Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: memset vs calloc
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users memset vs calloc Post 302215489 by osulinux on Wednesday 16th of July 2008 12:49:12 PM
Old 07-16-2008
calloc() is usually used to create arrays. It's sort of like malloc() in that it allocates memory, but calloc() as shamrock points out sets the allocated memory to 0.

The effect of calloc() is the same as doing malloc() followed by memset().
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

about memset fuction

Dear all, In my code,i am planning to use memset function to re-initialise an array before populating it everytime. Will using memset function be an overload to the program? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ranj@chn
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

questions in memset

HI all , please find the piece of code below char *t; char *f; char buf; memset(buf,0,50); after that i am assigning memory for (i=0; i<100; i++) { t = buf+(i*6); f = "ARUN"; } my question .. 1) i have run this it is... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: arunkumar_mca
7 Replies

3. Solaris

application Crashes on memset ?? any suggestions

Hi All, we have an application that is written in 'C' programming to connects to various servers in the organization. The bellow code establish a TCP connection to connect to the remote servers. the application works perfectly ok, but, after some time the entire process get's crashed and... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sudharma
2 Replies

4. Programming

C bzero() to memset() issue

Hi guys, my tool works fine in gentoo, ubuntu now im trying to port it to windows but bzero/bcopy I read aren't working on windows and for better portability I should of use memset() so im trying to translate bzero(buffer,256);in printf("MAIL TO"); strcpy(buffer, rcp); ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jess83
4 Replies

5. Programming

Calloc C++

Hello all, I have a confusion with calloc function : wz. the difference between the following 2 statemnts: char *ptr; char = (char*)calloc(num, sizeof(char)); char = (char*)calloc(num, sizeof(char*)); Am really confused!!!!! ---------- Post updated at 09:32 AM... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mind@work
1 Replies

6. Programming

Iterating and calloc questions.

Whilst creating the function readjust_descr I have stumble across what may be a problem or something that might just work. I was hoping someone could look at the code below and tell me if readjust_descr will clear all null pointers from the structure descr_list. struct descr descr_list =... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Errigour
6 Replies

7. Programming

calloc fails: 'Cannot allocate memory'

Hi , experts. I work on Linux station (RedHat 5.7), regular user, but have root password. %> uname -a Linux ran1log06 2.6.18-238.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jan 4 13:32:19 EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux %> cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client release 5.7 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: baruchgu
5 Replies

8. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

Memset fails on Solaris

Hi, memset call is failing on solaris for me. I wrote below code and that also fails. Any hints? void *memset(void *dst, int c, size_t n) { if (n) { char *d = dst; do { *d++ = c; } while (--n); } return dst; } (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: skyineyes
2 Replies
MALLOC(3)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 MALLOC(3)

NAME
calloc, malloc, free, realloc - Allocate and free dynamic memory SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h> void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size); void *malloc(size_t size); void free(void *ptr); void *realloc(void *ptr, size_t size); DESCRIPTION
calloc() allocates memory for an array of nmemb elements of size bytes each and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is set to zero. malloc() allocates size bytes and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is not cleared. free() frees the memory space pointed to by ptr, which must have been returned by a previous call to malloc(), calloc() or realloc(). Oth- erwise, or if free(ptr) has already been called before, undefined behaviour occurs. If ptr is NULL, no operation is performed. realloc() changes the size of the memory block pointed to by ptr to size bytes. The contents will be unchanged to the minimum of the old and new sizes; newly allocated memory will be uninitialized. If ptr is NULL, the call is equivalent to malloc(size); if size is equal to zero, the call is equivalent to free(ptr). Unless ptr is NULL, it must have been returned by an earlier call to malloc(), calloc() or realloc(). RETURN VALUE
For calloc() and malloc(), the value returned is a pointer to the allocated memory, which is suitably aligned for any kind of variable, or NULL if the request fails. free() returns no value. realloc() returns a pointer to the newly allocated memory, which is suitably aligned for any kind of variable and may be different from ptr, or NULL if the request fails. If size was equal to 0, either NULL or a pointer suitable to be passed to free() is returned. If real- loc() fails the original block is left untouched - it is not freed or moved. CONFORMING TO
ANSI-C SEE ALSO
brk(2), posix_memalign(3) NOTES
The Unix98 standard requires malloc(), calloc(), and realloc() to set errno to ENOMEM upon failure. Glibc assumes that this is done (and the glibc versions of these routines do this); if you use a private malloc implementation that does not set errno, then certain library routines may fail without having a reason in errno. Crashes in malloc(), free() or realloc() are almost always related to heap corruption, such as overflowing an allocated chunk or freeing the same pointer twice. Recent versions of Linux libc (later than 5.4.23) and GNU libc (2.x) include a malloc implementation which is tunable via environment vari- ables. When MALLOC_CHECK_ is set, a special (less efficient) implementation is used which is designed to be tolerant against simple errors, such as double calls of free() with the same argument, or overruns of a single byte (off-by-one bugs). Not all such errors can be protected against, however, and memory leaks can result. If MALLOC_CHECK_ is set to 0, any detected heap corruption is silently ignored; if set to 1, a diagnostic is printed on stderr; if set to 2, abort() is called immediately. This can be useful because otherwise a crash may happen much later, and the true cause for the problem is then very hard to track down. Linux follows an optimistic memory allocation strategy. This means that when malloc() returns non-NULL there is no guarantee that the mem- ory really is available. In case it turns out that the system is out of memory, one or more processes will be killed by the infamous OOM killer. GNU
1993-04-04 MALLOC(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy