Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers brackets vs parentheses - single and double Post 302240305 by ankimo on Thursday 25th of September 2008 11:24:47 AM
Old 09-25-2008
brackets vs parentheses - single and double

hi, unix gurus.

i am wondering if someone can give me a clear explanation of the differneces between parentheses and brackets, both single and double.


i have heard that double parentheses (( are used for numerical expressions and that single brackets [ are used for strings. but i see very different behavior on this forum and elsewhere. i would love some clarity!


thanks for your help as usual.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

single or double quote in SED

i m trying the following command but its not working: sed 's/find/\'replace\'/g' myFile but the sed enters into new line # sed 's/find/re\'place/g' myFile > I havn't any idea how to put single quote in my replace string. Your early help woud be appreciated. Thanx (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: asami
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

why put double square brackets in an if clause?

what is the rationale behind putting double square brackets in an if clause? for e.g. if ] || ] || ]; then echo some fields are null fi (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: napolayan
5 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

WHy the double square brackets?

One of the senior administrators gave me a shell script to modify and it begins as follows: if ] && ] {more code follows} Why the double square brackets? (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: mojoman
10 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Use of double square brackets in ksh

Hi First apologies if this has been raised before. I've got the following in a ksh script: if ] For some reason this does not work. But if I remove the double square brackets to: if This works. I thought ksh supported the ]. Or is there more to it? Thanks in advance. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tsu3000
3 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

why double brackets for array loop?

Dear All, Recently got some sample from internet search for array handle in shell script, and I can not understand why we need to put double brackets when extracting array values by this way : for ((i=0; i<${#admins}; i++)); do echo "${admins}" done if modify from double to single... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: tiger2000
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Double square brackets question

Hi, I just came across an interesting shell script syntax like the one below: ] && (trap 'rm -rf ${WORK_DIR}/*.$$; echo "\n\nInterrupted !!\n\n"; exit 4' 1 2 3 15) Can someone please explain the code snippet above? The trap command bit is fine but ] && is the hazy part. Generally we use an... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: King Nothing
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Brackets, parentheses in Shell Scripting

Hello, I have done a great deal of research on this and still cannot come to an understanding of the following: In if-else statements in shell scripting I have seen examples of single brackets, double brackets, single parantheses, and double paratheses. When should each one be used? And... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mojoman
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Rules with using double parentheses in Bash

Hi.could you explain me what are the rules when we are using double parentesis in if statement,if I put ,the code is working ,with (( is not #!/bin/bash if (($# > 0)) then if ((! -d "$1")) then echo "Directory $1 not found" fi else echo Problem fi (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: lio123
8 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Single or double square brackets

Hi frieds, I don't understand the difference between single square bracket and double square brackets in a IF condition. Ex. if ; then RETURNJOB=1 else RETURNJOB=0 fi It run, but this if ]; then RETURNJOB=1 else RETURNJOB=0 fi (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dogshort
4 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Replace double quotes with a single quote within a double quoted string

Hi Froum. I have tried in vain to find a solution for this problem - I'm trying to replace any double quotes within a quoted string with a single quote, leaving everything else as is. I have the following data: Before: ... (32 Replies)
Discussion started by: pchang
32 Replies
NOWEB(1)						      General Commands Manual							  NOWEB(1)

NAME
noweb - a simple literate-programming tool SYNOPSIS
noweb [-t] [-o] [-Lformat] [-markup parser] [file] ... DESCRIPTION
Noweb is a literate-programming tool like FunnelWEB or nuweb, only simpler. A noweb file contains program source code interleaved with documentation. When noweb is invoked, it writes the program source code to the output files mentioned in the noweb file, and it writes a TeX file for typeset documentation. The noweb(1) command is for people who don't like reading man pages or who are switching from nuweb. To get the most out of noweb, use notangle(1) and noweave(1) instead. FORMAT OF NOWEB FILES
A noweb file is a sequence of chunks, which may appear in any order. A chunk may contain code or documentation. Documentation chunks begin with a line that starts with an at sign (@) followed by a space or newline. They have no names. Code chunks begin with <<chunk name>>= on a line by itself. The double left angle bracket (<<) must be in the first column. Chunks are terminated by the beginning of another chunk, or by end of file. If the first line in the file does not mark the beginning of a chunk, it is assumed to be the first line of a documentation chunk. Documentation chunks contain text that is copied verbatim to the TeX file (except for quoted code). noweb works with LaTeX; the first doc- umentation chunk must contain a LaTeX documentclass command, it must contain usepackage{noweb} in the preamble, and finally it must also contain a LaTeX egin{document} command. Code chunks contain program source code and references to other code chunks. Several code chunks may have the same name; noweb concate- nates their definitions to produce a single chunk, just as other literate-programming tools do. noweb looks for chunks that are defined but not used in the source file. If the name of such a chunk contains no spaces, the chunk is an ``output file;'' noweb expands it and writes the result onto the file of the same name. A code-chunk definition is like a macro definition; it contains references to other chunks, which are themselves expanded, and so on. noweb's output is readable; it preserves the indentation of expanded chunks with respect to the chunks in which they appear. If a star (*) is appended to the name of an output file, noweb includes line-number information as specified by the -Lformat option (or for C if no -Lformat option is given). The name itself may not contain shell metacharacters. Code may be quoted within documentation chunks by placing double square brackets ([[...]]) around it. These double square brackets are used to give the code special typographic treatment in the TeX file. If quoted code ends with three or more square brackets, noweb chooses the rightmost pair, so that, for example, [[a[i]]] is parsed correctly. In code, noweb treats unpaired double left or right angle brackets as literal << and >>. To force any such brackets, even paired brackets or brackets in documentation, to be treated as literal, use a preceding at sign (e.g. @<<). OPTIONS
-t Suppress generation of a TeX file. -o Suppress generation of output files. -Lformat Use format to format line-number information for starred output files. (If the option is omitted, a format suitable for C is used.) format is as defined by notangle(1); -markup parser Use parser to parse the input file. Enables use of noweb tools on files in other formats; for example, the numarkup parser under- stands nuweb(1) format. See nowebfilters(7) for more information. For experts only. BUGS
Ignoring unused chunks whose names contain spaces sometimes causes problems, especially in the case when a chunk has multiple definitions and one is misspelled; the misspelled definition will be silently ignored. noroots(1) can be used as a sanity checker to catch this sort of mistake. noweb is intended for users who don't want the power or the complexity of command-line options. More sophisticated users should avoid noweb and use noweave and notangle instead. If the design were better, we could all use the same commands. noweb requires the new version of awk. DEC nawk has a bug in that that causes problems with braces in TeX output. GNU gawk is reported to work. The default LaTeX pagestyles don't set the width of the boxes containing headers and footers. Since noweb code paragraphs are extra wide, this LaTeX bug sometimes results in extra-wide headers and footers. The remedy is to redefine the relevant ps@* commands; ps@noweb in noweb.sty can be used as an example. SEE ALSO
notangle(1), noweave(1), noroots(1), nountangle(1), nowebstyle(7), nowebfilters(7), nuweb2noweb(1) Norman Ramsey, Literate programming simplified, IEEE Software 11(5):97-105, September 1994. VERSION
This man page is from noweb version 2.11b. AUTHOR
Norman Ramsey, Harvard University. Internet address nr@eecs.harvard.edu. Noweb home page at http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/noweb. local 3/28/2001 NOWEB(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy