Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Creating an array to hold posix thread ids: Only dynamic array works Post 302238712 by kmehta on Sunday 21st of September 2008 05:36:06 PM
Old 09-21-2008
I am not sure I understand. But you were right, if the above code is placed in the main() function, it works fine, but if I place it in a separate function and call this function from main(), it gives the garbage output.

But I am still not quite sure why it shouldn't work. As you said, first example works fine becuase dynamically allocated threadids exists beyond this fucntion, but it second example it dies immediately. So, shouldnt I face a problem when I place the code directly in the main() function ?? The threadids could die immediately again before the thread is actually spawned, in which case it picks up a garbage output.

Thanks.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

creating a dynamic array in ksh

Hi, Is it possible to create a dynamic array in shell script. I am trying to get the list of logfiles that created that day and put it in a dynamic array. I am not sure about it. help me New to scripting Gundu (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gundu
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

MAX SIZE ARRAY Can Hold it

Hi, Do anyone know what's the max size of array (in awk) can be store before hit any memory issue. Regards (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: epall
3 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Dynamic Array Issue

Could one of you, please, provide some input regarding my problem below and it is as follows: I have 2 files that I need to make sure are identical before processing: First, I sort both files Second, I do a diff file1 file2 > File 3 This provides me with the difference. Now, I need to... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: ddedic
6 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to hold string array in shell scripts

Gents, Below is the Shell script which I am trying to hold a string of array that is passed from a java file. But it is not working . Can any one please help me to by fixing it. #!/bin/csh/ set copy = ($argv) echo $copy >> /home/users/bavananr/rrr.log echo $copy >>... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: brajesh
3 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

creating a dynamic array

i want to create an array the array elements are populated depending upon the number of entries present in a data file The data file is created dynamically how to achieve the same thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: trichyselva
1 Replies

6. Programming

array dynamic allocation

Hi, I have the following problem: i must allocate a dynamic array from a subroutine which should return such array to main function. The subroutine has already a return parameter so i thought of pass the array as I/O parameter. I tried the following program but it doesn't work (segmentation... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: littleboyblu
11 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

dynamic index for array in while loop

Hi, I'm just trying to use a dynamic index for some array elements that I'm accessing within a loop. Specifically, I want to access an array at variable position $counter and then also at location $counter + 1 and $counter + 2 (the second and third array positions after it) but I keep getting... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: weak_code-fu
0 Replies

8. Programming

readdir and dynamic array memory corruption

Hi everyone I am developing an utility. At some part of it I read directory entries to a dynamic array: struct list It stores pointers to items: list.entries, which are structures: struct entry If a number of files in a directory is greater then number of elements an array was initially... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: torbium
11 Replies

9. Programming

Memory corruption in dynamic array of strings

I put together a C function to add strings to a dynamic array of strings (mostly for educational purpose to explain pointers to my kid). It works, but sometimes one or two strings in the array becomes corrupted. Running example on 64 bit Ubuntu, gcc ver. 4.8.4 Hope my code is self-explanatory: ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: migurus
2 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Creating a pseudo-array in dash, (POSIX).

Arrays in dash, (POSIX). Hi gurus... I am thinking of trying AudioScope.sh in pure POSIX so... I need an array in dash, I know it is not possible but pseudo-arrays are. I have two versions that work, the second is an idea from the WWW. The first is what I would like to use. There are... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
8 Replies
Carp::Assert(3pm)					User Contributed Perl Documentation					 Carp::Assert(3pm)

NAME
Carp::Assert - executable comments SYNOPSIS
# Assertions are on. use Carp::Assert; $next_sunrise_time = sunrise(); # Assert that the sun must rise in the next 24 hours. assert(($next_sunrise_time - time) < 24*60*60) if DEBUG; # Assert that your customer's primary credit card is active affirm { my @cards = @{$customer->credit_cards}; $cards[0]->is_active; }; # Assertions are off. no Carp::Assert; $next_pres = divine_next_president(); # Assert that if you predict Dan Quayle will be the next president # your crystal ball might need some polishing. However, since # assertions are off, IT COULD HAPPEN! shouldnt($next_pres, 'Dan Quayle') if DEBUG; DESCRIPTION
"We are ready for any unforseen event that may or may not occur." - Dan Quayle Carp::Assert is intended for a purpose like the ANSI C library assert.h. If you're already familiar with assert.h, then you can probably skip this and go straight to the FUNCTIONS section. Assertions are the explict expressions of your assumptions about the reality your program is expected to deal with, and a declaration of those which it is not. They are used to prevent your program from blissfully processing garbage inputs (garbage in, garbage out becomes garbage in, error out) and to tell you when you've produced garbage output. (If I was going to be a cynic about Perl and the user nature, I'd say there are no user inputs but garbage, and Perl produces nothing but...) An assertion is used to prevent the impossible from being asked of your code, or at least tell you when it does. For example: # Take the square root of a number. sub my_sqrt { my($num) = shift; # the square root of a negative number is imaginary. assert($num >= 0); return sqrt $num; } The assertion will warn you if a negative number was handed to your subroutine, a reality the routine has no intention of dealing with. An assertion should also be used as something of a reality check, to make sure what your code just did really did happen: open(FILE, $filename) || die $!; @stuff = <FILE>; @stuff = do_something(@stuff); # I should have some stuff. assert(@stuff > 0); The assertion makes sure you have some @stuff at the end. Maybe the file was empty, maybe do_something() returned an empty list... either way, the assert() will give you a clue as to where the problem lies, rather than 50 lines down at when you wonder why your program isn't printing anything. Since assertions are designed for debugging and will remove themelves from production code, your assertions should be carefully crafted so as to not have any side-effects, change any variables, or otherwise have any effect on your program. Here is an example of a bad asserta- tion: assert($error = 1 if $king ne 'Henry'); # Bad! It sets an error flag which may then be used somewhere else in your program. When you shut off your assertions with the $DEBUG flag, $error will no longer be set. Here's another example of bad use: assert($next_pres ne 'Dan Quayle' or goto Canada); # Bad! This assertion has the side effect of moving to Canada should it fail. This is a very bad assertion since error handling should not be placed in an assertion, nor should it have side-effects. In short, an assertion is an executable comment. For instance, instead of writing this # $life ends with a '!' $life = begin_life(); you'd replace the comment with an assertion which enforces the comment. $life = begin_life(); assert( $life =~ /!$/ ); FUNCTIONS
assert assert(EXPR) if DEBUG; assert(EXPR, $name) if DEBUG; assert's functionality is effected by compile time value of the DEBUG constant, controlled by saying "use Carp::Assert" or "no Carp::Assert". In the former case, assert will function as below. Otherwise, the assert function will compile itself out of the pro- gram. See "Debugging vs Production" for details. Give assert an expression, assert will Carp::confess() if that expression is false, otherwise it does nothing. (DO NOT use the return value of assert for anything, I mean it... really!). The error from assert will look something like this: Assertion failed! Carp::Assert::assert(0) called at prog line 23 main::foo called at prog line 50 Indicating that in the file "prog" an assert failed inside the function main::foo() on line 23 and that foo() was in turn called from line 50 in the same file. If given a $name, assert() will incorporate this into your error message, giving users something of a better idea what's going on. assert( Dogs->isa('People'), 'Dogs are people, too!' ) if DEBUG; # Result - "Assertion (Dogs are people, too!) failed!" affirm affirm BLOCK if DEBUG; affirm BLOCK $name if DEBUG; Very similar to assert(), but instead of taking just a simple expression it takes an entire block of code and evaluates it to make sure its true. This can allow more complicated assertions than assert() can without letting the debugging code leak out into production and without having to smash together several statements into one. affirm { my $customer = Customer->new($customerid); my @cards = $customer->credit_cards; grep { $_->is_active } @cards; } "Our customer has an active credit card"; affirm() also has the nice side effect that if you forgot the "if DEBUG" suffix its arguments will not be evaluated at all. This can be nice if you stick affirm()s with expensive checks into hot loops and other time-sensitive