Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming How Can a Machine Reads a Compiler Since A Compiler is Written in Text! Not Binaries? Post 302258040 by Corona688 on Thursday 13th of November 2008 05:35:36 PM
Old 11-13-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by f.ben.isaac
>>You can write a binary executable directly in hex,

And HEX, so what translates these hexes to binaries for the compiler?
Nothing. Hex is binary. No translation needed. It's difficult but not impossible to make rudimentary tools this way, and once you have those, you can use those rudimentary tools to build better ones.
 

We Also Found This Discussion For You

1. Programming

C compiler to build Sparc/Solaris binaries on Linux

Just that the Subject says. I am looking for a C compiler for Linux x86 that will allow me to compile a C source code file and the resulting binary will be able to run on a Sparc running Solaris. Thanks. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: lyonsd
2 Replies
ERROR::BUILDID(7stap)													     ERROR::BUILDID(7stap)

NAME
error::buildid - build-id verification failures DESCRIPTION
Because systemtap's script translation / execution stages may be executed at different times and places, it is sometimes necessary to ver- ify certain invariants. One such invariant is that if a script was informed by translate-time analysis of executables, then those same executables need to be used at run time. This checking is done based upon the build-id, a binary hash that modern (post-2007) compil- ers/toolchains add as an NT_GNU_BUILD_ID ELF note to object files and executables. Use the readelf -n command to examine the build-ids of binaries, if you are interested. Only scripts are sensitive to executables' build-ids: generally those that perform deep analysis of the binaries or their debuginfo. For example, scripts that place .function or .statement probes, or use stack backtrace-related tapset functions may be sensitive. Other scripts that rely only on process.mark or kernel.trace probes do not require debuginfo. See the DWARF DEBUGINFO section in the stap- probes(3stap) man page. During translation, systemtap saves a copy of the relevant files' build-ids within the compiled modules. At run-time, the modules compare the saved ones to the actual run-time build-ids in memory. The error message indicates that they did not match, so the module will decline placing a probe that was computed based upon obsolete data. This is important for safety, as placing them at an inappropriate address could crash the programs. However, this is not necessarily a fatal error, since probes unrelated to the mismatching binaries may operate. A build-id mismatch could be caused by a few different situations. The main one is where the executable versions or architecture were dif- ferent between the systemtap translation and execution times/places. For example, one may run a stap-server on a slightly different ver- sion of the OS distribution. The kernel running on the workstation may be slightly different from the version being targeted - perhaps due to a pending kernel upgrade leaving different files on disk versus running in memory. If your OS distribution uses separate debuginfo packages, the split .IR .debug files may not exactly match the main binaries. SEE ALSO
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBuildId, stap(1), stapprobes(3stap), warning::debuginfo(7stap), error::reporting(7stap) ERROR::BUILDID(7stap)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy