Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming char constants vs. hard-coding Post 302227826 by otheus on Friday 22nd of August 2008 04:23:01 AM
Old 08-22-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by redoubtable
Despite what everyone said I think speed differences between both cases are not mensurable.
It IS measurable. But even after 1/2 million invocations, it made almost no difference on a very slow (10-year old) machine.

Quote:
For one, memory is stored in the data segment in both cases thus it's accessed in the same way/speed.
mostly wrong. The '@' literal is embedded in the machine instructions itself (for x86 architectures), so that's in the code segment. The "const" designation for a variable means the compiler can optimize that variable, for instance, by also "hard coding" the value inside instructions. However, I did not turn on optimizations. In my code, I defined the const char to be inside the main() call, meaning it would go on the stack. Do nothing is on the data segment. Finally, the call to strchr places both arguments on the stack. So the price of having a constant in an immediate instruction type is practically nullified by this.

Quote:
Furthermore, this is highly platform/architecture/implementation dependent.
Architecture and processor, yes. For instance, while practically all processors have both an 'immediate' addressing and a 'direct' addressing mode, the difference in the number of clock cycles to process such an argument varies across architectures (surely), processor manufacturers (AMD vs Intel), and processor families (Pentium vs Celeron). There almost always IS a difference, but in very-large-pipelined architectures and efficient caching, that difference is statistically erased.

However, there's more dependency on the compiler. Whether the compiler chooses immediate mode or direct mode for literals, whether it uses direct or stack-indexed addressing addressing for constants, weather it passes the first argument in using a register or the last, etc, etc. The OS can come into play, too, especially with my program of 100000 lines of code. This likely meant there were page-traps during the execution. For this reason (and others), I took an average of several runs.

Quote:
We should call a meta-programmer to enlighten us with accurate specifications on the matter at hand.
WTF do you mean by a metaprogrammer??
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

constants in C/C++

Hi all My question is related to following sample code which tries to change consant value by pointers.(I know it is wrong practice but i am surprised by mis-behaviour) The code: #include <stdio.h> int main() { const int x = 10; int *y; const int * const z = &x; y = (int *)&x;... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Shobhit
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

perl: eval and constants

is it possible to use eval to create constants in perl? i cannot seem to get anything to work, and my searches are turning up little to nothing. an example of what i am trying to do is this: 2 arrays: array 1: 'FOOD','NUMBER','OS' array 2: 'pizza','two','unix' loop through the arrays and... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: effigy
5 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

I wanted to update a script, more dynamic (just say no to hard coding)...

currently it has the following: bdumpN=`ll /home/apps/oracle/admin/DBprod/bdump/DBprod_j* | grep "$Cdate" | wc -l` If I pass the DBname, I would not have to hardcode it in the script... I can capture the database name by adding the following: DBname=$1 The problem is, I have been unable... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mr_manny
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Sending mails to various users without hard coding the email IDS

Hi Can any one help me out ? I am trying to send an autogenerated mail with an attachment to bulk of users using 'MAILX' and 'UNENCODE' . I have used it as follows X " ( cat /sastemp/body.txt; uuencode Test.xls.gz Test.xls.gz ) | mailx -s 'Testing' ' abcd@yahoo.com , efgh@gmail.com ' " ... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: manas6
9 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Operation with real variables and constants

Hello there, I'd like to define a variable b equal to 0.5/a where a=0.001, so I wrote something like that: a=0.001; let 'b=0.5/$a'; but it doesn't work... maybe because the variable a has a real value??? Any help will be appreciated!!!:D (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Giordano Bruno
1 Replies

6. Programming

Adding a single char to a char pointer.

Hello, I'm trying to write a method which will return the extension of a file given the file's name, e.g. test.txt should return txt. I'm using C so am limited to char pointers and arrays. Here is the code as I have it: char* getext(char *file) { char *extension; int i, j;... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: pallak7
5 Replies

7. Programming

error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’

Compiling xpp (The X Printing Panel) on SL6 (RHEL6 essentially): xpp.cxx: In constructor ‘printFiles::printFiles(int, char**, int&)’: xpp.cxx:200: error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’ The same error with all c++ constructors - gcc 4.4.4. If anyone can throw any light on... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: GSO
8 Replies

8. Web Development

Using LWP without hard coding password

Hi, I would like to read content from a https site. I have decided to use LWP module in perl. but it throwed 401 Authorization required error. i dont want to hard code the password in my perl code. Is there any way to achieve the authentication without hardcoding the password. Thanks,... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: pandeesh
1 Replies
POSIX_GETRLIMIT(3)							 1							POSIX_GETRLIMIT(3)

posix_getrlimit - Return info about system resource limits

SYNOPSIS
array posix_getrlimit (void ) DESCRIPTION
posix_getrlimit(3) returns an array of information about the current resource's soft and hard limits. Each resource has an associated soft and hard limit. The soft limit is the value that the kernel enforces for the corresponding resource. The hard limit acts as a ceiling for the soft limit. An unprivileged process may only set its soft limit to a value from 0 to the hard limit, and irreversibly lower its hard limit. RETURN VALUES
Returns an associative array of elements for each limit that is defined. Each limit has a soft and a hard limit. List of possible limits returned +-----------+---------------------------------------------------+ |Limit name | | | | | | | Limit description | | | | +-----------+---------------------------------------------------+ | core | | | | | | | The maximum size of the core file. When 0, not | | | core files are created. When core files are | | | larger than this size, they will be truncated at | | | this size. | | | | | totalmem | | | | | | | The maximum size of the memory of the process, | | | in bytes. | | | | |virtualmem | | | | | | | The maximum size of the virtual memory for the | | | process, in bytes. | | | | | data | | | | | | | The maximum size of the data segment for the | | | process, in bytes. | | | | | stack | | | | | | | The maximum size of the process stack, in bytes. | | | | | rss | | | | | | | The maximum number of virtual pages resident in | | | RAM | | | | | maxproc | | | | | | | The maximum number of processes that can be cre- | | | ated for the real user ID of the calling process. | | | | | memlock | | | | | | | The maximum number of bytes of memory that may | | | be locked into RAM. | | | | | cpu | | | | | | | The amount of time the process is allowed to use | | | the CPU. | | | | | filesize | | | | | | | The maximum size of the data segment for the | | | process, in bytes. | | | | |openfiles | | | | | | | One more than the maximum number of open file | | | descriptors. | | | | +-----------+---------------------------------------------------+ EXAMPLES
Example #1 Example use of posix_getrlimit(3) <?php $limits = posix_getrlimit(); print_r($limits); ?> The above example will output something similar to: Array ( [soft core] => 0 [hard core] => unlimited [soft data] => unlimited [hard data] => unlimited [soft stack] => 8388608 [hard stack] => unlimited [soft totalmem] => unlimited [hard totalmem] => unlimited [soft rss] => unlimited [hard rss] => unlimited [soft maxproc] => unlimited [hard maxproc] => unlimited [soft memlock] => unlimited [hard memlock] => unlimited [soft cpu] => unlimited [hard cpu] => unlimited [soft filesize] => unlimited [hard filesize] => unlimited [soft openfiles] => 1024 [hard openfiles] => 1024 ) NOTES
Note This is a not POSIX function, but is common on BSD and System V systems. If the system does not support this function, then it will not be included at compile time. This may be checked with function_exists(3). SEE ALSO
man page GETRLIMIT(2). PHP Documentation Group POSIX_GETRLIMIT(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy