Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming pass a pointer-to-pointer, or return a pointer? Post 302273896 by spirtle on Tuesday 6th of January 2009 05:43:33 AM
Old 01-06-2009
I prefer the second form because:
  1. The interface is simpler: one parameter in, the answer returned. You just check whether the pointer is null to verify success. The first form has some kind of other return value to check, which could be boolean, but I cannot tell, so I would have to look up the definitions of OK and NOK. And it is unclear from the interface whether I also need to check the pointer value, or indeed whether the pointer is NULL on failure. Looking into you implementation I can see that OK is returned if and only if the pointer is valid and the pointer is NULL on failure, but then I can write
    Code:
    char *my_pmem;
    my_malloc(64, &my_pmem);
    if(my_pmem){
      ...
    }

    so the return value is redundant -- it gives me no extra information.
    However, if you want the function to indicate more than just a simple fail/succeed (e.g. different failure modes) then the first way is the only way to do it.
  2. It mimics the standard malloc(3) function -- or it would do if the parameter was of type size_t rather than int -- and therefore has the benefit of familiarity, and makes it easier to port code written with malloc to use my_malloc.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

pointer

void main() { int a={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}; int *p=a; int *q=&a; cout<<q-p+1<<endl; } The output is 10, how? if we give cout<<q it will print the address, value won't print.... if we give cout<<p it will print the address, value won't print.... p has the base addr; q... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sarwan
1 Replies

2. Programming

Regarding char Pointer

Hi, char *s="yamaha"; cout<<s<<endl; int *p; int i=10; p=&i; cout<<p<<endl; 1) For the 1st "cout" we will get "yamaha" as output. That is we are getting "content of the address" for cout<<s. 2) But for integer "cout<<p" we are getting the "address only". Please clarify how we are... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sweta
2 Replies

3. Programming

pointer problem

could any one tell why the following is showing segmentation fault while using **ptr but working fine using **a #include<stdio.h> ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: useless79
1 Replies

4. Programming

far pointer

what is far pointer in C (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: useless79
1 Replies

5. Programming

How to return void function pointer

Hello all im trying to build function that will return void function pointer what is mean is ( not working ) the main function void * myClass::getFunction(int type){ if(type==1) return &myClass::Test1; if(type==2) return &myClass::Test2; } void myClass::Test1(){... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: umen
1 Replies

6. Programming

matrix pointer

Can anyone tell me what the following statements do? float (*tab); tab=(float (*)) calloc(MAXCLASS, (MAXCLASS+1)*sizeof(float)); (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: littleboyblu
3 Replies

7. Programming

Pointer Arithmetic In C

I have a fundamental question on C pointer arithmetry.. Suppose i have a c string pointer already pointing to a valid location, Can I just do a charptr = charptr +1; to get to the next location, irregardless if my program is 32 or 64 bits? or should i do it this way: charptr =... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Leion
1 Replies

8. Programming

Pointer to pointers

Hi guys, I'm trying to understand pointers in C and made a simple example and I've problems with It. Can someone help? #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <assert.h> int f1(char **str_); int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *str = NULL; f1(&str); ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: pharaoh
3 Replies

9. Programming

Pointer for 2D array seems to be 3D in C

I am struggling with the pointer to 2D-array (cf: 2D array of pointers). Can anybody help me elaborate how the pointer x moves in the memory to access the individual of y, especially the high lighted lines? I have talked to one of the curators of the forum, but I am still not quite clear. Here... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: yifangt
1 Replies

10. Programming

Segmentation fault when I pass a char pointer to a function in C.

I am passing a char* to the function "reverse" and when I execute it with gdb I get: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000000000040083b in reverse (s=0x400b2b "hello") at pointersExample.c:72 72 *q = *p; Attached is the source code. I do not understand why... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: jose_spain
9 Replies
allocb(9r)																allocb(9r)

NAME
allocb - STREAMS: Allocates a message block SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/stream.h> MBLKP allocb( int size, uint pri ); ARGUMENTS
Specifies the number of bytes in the message block. Specifies the priority of the request. You use this argument to determine if the allo- cation of memory blocks (waits) on the request. If you call the allocb interface at a high priority and it blocks on the request, the sys- tem could deadlock. Typically, you pass the constant BPRI_WAITOK, which signifies that allocb can block. If allocb cannot block, you should pass the BPRI_HI constant. DESCRIPTION
The allocb interface attempts to allocate a STREAMS message block. Buffer allocation fails only when the system is out of memory. If no buffer is available, you can call the bufcall interface, which helps a module recover from a memory allocation failure. RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion, the allocb interface returns a pointer to the allocated message block. This message block is of type struct msgb *. The msgb data structure is defined in the /usr/sys/include/sys/stream.h file. If allocb cannot allocate a message block, it returns a NULL pointer. SEE ALSO
Kernel Routines: bufcall(9r), esballoc(9r), testb(9r) Programmer's Guide: STREAMS allocb(9r)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy