Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: threads and signals
Top Forums Programming threads and signals Post 302270305 by fpmurphy on Saturday 20th of December 2008 10:06:56 PM
Old 12-20-2008
I strongly advise you not to try and use OS signals to deliver messages between threads if you are using pthreads. Use condition variables instead.

Code:
pthread_cond_wait() blocks the calling thread until the specified condition is signalled. 

pthread_cond_signal() is used to signal (or wake up) another thread which is waiting on the condition variable. 

pthread_cond_broadcast() should be used instead of pthread_cond_signal() if more than one thread is in a blocking wait state.

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Signals In HP-UX

does the way of handling, interrupting signals in HP-UX same as that of solaris. If there is difference than what it is.?:confused: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kapilv
1 Replies

2. Programming

Threads Signals

Hi In my process there are few threads. Now, lets say all the threads are blocked for some reason or other.. now i read it somewhere that the kernel in this situation sends in some signal which can be caught. please let me know what signal is it and more details about that.. Thanks in... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: uday_kumar_spl
1 Replies

3. HP-UX

Threads and Signals

I want to handle signals in a process that involves lots of threads. Now I do know that there should be a dedicated thread that will actually be traping signals and then these signals will be ditributed to actual threads. My question is...in case a signals has been generated by a kernel for the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ripunjay
0 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Threads and Threads Count ?

Hi all, How can I get the list of all Threads and the Total count of threads under a particular process ? Do suggest !! Awaiting for the replies !! Thanks Varun:b: (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: varungupta
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Signals...

(posted this in the scripting forum as well, but figured it should go here) So, what's going on is this: For our program, we had to create our own shell, and if the user pressed ctrl-c just at the cmdline, then this signal would be ignored, but if there is a foreground process running, let's... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: blind melon
0 Replies

6. Programming

Using Signals

How can use signals in a C program If i want a child program to signal it's parent program that it(child) program has completed the task that it was assigned.:confused: (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kapilv
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

threads and signals

can any one give me an example of a concurrency program in threads and signals, i.e how to deliver messages between threads using signals. thanks (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: moe_7
0 Replies

8. Programming

Signals and semaphores

I have problem with my application. Application is running on embedded Linux machine. It's basically multiprotocol gateway that connects two industrial Ethernet networks. We are experiencing some kind of application hang every 2 to 3 days. It seems like both threads are still running but... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: _thomas
12 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Help understanding signals

I am having trouble with folowing sigset_t s; // now s represents set of signals sigemptyset(&s) ; // initialize this set and exclude all the signals from it.is it empty? sigaddset(&s,SIGILL);//this set containts only SIGILL signal sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,&s,NULL);//lost on this one Can... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: joker40
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Help with Signals

Hi All, The problem statement is as below: Problem: A process (exe) is getting executed in background. The output of this process is getting logged in a file. After successfully running for some time the process gets terminated. In the log file following is present: ^M[7m Interrupt ^M[27m... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Praty.27
8 Replies
PTHREAD_COND(3) 					     Library Functions Manual						   PTHREAD_COND(3)

NAME
pthread_cond_init, pthread_cond_destroy, pthread_cond_signal, pthread_cond_broadcast, pthread_cond_wait, pthread_cond_timedwait - opera- tions on conditions SYNOPSIS
#include <pthread.h> pthread_cond_t cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; int pthread_cond_init(pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_condattr_t *cond_attr); int pthread_cond_signal(pthread_cond_t *cond); int pthread_cond_broadcast(pthread_cond_t *cond); int pthread_cond_wait(pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex); int pthread_cond_timedwait(pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex, const struct timespec *abstime); int pthread_cond_destroy(pthread_cond_t *cond); DESCRIPTION
A condition (short for ``condition variable'') is a synchronization device that allows threads to suspend execution and relinquish the pro- cessors until some predicate on shared data is satisfied. The basic operations on conditions are: signal the condition (when the predicate becomes true), and wait for the condition, suspending the thread execution until another thread signals the condition. A condition variable must always be associated with a mutex, to avoid the race condition where a thread prepares to wait on a condition variable and another thread signals the condition just before the first thread actually waits on it. pthread_cond_init initializes the condition variable cond, using the condition attributes specified in cond_attr, or default attributes if cond_attr is NULL. The LinuxThreads implementation supports no attributes for conditions, hence the cond_attr parameter is actually ignored. Variables of type pthread_cond_t can also be initialized statically, using the constant PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER. pthread_cond_signal restarts one of the threads that are waiting on the condition variable cond. If no threads are waiting on cond, nothing happens. If several threads are waiting on cond, exactly one is restarted, but it is not specified which. pthread_cond_broadcast restarts all the threads that are waiting on the condition variable cond. Nothing happens if no threads are waiting on cond. pthread_cond_wait atomically unlocks the mutex (as per pthread_unlock_mutex) and waits for the condition variable cond to be signaled. The thread execution is suspended and does not consume any CPU time until the condition variable is signaled. The mutex must be locked by the calling thread on entrance to pthread_cond_wait. Before returning to the calling thread, pthread_cond_wait re-acquires mutex (as per pthread_lock_mutex). Unlocking the mutex and suspending on the condition variable is done atomically. Thus, if all threads always acquire the mutex before sig- naling the condition, this guarantees that the condition cannot be signaled (and thus ignored) between the time a thread locks the mutex and the time it waits on the condition variable. pthread_cond_timedwait atomically unlocks mutex and waits on cond, as pthread_cond_wait does, but it also bounds the duration of the wait. If cond has not been signaled within the amount of time specified by abstime, the mutex mutex is re-acquired and pthread_cond_timedwait returns the error ETIMEDOUT. The abstime parameter specifies an absolute time, with the same origin as time(2) and gettimeofday(2): an abstime of 0 corresponds to 00:00:00 GMT, January 1, 1970. pthread_cond_destroy destroys a condition variable, freeing the resources it might hold. No threads must be waiting on the condition vari- able on entrance to pthread_cond_destroy. In the LinuxThreads implementation, no resources are associated with condition variables, thus pthread_cond_destroy actually does nothing except checking that the condition has no waiting threads. CANCELLATION
pthread_cond_wait and pthread_cond_timedwait are cancellation points. If a thread is cancelled while suspended in one of these functions, the thread immediately resumes execution, then locks again the mutex argument to pthread_cond_wait and pthread_cond_timedwait, and finally executes the cancellation. Consequently, cleanup handlers are assured that mutex is locked when they are called. ASYNC-SIGNAL SAFETY The condition functions are not async-signal safe, and should not be called from a signal handler. In particular, calling pthread_cond_sig- nal or pthread_cond_broadcast from a signal handler may deadlock the calling thread. RETURN VALUE
All condition variable functions return 0 on success and a non-zero error code on error. ERRORS
pthread_cond_init, pthread_cond_signal, pthread_cond_broadcast, and pthread_cond_wait never return an error code. The pthread_cond_timedwait function returns the following error codes on error: ETIMEDOUT the condition variable was not signaled until the timeout specified by abstime EINTR pthread_cond_timedwait was interrupted by a signal The pthread_cond_destroy function returns the following error code on error: EBUSY some threads are currently waiting on cond. AUTHOR
Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> SEE ALSO
pthread_condattr_init(3), pthread_mutex_lock(3), pthread_mutex_unlock(3), gettimeofday(2), nanosleep(2). EXAMPLE
Consider two shared variables x and y, protected by the mutex mut, and a condition variable cond that is to be signaled whenever x becomes greater than y. int x,y; pthread_mutex_t mut = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; pthread_cond_t cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER; Waiting until x is greater than y is performed as follows: pthread_mutex_lock(&mut); while (x <= y) { pthread_cond_wait(&cond, &mut); } /* operate on x and y */ pthread_mutex_unlock(&mut); Modifications on x and y that may cause x to become greater than y should signal the condition if needed: pthread_mutex_lock(&mut); /* modify x and y */ if (x > y) pthread_cond_broadcast(&cond); pthread_mutex_unlock(&mut); If it can be proved that at most one waiting thread needs to be waken up (for instance, if there are only two threads communicating through x and y), pthread_cond_signal can be used as a slightly more efficient alternative to pthread_cond_broadcast. In doubt, use pthread_cond_broadcast. To wait for x to becomes greater than y with a timeout of 5 seconds, do: struct timeval now; struct timespec timeout; int retcode; pthread_mutex_lock(&mut); gettimeofday(&now); timeout.tv_sec = now.tv_sec + 5; timeout.tv_nsec = now.tv_usec * 1000; retcode = 0; while (x <= y && retcode != ETIMEDOUT) { retcode = pthread_cond_timedwait(&cond, &mut, &timeout); } if (retcode == ETIMEDOUT) { /* timeout occurred */ } else { /* operate on x and y */ } pthread_mutex_unlock(&mut); LinuxThreads PTHREAD_COND(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy