Module::Build" to do some customization, because the vanilla Makefile.PL won't do any of that. small A small Makefile.PL will be created that passes all functionality through to the Build.PL script in the same directory. The user must already have "Module::Build" installed in order to use this, or else they'll get a module-not-found error. passthrough (DEPRECATED) This is just like the "small" option above, but if "Module::Build" is not already installed on the user's system, the script will offer to use "CPAN.pm" to download it and install it before continuing with the build. This option has been deprecated and may be removed in a future version of Module::Build. Modern CPAN.pm and CPANPLUS will recognize the "configure_requires" metadata property and install Module::Build before running Build.PL if Module::Build is listed and Module::Build now adds itself to configure_requires by default. Perl 5.10.1 includes "configure_requires" support. In the future, when "configure_requires" support is deemed sufficiently widespread, the "passthrough" style will be removed. run_build_pl(args => @ARGV) This method runs the Build.PL script, passing it any arguments the user may have supplied to the "perl Makefile.PL" command. Because "ExtUtils::MakeMaker" and "Module::Build" accept different arguments, this method also performs some translation between the two. "run_build_pl()" accepts the following named parameters: args The "args" parameter specifies the parameters that would usually appear on the command line of the "perl Makefile.PL" command - typically you'll just pass a reference to @ARGV. script This is the filename of the script to run - it defaults to "Build.PL". write_makefile() This method writes a 'dummy' Makefile that will pass all commands through to the corresponding "Module::Build" actions. "write_makefile()" accepts the following named parameters: makefile The name of the file to write - defaults to the string "Makefile". SCENARIOS
So, some common scenarios are: 1. Just include a Build.PL script (without a Makefile.PL script), and give installation directions in a README or INSTALL document explaining how to install the module. In particular, explain that the user must install "Module::Build" before installing your module. Note that if you do this, you may make things easier for yourself, but harder for people with older versions of CPAN or CPANPLUS on their system, because those tools generally only understand the Makefile.PL/"ExtUtils::MakeMaker" way of doing things. 2. Include a Build.PL script and a "traditional" Makefile.PL, created either manually or with "create_makefile_pl()". Users won't ever have to install "Module::Build" if they use the Makefile.PL, but they won't get to take advantage of "Module::Build"'s extra features either. For good measure, of course, test both the Makefile.PL and the Build.PL before shipping. 3. Include a Build.PL script and a "pass-through" Makefile.PL built using "Module::Build::Compat". This will mean that people can continue to use the "old" installation commands, and they may never notice that it's actually doing something else behind the scenes. It will also mean that your installation process is compatible with older versions of tools like CPAN and CPANPLUS. AUTHOR
Ken Williams <kwilliams@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2001-2006 Ken Williams. All rights reserved. This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. SEE ALSO
Module::Build(3), ExtUtils::MakeMaker(3) perl v5.14.2 2012-06-27 Module::Build::Compat(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy