Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: q on memmove()
Top Forums Programming q on memmove() Post 302213340 by Roman Voznyuk on Wednesday 9th of July 2008 09:59:26 PM
Old 07-09-2008
Performance.

If you are sure that buffer are not overlapped, you should use memcpy, becuase it's faster
 

We Also Found This Discussion For You

1. Red Hat

Memmove fail on 4 Gb+ raster under RHEL 64 bit

I'm rotating huge image rasters (1+ GB) using a 3-shear algorithm. I rotate 'in-place' after reallocating the raster. A necessary first step is reorganizing the image in the new raster dimensions that will exist after the rotation. RGBA pixels byte packed into uint32. The following code runs... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: imagtek
6 Replies
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy