|
|
Sponsored Content
Special Forums
IP Networking
Specific routing problem help needed
Post 302216752 by aerostar700 on Monday 21st of July 2008 05:50:09 AM
07-21-2008
Specific routing problem help needed
Hi,
I am trying to set up the following :
- One linux box connected to the net, static address, eth0
- No other eth interface on the box
I want to set up this box in a way it can accept remote connections, like pptp tunnels (which seems the easier to set up unless you have other idea) through its public IP address THEN give unrestricted access to the net to these connected users from that same public IP address.
I a nutshell I want to set up a relay machine that can be anywhere on the net. Part of a design project for a large architecture scale thing that I have to think about.
I have set up the box, pptpd server, battled with windows temperemental details and now I can connect a windows client to that box except ... that from the windows station I cannot go anywhere
I thought like in the old days, putting proxyarp and defaultroute into the ppp config would do the trick, well, looks I'm sadly mistaken
Of couse, to save time, the ip_forwad is set, the ip_filter is shut down, and all the things are working ... except that.
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks
Michel
I am trying to set up the following :
- One linux box connected to the net, static address, eth0
- No other eth interface on the box
I want to set up this box in a way it can accept remote connections, like pptp tunnels (which seems the easier to set up unless you have other idea) through its public IP address THEN give unrestricted access to the net to these connected users from that same public IP address.
I a nutshell I want to set up a relay machine that can be anywhere on the net. Part of a design project for a large architecture scale thing that I have to think about.
I have set up the box, pptpd server, battled with windows temperemental details and now I can connect a windows client to that box except ... that from the windows station I cannot go anywhere
I thought like in the old days, putting proxyarp and defaultroute into the ppp config would do the trick, well, looks I'm sadly mistakenOf couse, to save time, the ip_forwad is set, the ip_filter is shut down, and all the things are working ... except that.
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks
Michel
|
|
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. IP Networking
Hi
I know this problem is more likely some windows problem but it has also something to do with unix.
We have a windows nt environment wich uses AIX (unix) machines as file servers (samba). In our windows network environment we nicely see al the unix file servers via the 10 MB network. Last... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mark Detrez
2 Replies
2. IP Networking
following Problem.
I configured my SuSE Linux 8.0 as a router. I4l, named, ip_forward, iptables (NAT/MASQUERADING) are running or are aktivatet.
I just can get a internet connection about the proxy server squid, but if i want to use other protocols i need functional routing.
(I had this... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: razor
1 Replies
3. IP Networking
I have a question concerning networking. Could any forum
members explain to me why I might be getting "no route
to host" messages when I try to connect through ftp and
http protocols?
I have went to my etc/hosts file and everything seems to be
configured properly. I can connect within my... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cstovall
1 Replies
4. IP Networking
hi,
below is the situation:
my server is in 128.10.200.xxx network.
i have a solaris computer running in a subnet. this computer got 2 nic card.
1 is 172.18.198.xxx , another 1 is 10.100.xxx.11
there is a machine stick with this computer, ip is 10.100.xxx.12
so, 10.100.xxx.11 and... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kyhah
3 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi,
I got problem of Sun Solaris 8 routing.
IP of SunA is 10.16.64.164, and have routing table:
10.16.64.0 10.16.64.164 U 1 19236 bge1
10.6.0.0 10.6.0.3 U 1 16534 bge0
224.0.0.0 10.6.0.3 U 1 ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: milo
4 Replies
6. Red Hat
hi,
having an issue on a class C network with trying to get a redhat diskless setup going. I am using oracle enterprise 5, which is RHEL 5.3 i believe.
here is the scenario:
sun sparc m4k that i am planning on making the red hat boxes boot off after i get the network issue fixed.
... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: caddyjoe77
3 Replies
7. AIX
I need the following solution , please help me...
Current situation
ip: 192.168.0.12 persistent and 192.168.254.12 service ip
gateway: 192.168.0.254
subnet: 255.255.255.0
i have added a new ip on a new nic
ip: 10.10.255.40
gateway: 10.10.255.62
subnet: 255.255.255.224
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rajibimran
1 Replies
8. IP Networking
hi guys!
I was searching few days for a solution to my problem but haven't found one or I'm too dumb to understand.
Here's what happened:
I have a linux server used as a router. It has an eth0 and eth1 (local interface). I just installed openvpn (I need it only as a client), I configured it and... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: shamora
0 Replies
9. IP Networking
Internet Gateway
192.168.0.201
Server 1
192.168.0.101
192.168.1.101
192.168.2.101
gateway: 192.168.0.201
VIP: 192.168.1.100
VIP: 192.168.2.100
Server 2
192.168.0.102
192.168.1.102
192.168.2.102
gateway: 192.168.0.201
Client 1
192.168.2.201
gateway: 192.168.2.100 (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hopfensp
1 Replies
10. Solaris
Hi,
I have two physical interfaces on a servers.
We have connected them to differerent subnets.
1) First interface:
10.158.49.87 to newtwork 10.158.49.0, its gateway is 10.158.49.1
(It is added as default gateway)
It is existing set up. It works well
2) Second interface:
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sri243
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
multinet
MULTINET(8) System Manager's Manual MULTINET(8) NAME
multinet - Connect to a Multinet* DECnet over IP server SYNOPSIS
multinet [options] <local-decnet-addr> <remote-host> DESCRIPTION
This utility creates a tapX device and copies all the DECnet packets from that over IP to a remote Multinet* server. It provides a way to connect a Linux box to a remote VMS machine over an IP-only network. Using Linux routing it should be possible to connect DECnet networks over the internet using this technique. local-decnet-addr DECnet node address of the tapX interface. This need not be the same as the address used on other interfaces but it might be less confusing if it is. remote-host IP address or host name of the remote Multinet server. If you send a HUP signal to the process it will lookup this name again, so you don't need to restart the server if the remote node changes its IP address. *Multinet is a product, and probably a trademark, of Process Software. http://www.process.com and is available free for hobbyist use. The protocol used here was reverse engineered by Mark Berryman and Christine Caulfield. OPTIONS
-v Be verbose and dump packet contents to stderr -1 Advertise as a level 1 router -2 Advertise as a level 2 router (default) -D Make the tapX device into the default DECnet device. This will force all traffic to non-local nodes down the Multinet link. IMPOR- TANT: Due to a kernel bug you should not use this option unless you are using a Linux kernel version 2.6.17 or later. -p priority Router priority. Default is 64 -P port Port to talk to Multinet on (default is 700). Ony change this if you know the Multinet server is listening on a different port -m MTU Maximum size of packets. (default 576) -t secs Timeout for IP connections. If no traffic is seen on the IP connection after this time then the daemon will attempt to restart it. -H hello timer How often HELLO messages are sent (default 60) in seconds. EXAMPLES
multinet -1 -D 3.2 zarqon.tykepenguin.com SEE ALSO
dnroute(8), ip(8) DECnet utilities March 30 2006 MULTINET(8)