parts of your program. If the $name is left off and your Perl version is 5.6 or higher the affirm() diagnostics will include the code begin affirmed. should shouldnt should ($this, $shouldbe) if DEBUG; shouldnt($this, $shouldntbe) if DEBUG; Similar to assert(), it is specially for simple "this should be that" or "this should be anything but that" style of assertions. Due to Perl's lack of a good macro system, assert() can only report where something failed, but it can't report what failed or how. should() and shouldnt() can produce more informative error messages: Assertion ('this' should be 'that'!) failed! Carp::Assert::should('this', 'that') called at moof line 29 main::foo() called at moof line 58 So this: should($this, $that) if DEBUG; is similar to this: assert($this eq $that) if DEBUG; except for the better error message. Currently, should() and shouldnt() can only do simple eq and ne tests (respectively). Future versions may allow regexes. Debugging vs Production Because assertions are extra code and because it is sometimes necessary to place them in 'hot' portions of your code where speed is para- mount, Carp::Assert provides the option to remove its assert() calls from your program. So, we provide a way to force Perl to inline the switched off assert() routine, thereby removing almost all performance impact on your pro- duction code. no Carp::Assert; # assertions are off. assert(1==1) if DEBUG; DEBUG is a constant set to 0. Adding the 'if DEBUG' condition on your assert() call gives perl the cue to go ahead and remove assert() call from your program entirely, since the if conditional will always be false. # With C<no Carp::Assert> the assert() has no impact. for (1..100) { assert( do_some_really_time_consuming_check ) if DEBUG; } If "if DEBUG" gets too annoying, you can always use affirm(). # Once again, affirm() has (almost) no impact with C<no Carp::Assert> for (1..100) { affirm { do_some_really_time_consuming_check }; } Another way to switch off all asserts, system wide, is to define the NDEBUG or the PERL_NDEBUG environment variable. You can safely leave out the "if DEBUG" part, but then your assert() function will always execute (and its arguments evaluated and time spent). To get around this, use affirm(). You still have the overhead of calling a function but at least its arguments will not be evalu- ated. Differences from ANSI C assert() is intended to act like the function from ANSI C fame. Unfortunately, due to Perl's lack of macros or strong inlining, it's not nearly as unobtrusive. Well, the obvious one is the "if DEBUG" part. This is cleanest way I could think of to cause each assert() call and its arguments to be removed from the program at compile-time, like the ANSI C macro does. Also, this version of assert does not report the statement which failed, just the line number and call frame via Carp::confess. You can't do "assert('$a == $b')" because $a and $b will probably be lexical, and thus unavailable to assert(). But with Perl, unlike C, you always have the source to look through, so the need isn't as great. EFFICIENCY
With "no Carp::Assert" (or NDEBUG) and using the "if DEBUG" suffixes on all your assertions, Carp::Assert has almost no impact on your pro- duction code. I say almost because it does still add some load-time to your code (I've tried to reduce this as much as possible). If you forget the "if DEBUG" on an "assert()", "should()" or "shouldnt()", its arguments are still evaluated and thus will impact your code. You'll also have the extra overhead of calling a subroutine (even if that subroutine does nothing). Forgetting the "if DEBUG" on an "affirm()" is not so bad. While you still have the overhead of calling a subroutine (one that does noth- ing) it will not evaluate its code block and that can save alot. Try to remember the if DEBUG. ENVIRONMENT
NDEBUG Defining NDEBUG switches off all assertions. It has the same effect as changing "use Carp::Assert" to "no Carp::Assert" but it effects all code. PERL_NDEBUG Same as NDEBUG and will override it. Its provided to give you something which won't conflict with any C programs you might be working on at the same time. BUGS, CAVETS and other MUSINGS Conflicts with "POSIX.pm" The "POSIX" module exports an "assert" routine which will conflict with "Carp::Assert" if both are used in the same namespace. If you are using both together, prevent "POSIX" from exporting like so: use POSIX (); use Carp::Assert; Since "POSIX" exports way too much, you should be using it like that anyway. "affirm" and $^S affirm() mucks with the expression's caller and it is run in an eval so anything that checks $^S will be wrong. "shouldn't" Yes, there is a "shouldn't" routine. It mostly works, but you must put the "if DEBUG" after it. missing "if DEBUG" It would be nice if we could warn about missing "if DEBUG". SEE ALSO
assertions is a new module available in 5.9.0 which provides assertions which can be enabled/disabled at compile time for real, no "if DEBUG" necessary. COPYRIGHT
Copyright 2001-2007 by Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. See http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ AUTHOR
Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> perl v5.8.8 2008-02-20 Carp::Assert(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy