yep, you are rite.
Maybe i wrote a little confused, English isnt my mother tongue...
Anyway, rite now I got 100 files each with 1'050'000 rows, just one column.
Every file is a specific point of time.
I want an average for each line over all the 100 files (Line 1 for all 100 files, Line 2 ...).
However, I need to start averaging at a specific line, something ard 380'000.
These first 380'000 rows are coordinate points.
I think first I need to join the files, that I get one file with 1'050'000 rows and 100 columns. I tried:
just for two files, but it isnt working.
It seems that there is a limit for the lenght of the files...
Hi,
I have 20 files which have respective 50 lines with different values.
I would like to process each line of the 50 lines in these 20 files one at a time and do an average of 3rd field ($3) of these 20 files. This will be output to an output file.
Instead of using join to generate whole... (8 Replies)
I have a file that looks like this
452 025_E3
8 025_E3
82 025_F5
135 025_F5
5 025_F5
23 025_G2
38 025_G2
71 025_G2
9 026_A12
81 026_A12
10 026_A12
some of the elements in column2 are repeated.
I want an output file that will extract the... (1 Reply)
Hi,
first, I have searched in the forum for this, but I could not find the right answer. (There were some similar threads, but I was not sure how to adapt the ideas.)
Anyway, I have a quite natural problem: Given are several text files. All files contain the same number of lines and the same... (3 Replies)
This code works perfect when using a machine with only one interface online. (Excluding the loopback of course) But when I have other interface up for vmware or a vpn the output gets mixed up. I know I had this working when I was just reading ip's from files so I know it is not a problem with... (8 Replies)
Hello there,
I found an elegant solution to computing average values from multiple text files
awk '{for (i=1;i<=NF;i++){if ($i!~"n/a"){a+=$i}else{b++}}}END{for (i=1;i<=FNR;i++){for (j=1;j<=NF;j++){printf (a/(3-b))((b>0)?"~"b" ":" ")};printf "\n"}}' file1 file2 file3
I tried to modify... (2 Replies)
I have several sequential files with name stat.1000, stat.1001....to stat.1020 with a format like this
0.01 1 3822 4.97379915032e-14 4.96982253992e-09 0
0.01 3822 1 4.97379915032e-14 4.96982253992e-09 0
0.01 2 502 0.00993165137406 993.165137406 0
0.01 502 2 0.00993165137406 993.165137406 0... (6 Replies)
Hi all,
I have a list of numbers. I need an awk command to find out the numbers of elements (number of numbers, sort to speak), the average value the min and max value. Reading the list only once, with awk.
Any ideas?
Thanks! (5 Replies)
Hi,
I want to rename several files like this:
example:
A0805120817.BHN
A0805120818.BHN
.....
to:
20120817.0805.N
20120818.0805.N
......
How can i do this via terminal or in shell bash script ?
thanks, (6 Replies)
I have the following format of input from multiple files
File 1
24.01 -81.01 1.0
24.02 -81.02 5.0
24.03 -81.03 0.0
File 2
24.01 -81.01 2.0
24.02 -81.02 -5.0
24.03 -81.03 10.0
I need to scan through the files and when the first 2 columns match I... (18 Replies)
I need your help to discover missing elements for each box.
In theory each box should have 4 items: ITEM01, ITEM02, ITEM08, and ITEM10.
Some boxes either have a missing item (BOX02 ITEM08) or might have da duplicate item (BOX03 ITEM02) and missing another one (BOX03 ITEM01).
file01.txt
... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alex2005
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT MINIX
pnmscalefixed
pnmscalefixed(1) General Commands Manual pnmscalefixed(1)NAME
pnmscalefixed - scale a portable anymap quickly, but less accurate
DESCRIPTION
pnmscalefixed is the same thing as pnmscale except that it uses fixed point arithmetic internally instead of floating point, which makes it
run faster. In turn, it is less accurate and may distort the image.
Use the pnmscale man page with pnmscalefixed. This man page only describes the difference.
pnmscalefixed uses fixed point 12 bit arithmetic. By contrast, pnmscale uses floating point arithmetic which on most machines is probably
24 bit precision. This makes pnmscalefixed run faster (30% faster in one experiment), but the imprecision can cause distortions at the
right and bottom edges.
The distortion takes the following form: One pixel from the edge of the input is rendered larger in the output than the scaling factor
requires. Consequently, the rest of the image is smaller than the scaling factor requires, because the overall dimensions of the image are
always as requested. This distortion will usually be very hard to see.
pnmscalefixed with the -verbose option tells you how much distortion there is.
The amount of distortion depends on the size of the input image and how close the scaling factor is to an integral 1/4096th.
If the scaling factor is an exact multiple of 1/4096, there is no distortion. So, for example doubling or halving an image causes no dis-
tortion. But reducing it or enlarging it by a third would cause some distortion. To consider an extreme case, scaling a 100,000 row image
down to 50,022 rows would create an output image with all of the input squeezed into the top 50,000 rows, and the last row of the input
copied into the bottom 22 rows of output.
pnmscalefixed could probably be modified to use 16 bit or better arithmetic without losing anything. The modification would consist of a
single constant in the source code. Until there is a demonstrated need for that, though, the Netpbm maintainer wants to keep the safety
cushion afforded by the original 12 bit precision.
pnmscalefixed does not have pnmscale 's -nomix option.
18 November 2000 pnmscalefixed(1)