Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Difference between development and Production unix servers for a application?? Post 302227390 by otheus on Thursday 21st of August 2008 06:05:25 AM
Old 08-21-2008
Alright, then we do it this way: At all possible points of the program, prefix every command with "time". (You should make sure that the output from time doesn't interfere with your script in any way.) Run it on dev, then run it on production and see where the bottlenecks are.

If the main bottleneck is in the SYBASE inserts, then I suspect the problem is related to table-locking while the database is under heavy load.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

music production, unix

okay, so i'm using windows right now because i produce electronic music and all my software is written for windows. i want to get rid of microsoft's os, so i'm wondering if there is an easy way to run these windows programs on a unix system. maybe a windows emulator for x-windows or something... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: nydel
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Dominant Unix in production?

What's the dominant Unix in production environment? Solaris or Linux? HP-UX and AIX have never been "dominant", while HP-UX is widely used in financial circles... Is Linux reallly where it's all going for major production environments running Oracle/SAP/whatever or will Solaris remain... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: etc
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Application servers, proper usage

Is it common in the Unix/Linux environment to install compute intensive applications on a Server system and have the client machines download the executables into memory at runtime to run locally? This model seems taxing to the network, and as I understand, has been largely abandoned in the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jonwillog
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Most common version of UNIX on production systems

I am new to UNIX (about a year) and learning as fast as I can. I am an instructor teaching UNIX and have two labs with Ultra 10 333 MHz, Sun Blade 1000 1 GHz, Blade 100, and Two Enterprise 250 Servers. We are currently teaching our classes using the Solaris 2.10 OS, downloaded in May 2006, I am not... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: dutchman
7 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Application Servers Installation and Users

Hi, When most of the server applications get installed, they create their own user. I believe this is to not use the "root" account. For example, Apache when installed creates a user called "apache". And the directories which it uses are all owned by this user. This seems to be the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: srikanths
2 Replies

6. BSD

Copying OpenBSD Kernel from a non production to production machine

Hi All, There are few OpenBSD 4.8 servers without compiler installed at my working place. However, sometimes there are some patches released for patching the kernel. My question is: Can I setup a non production OpenBSD 4.8 server as a test machine with compiler installed and use it to... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: lcxpics
1 Replies

7. Solaris

SNMP application for production environment

Hi Is there any default/open source snmp application to send traps monitor some processes in Solaris has MIB package available that can be used in production environment I am using SunOS Server1 5.10 Generic_142910-17 i86pc i386 i86pc If it has a GUI its a plus :) (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kashif_islam
1 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ksh to check second time difference between two servers

I am currently setting up a public key authentication between servers. The goal is to get the date via `ssh hostname date` on all the 4 remote servers , put the value in a text file on the central server and compare the date (specifically seconds) for each server date output to check if time is... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: depam
7 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Switching from production to development envirornment in UNIX

I had a unix scripts in prod. I need to made changes in those scripts which I don't have the edit access. I need to move those scripts from prod to dev to edit. Please tell me how to switch from production to development, So that I can made changes in dev and again move those scripts to Prod. ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Rajeswararao
3 Replies

10. HP-UX

Sudden application crash in servers

Hi, This weekend there was a sudden application crash in the server. I did not know where to start to investigate the problem, so I first looked into the /var/adm/syslog/syslog.log, and this was what I found : Dec 17 00:38:02 L28bi01 sshd: error: accept: No buffer space available Dec 17... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: anaigini45
9 Replies
BUNDLE-INSTALL(1)														 BUNDLE-INSTALL(1)

