You can change the shebang
to point to a ksh88 version of the shell. You will need to have one installed somewhere on your machine to get "vanilla" ksh behavior.
I wrote a script in ksh93 (the OS is AIX 5.2, ML7), which failed to run. After some testing i found out why, but the answer is a bit dissatisfying. Look for yourself:
#!/bin/ksh93
# --------- Step Names
typeset achStepName="foo"
typeset achStepName="bar"
typeset achStepName="fubar"... (3 Replies)
Hi,
I have a script that calls an external program to perform some calculations and then I read with "grep" and "sed" values from the output files. I've noticed that performance of KSH93 degrades with every iteration. The output files are all the same size, so I don't understand why after the... (2 Replies)
I am looking to create some ksh93 extensions using the custom builtin feature.
I can successfully create a builtin function, load it using the builtin -f command and get an output. However, I want to get/set values of KSH variables from within my built-in.
For example, lets say I am creating... (2 Replies)
This problem seems to be specific to ksh93.
If you run with set -x some scripts don't work properly. For example:
$ cat ksh.test2
] && print FUBAR! || print OK!
$
$ /bin/ksh93 ksh.test2
OK!
$ /bin/ksh93 -x ksh.test2
+ ]
+ print FUBAR!
FUBAR!
$
Trying to find out why this is... (8 Replies)
Solaris 11 ksh93 if condition issue
Has anyone run into issues with Solaris 11 with ksh93 if condition where it intermittently return wrong return code?
We did not see this issue in Solaris 10 with ksh88
Any thoughts? Thanks!
Solaris version: SunOS t52-ccc-28 5.11 11.2... (4 Replies)
Hi Experts,
I have several shell scripts that have been developed on a Linux box for korn ksh93.
If we want to run this software on an AIX 6.1 box that runs ksh88 by default can we just change the she-bang line to reference /bin/ksh93 which ships with AIX as its "enhanced shell" to ensure... (6 Replies)
My OS is Linux (kernel 4.08.something) and AIX (7100-04-01-1543), the used ksh versions are:
ksh88: Version M-11/16/88f (AIX)
ksh93: Version M 93t+ 2009-05-01 (AIX), Version M 93u (Linux)
When writing a parser for stanza files in ksh i encountered a rather strange behavior. Here is a... (4 Replies)
Hi everyone !
Im trying to know from wich version of AIX KSH93 is available ?
Internet tell me 6.x and 7.x AIX are available, bue what about 5.x ?
Is KSH93 available on AIX 5.x ?
Is it the same way to manipulate variables as KSH93 on 7.x ?
Thanks for your support and have a nice day ! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: majinfrede
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUNOS
shells
shells(4) File Formats shells(4)NAME
shells - shell database
SYNOPSIS
/etc/shells
DESCRIPTION
The shells file contains a list of the shells on the system. Applications use this file to determine whether a shell is valid. See getuser-
shell(3C). For each shell a single line should be present, consisting of the shell's path, relative to root.
A hash mark (#) indicates the beginning of a comment; subsequent characters up to the end of the line are not interpreted by the routines
which search the file. Blank lines are also ignored.
The following default shells are used by utilities: /bin/bash, /bin/csh, /bin/jsh, /bin/ksh, /bin/pfcsh, /bin/pfksh, /bin/pfsh, /bin/sh,
/bin/tcsh, /bin/zsh, /sbin/jsh, /sbin/sh, /usr/bin/bash, /usr/bin/csh, /usr/bin/jsh, /usr/bin/ksh, /usr/bin/pfcsh, /usr/bin/pfksh,
/usr/bin/pfsh, and /usr/bin/sh, /usr/bin/tcsh, /usr/bin/zsh. Note that /etc/shells overrides the default list.
Invalid shells in /etc/shells may cause unexpected behavior (such as being unable to log in by way of ftp(1)).
FILES
/etc/shells lists shells on system
SEE ALSO vipw(1B), ftpd(1M), sendmail(1M), getusershell(3C), aliases(4)SunOS 5.10 4 Jun 2001 shells(4)