|
|
Sponsored Content
Top Forums
UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Solaris and Linux system information.
Post 302156338 by sad_angle on Monday 7th of January 2008 10:50:34 PM
01-07-2008
This is Hardware comparison, not OS
I think that you need to compare hardware on the structure and micron level.
Xeon Woodcrest Preys On Opteron | Tom's Hardware
ftp://download.intel.com/design/Xeon...s/25039702.pdf.
Then build an idea about how UNIX systems are put together. (well put together)
Unix File System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
UNIX: System Design
Only then you can really give Solaris two thumbs up for Sparc/AMD hardware, and the same for Linux on x86, but not vice versa.
My personal history installing Linux Red Hat on Sparc ( and others like me who tried) is being disappointed at the lack of Linux drivers for SUN hardware. SUN still holds many of the Hardware design architecture proprietary. Thus giving you hard time with retrieval and display of data from and to I/O devices.
Great Raptor display cards, RPC units, SUN sound cards, and most importantly, the Oil fields equipment like quake sensors, ultra sound devices, and chemical analysis devices, fail to work with Linux, While SUN has given Solaris full armies of software drivers and applications for them.
Example; A few months ago an architecture firm requested me to check the possibility of migrating from SUN to Linux on their production line. They had pressure measuring devices that presses concrete cubes at 15, 28, 45, 60 days, until it cracks, giving the green or red light for a highway or a bridge to open or rebuild. I installed Linux on one of the hot swap drives, to find that Linux probed the massive hydraulic machines and installed them as a Xerox printers
. Calling the manufacturer Siemens® for hours and days to get the design of the circuit boards and internal OS data resulted in a dead end, as they have signed a deal with SUN to keep those kinds of machines internals proprietary. The suggestion to use the SUN CD driver that came with the machine as a platform to hack a new driver was not welcome at all, due to legal ramifications.
I think it depends on your industry.
If you are an ISP, Telecom, Education, Stock market & Financial, CAD Design (innovation of the individual is the core of the industry) go with Linux on x86.
If you are Oil, Chemicals, Conveyor belt, Health care labs, construction measurements (the machine is the industry's back bone) go with Solaris on Sparc/AMD.
Still, this is a humble personal point of view. I might be wrong.
Xeon Woodcrest Preys On Opteron | Tom's Hardware
ftp://download.intel.com/design/Xeon...s/25039702.pdf.
Then build an idea about how UNIX systems are put together. (well put together)
Unix File System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
UNIX: System Design
Only then you can really give Solaris two thumbs up for Sparc/AMD hardware, and the same for Linux on x86, but not vice versa.
My personal history installing Linux Red Hat on Sparc ( and others like me who tried) is being disappointed at the lack of Linux drivers for SUN hardware. SUN still holds many of the Hardware design architecture proprietary. Thus giving you hard time with retrieval and display of data from and to I/O devices.
Great Raptor display cards, RPC units, SUN sound cards, and most importantly, the Oil fields equipment like quake sensors, ultra sound devices, and chemical analysis devices, fail to work with Linux, While SUN has given Solaris full armies of software drivers and applications for them.
Example; A few months ago an architecture firm requested me to check the possibility of migrating from SUN to Linux on their production line. They had pressure measuring devices that presses concrete cubes at 15, 28, 45, 60 days, until it cracks, giving the green or red light for a highway or a bridge to open or rebuild. I installed Linux on one of the hot swap drives, to find that Linux probed the massive hydraulic machines and installed them as a Xerox printers
. Calling the manufacturer Siemens® for hours and days to get the design of the circuit boards and internal OS data resulted in a dead end, as they have signed a deal with SUN to keep those kinds of machines internals proprietary. The suggestion to use the SUN CD driver that came with the machine as a platform to hack a new driver was not welcome at all, due to legal ramifications. I think it depends on your industry.
If you are an ISP, Telecom, Education, Stock market & Financial, CAD Design (innovation of the individual is the core of the industry) go with Linux on x86.
If you are Oil, Chemicals, Conveyor belt, Health care labs, construction measurements (the machine is the industry's back bone) go with Solaris on Sparc/AMD.
Still, this is a humble personal point of view. I might be wrong.
|
|
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I'm just getting started with unix and would like to know 1) how to tell how big the harddrive is 2) how to tell if there are multiple harddrive installed on the machine 3) a relitavely easy way to tell what programs are installed on the machine.
I'm using Sun OS 5.6
Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ViperD
3 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi All,
I am new to Unix and am working on AIX ( rs6000 ). I am looking for the system info of the unix box like
1. Number of CPUs
2. CPU speed
3. RAM size
Your help is much appreciated
Thanks
rao. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: rao
6 Replies
3. HP-UX
How do I get the system information on a HP UNIX server. details like CPU speed, number of processors etc. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Olamide
4 Replies
4. HP-UX
Hi,
I'm writing a script to display a lot of information which describe a server (OS distrib, release, Hardware platform, CPU, HD, S/N...).
For Linux side it is ok as you have almost all the information in /proc/cpuinfo, /proc/meminfo... and you can use dmidecode but for HP-UX I didn't find... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: biker007fr
13 Replies
5. Solaris
Hello to everyone,
i am new to Sun Solaris. i have Solaris 5.10 installed on the X86 platform.
i am writing a script which gathers some system information. but i can not find some of the parameter from the system
can any one please suggest to way to find these params.
shell command will be... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: nikhil.sigpro
1 Replies
6. Infrastructure Monitoring
Hi,
How to get the Linux system hardware and software basic information using terminal command ?
Here below i have specified some of the information i need. Please have a look at this and guide me.
OS Name:
OS Version :
OS Manufacturer:
OS Configuration:
OS Build Type:... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: forumguest
6 Replies
7. Solaris
Hi,
How to get the Solaris system hardware and software basic information using terminal command with guest login?
Here below i have specified some of the information i need. Please have a look at this and guide me.
OS Name:
OS Version :
OS Manufacturer:
OS Configuration:
... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: forumguest
15 Replies
8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi
I was reading some weblog on the internet and someone made an interesting statement.
<quote>
Linux is kernel and solaris is operating system
</quote>
Honestly I don't understand the difference between term kernel and operating system in above quote.
Could you explain me more ?
thx... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: presul
4 Replies
9. Programming
Hi all
What is the qualification required by Linux/Solaris System Administrator to become a Linux/Solaris System Programmer as to gain complete knowledge on computers.
Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Tlogine
1 Replies
10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hello guys.
I wanted to find the System Configuration and Hardware Information on one of my servers. Here is part of the cpu info:
CPU core info:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ymir
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT OSX
uri::url5.12
URI::URL(3) User Contributed Perl Documentation URI::URL(3) NAME
URI::URL - Uniform Resource Locators SYNOPSIS
$u1 = URI::URL->new($str, $base); $u2 = $u1->abs; DESCRIPTION
This module is provided for backwards compatibility with modules that depend on the interface provided by the "URI::URL" class that used to be distributed with the libwww-perl library. The following differences exist compared to the "URI" class interface: o The URI::URL module exports the url() function as an alternate constructor interface. o The constructor takes an optional $base argument. The "URI::URL" class is a subclass of "URI::WithBase". o The URI::URL->newlocal class method is the same as URI::file->new_abs. o URI::URL::strict(1) o $url->print_on method o $url->crack method o $url->full_path: same as ($uri->abs_path || "/") o $url->netloc: same as $uri->authority o $url->epath, $url->equery: same as $uri->path, $uri->query o $url->path and $url->query pass unescaped strings. o $url->path_components: same as $uri->path_segments (if you don't consider path segment parameters) o $url->params and $url->eparams methods o $url->base method. See URI::WithBase. o $url->abs and $url->rel have an optional $base argument. See URI::WithBase. o $url->frag: same as $uri->fragment o $url->keywords: same as $uri->query_keywords o $url->localpath and friends map to $uri->file. o $url->address and $url->encoded822addr: same as $uri->to for mailto URI o $url->groupart method for news URI o $url->article: same as $uri->message SEE ALSO
URI, URI::WithBase COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1998-2000 Gisle Aas. perl v5.12.5 2011-08-13 URI::URL(3)