NAME
bundle-install - Install the dependencies specified in your Gemfile SYNOPSIS
bundle install [--gemfile=GEMFILE] [--path PATH] [--system] [--without=GROUP1[ GROUP2...]] [--local] [--deployment] [--binstubs[=DIRECTORY]] [--standalone[=GROUP1[ GROUP2...]]] [--quiet] DESCRIPTION
Install the gems specified in your Gemfile(5). If this is the first time you run bundle install (and a Gemfile.lock does not exist), bundler will fetch all remote sources, resolve dependencies and install all needed gems. If a Gemfile.lock does exist, and you have not updated your Gemfile(5), bundler will fetch all remote sources, but use the dependencies specified in the Gemfile.lock instead of resolving dependencies. If a Gemfile.lock does exist, and you have updated your Gemfile(5), bundler will use the dependencies in the Gemfile.lock for all gems that you did not update, but will re-resolve the dependencies of gems that you did update. You can find more information about this update process below under CONSERVATIVE UPDATING. OPTIONS
--gemfile=<gemfile> The location of the Gemfile(5) that bundler should use. This defaults to a gemfile in the current working directory. In general, bundler will assume that the location of the Gemfile(5) is also the project root, and will look for the Gemfile.lock and ven- dor/cache relative to it. --path=<path> The location to install the gems in the bundle to. This defaults to the gem home, which is the location that gem install installs gems to. This means that, by default, gems installed without a --path setting will show up in gem list. This setting is a remembered option. --system Installs the gems in the bundle to the system location. This overrides any previous remembered use of --path. --without=<list> A space-separated list of groups to skip installing. This is a remembered option. --local Do not attempt to connect to rubygems.org, instead using just the gems already present in Rubygems' cache or in vendor/cache. Note that if a more appropriate platform-specific gem exists on rubygems.org, it will not be found. --deployment Switches bundler's defaults into deployment mode. Do not use this flag on development machines. --binstubs[=<directory>] Create a directory (defaults to bin) containing an executable that runs in the context of the bundle. For instance, if the rails gem comes with a rails executable, this flag will create a bin/rails executable that ensures that all dependencies used come from the bundled gems. --shebang ruby-install-name Uses the ruby executable (usually ruby) provided to execute the scripts created with --binstubs. For instance, if you use --binstubs with --shebang jruby, all executables will be created to use jruby instead. --standalone[=<list>] Make a bundle that can work without Ruby Gems or Bundler at runtime. It takes a space separated list of groups to install. It cre- ates a bundle directory and installs the bundle there. It also generates a bundle/bundler/setup.rb file to replace Bundler's own setup. DEPLOYMENT MODE
Bundler's defaults are optimized for development. To switch to defaults optimized for deployment, use the --deployment flag. Do not acti- vate deployment mode on development machines, as it will cause in an error when the Gemfile is modified. 1. A Gemfile.lock is required. To ensure that the same versions of the gems you developed with and tested with are also used in deployments, a Gemfile.lock is required. This is mainly to ensure that you remember to check your Gemfile.lock into version control. 2. The Gemfile.lock must be up to date In development, you can modify your Gemfile(5) and re-run bundle install to conservatively update your Gemfile.lock snapshot. In deployment, your Gemfile.lock should be up-to-date with changes made in your Gemfile(5). 3. Gems are installed to vendor/bundle not your default system location In development, it's convenient to share the gems used in your application with other applications and other scripts run on the system. In deployment, isolation is a more important default. In addition, the user deploying the application may not have permission to install gems to the system, or the web server may not have permission to read them. As a result, bundle install --deployment installs gems to the vendor/bundle directory in the application. This may be overridden using the --path option. SUDO USAGE
By default, bundler installs gems to the same location as gem install. In some cases, that location may not be writable by your Unix user. In that case, bundler will stage everything in a temporary directory, then ask you for your sudo password in order to copy the gems into their system location. From your perspective, this is identical to installing them gems directly into the system. You should never use sudo bundle install. This is because several other steps in bundle install must be performed as the current user: o Updating your Gemfile.lock o Updating your vendor/cache, if necessary o Checking out private git repositories using your user's SSH keys Of these three, the first two could theoretically be performed by chowning the resulting files to $SUDO_USER. The third, however, can only be performed by actually invoking the git command as the current user. Therefore, git gems are downloaded and installed into ~/.bundle rather than $GEM_HOME or $BUNDLE_PATH. As a result, you should run bundle install as the current user, and bundler will ask for your password if it is needed to put the gems into their final location. INSTALLING GROUPS
By default, bundle install will install all gems in all groups in your Gemfile(5), except those declared for a different platform. However, you can explicitly tell bundler to skip installing certain groups with the --without option. This option takes a space-separated list of groups. While the --without option will skip installing the gems in the specified groups, it will still download those gems and use them to resolve the dependencies of every gem in your Gemfile(5). This is so that installing a different set of groups on another machine (such as a production server) will not change the gems and versions that you have already developed and tested against. Bundler offers a rock-solid guarantee that the third-party code you are running in development and testing is also the third-party code you are running in production. You can choose to exclude some of that code in different environments, but you will never be caught flat-footed by different versions of third-party code being used in different environments. For a simple illustration, consider the following Gemfile(5): source "http://rubygems.org" gem "sinatra" group :production do gem "rack-perftools-profiler" end In this case, sinatra depends on any version of Rack (>= 1.0, while rack-perftools-profiler depends on 1.x (~> 1.0). When you run bundle install --without production in development, we look at the dependencies of rack-perftools-profiler as well. That way, you do not spend all your time developing against Rack 2.0, using new APIs unavailable in Rack 1.x, only to have bundler switch to Rack 1.2 when the production group is used. This should not cause any problems in practice, because we do not attempt to install the gems in the excluded groups, and only evaluate as part of the dependency resolution process. This also means that you cannot include different versions of the same gem in different groups, because doing so would result in different sets of dependencies used in development and production. Because of the vagaries of the dependency resolution process, this usually affects more than just the gems you list in your Gemfile(5), and can (surprisingly) radically change the gems you are using. REMEMBERED OPTIONS
Some options (marked above in the OPTIONS section) are remembered between calls to bundle install, and by the Bundler runtime. For instance, if you run bundle install --without test, a subsequent call to bundle install that does not include a --without flag will remember your previous choice. In addition, a call to Bundler.setup will not attempt to make the gems in those groups available on the Ruby load path, as they were not installed. The settings that are remembered are: --deployment At runtime, this remembered setting will also result in Bundler raising an exception if the Gemfile.lock is out of date. --path Subsequent calls to bundle install will install gems to the directory originally passed to --path. The Bundler runtime will look for gems in that location. You can revert this option by running bundle install --system. --binstubs Bundler will update the executables every subsequent call to bundle install. --without As described above, Bundler will skip the gems specified by --without in subsequent calls to bundle install. The Bundler runtime will also not try to make the gems in the skipped groups available. THE GEMFILE.LOCK When you run bundle install, Bundler will persist the full names and versions of all gems that you used (including dependencies of the gems specified in the Gemfile(5)) into a file called Gemfile.lock. Bundler uses this file in all subsequent calls to bundle install, which guarantees that you always use the same exact code, even as your application moves across machines. Because of the way dependency resolution works, even a seemingly small change (for instance, an update to a point-release of a dependency of a gem in your Gemfile(5)) can result in radically different gems being needed to satisfy all dependencies. As a result, you SHOULD check your Gemfile.lock into version control. If you do not, every machine that checks out your repository (includ- ing your production server) will resolve all dependencies again, which will result in different versions of third-party code being used if any of the gems in the Gemfile(5) or any of their dependencies have been updated. CONSERVATIVE UPDATING
When you make a change to the Gemfile(5) and then run bundle install, Bundler will update only the gems that you modified. In other words, if a gem that you did not modify worked before you called bundle install, it will continue to use the exact same versions of all dependencies as it used before the update. Let's take a look at an example. Here's your original Gemfile(5): source "http://rubygems.org" gem "actionpack", "2.3.8" gem "activemerchant" In this case, both actionpack and activemerchant depend on activesupport. The actionpack gem depends on activesupport 2.3.8 and rack ~> 1.1.0, while the activemerchant gem depends on activesupport >= 2.3.2, braintree >= 2.0.0, and builder >= 2.0.0. When the dependencies are first resolved, Bundler will select activesupport 2.3.8, which satisfies the requirements of both gems in your Gemfile(5). Next, you modify your Gemfile(5) to: source "http://rubygems.org" gem "actionpack", "3.0.0.rc" gem "activemerchant" The actionpack 3.0.0.rc gem has a number of new dependencies, and updates the activesupport dependency to = 3.0.0.rc and the rack depen- dency to ~> 1.2.1. When you run bundle install, Bundler notices that you changed the actionpack gem, but not the activemerchant gem. It evaluates the gems currently being used to satisfy its requirements: activesupport 2.3.8 also used to satisfy a dependency in activemerchant, which is not being updated rack ~> 1.1.0 not currently being used to satify another dependency Because you did not explicitly ask to update activemerchant, you would not expect it to suddenly stop working after updating actionpack. However, satisfying the new activesupport 3.0.0.rc dependency of actionpack requires updating one of its dependencies. Even though activemerchant declares a very loose dependency that theoretically matches activesupport 3.0.0.rc, bundler treats gems in your Gemfile(5) that have not changed as an atomic unit together with their dependencies. In this case, the activemerchant dependency is treated as activemerchant 1.7.1 + activesupport 2.3.8, so bundle install will report that it cannot update actionpack. To explicitly update actionpack, including its dependencies which other gems in the Gemfile(5) still depend on, run bundle update action- pack (see bundle update(1)). Summary: In general, after making a change to the Gemfile(5) , you should first try to run bundle install, which will guarantee that no other gems in the Gemfile(5) are impacted by the change. If that does not work, run bundle update(1) bundle-update.1.html. June 2012 BUNDLE-INSTALL(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy