Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: weird behavior of grep -P
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting weird behavior of grep -P Post 302152620 by pankai on Thursday 20th of December 2007 03:24:34 PM
Old 12-20-2007
weird behavior of grep -P

I met a problem in using grep -P.

There is a text file, temp.txt, whose content is:
dddd
abc

I ran the command:

grep -P "\s*abc" temp.txt

The result I expected is:
abc

But, the actual result is:
dddd
abc

Could anyone tell me what is wrong?

Thanks.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Weird behavior on a Sun Fire V120 running solaris 10.

All, After a power loss I went to power on our sun fire v120 that is running solaris 10 and now it will not boot. I tried power cycling it from the lom and pulling the cord but nothing works. All it does is after a power cycle it will start to boot and then start to spit out a bunch of hex... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jsandova
2 Replies

2. OS X (Apple)

Weird rsync behavior

I use rsync to keep a directory in synchronization betwen a Linux box with the hostname brutal and a Mac running OS X 10.5 (Leopard) with the hostname cooper. When I run the following command on my Linux machine: rsync -avz --delete myuserid@cooper:/Library/WebServer/Documents... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: scotbuff
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Weird Behavior of a Script

ok, there's a script i'm working on written in shell programming. #!/bin/sh this script is written to spit out the contents of certain variables inside of it so the output looks something like this: server01=89 server02=69 server03=89 server04=76 now, when i run this script from the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
4 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Weird home key behavior

Hi there, I'm using putty to connect to several servers. On every remote machine, the home key takes me at the beginning of a command line. Exept on one machine where a press on the home key outputs the tilde sign (~). Is there any place where I can override this behavior, I really prefer my... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: chebarbudo
6 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk print behavior weird

Hi Experts I am facing a weird issue while using print statement in awk. I have a text file with 3 fields shown below: # cat f1 234,abc,1000 235,efg,2000 236,jih,3000 # When I print the third column alone, I dont face any issue as shown below: # awk '{print $3 }' FS=, f1 1000 2000... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: guruprasadpr
5 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Weird behavior of backslash, please help!!

Hi I am getting absurd behavior of escape character in echos as followed:oinlcso003{arsadm} #: echo "\as shdd" \as shdd oinlcso003{arsadm} #: echo "Well, isn't that \"special\"?" Well, isn't that "special"? oinlcso003{arsadm} #: echo "Well, isn't that \special\?" Well, isn't that \special\?... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: nixhead
3 Replies

7. UNIX and Linux Applications

weird yum behavior with provides and install

Why could whatprovides not lookup this info for over 10 minutes, but install could install that package in less than a minute? $ yum whatprovides */lsb_release Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit, versionlock ^Cupdates/group 18% 3.1 kB/s | 360 kB 08:28 ETA ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: cokedude
0 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Weird TR behavior. Replacing two instance

Can someone please explain what's wrong with the command i use below? tr -c '\11\12\40-\176' ' '< $TEMP_FILE > $TEMP_FILE2 The invalid character/s is replaced with two spaces, the string2 only have 1 space in it. Please help. Sample output: 333243,333244c333243,333244 < ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Jin_
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Weird behavior of Vi

Hi there, I am a bit puzzled by a weird behavior of Vi. I very simply would like to add increased numbers in some files. Since I have many thousands entries per file and many files, I would like to macro it in vi. To do this, I enter the first number ("0001") on the first line and then yank... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: hypsis
4 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Commenting out "expr" creates weird behavior

This really puzzles me. The following code gives me the error 'expr: syntax error' when I try to do multi-line comment using here document <<EOF echo "Sum is: `expr $1 + $2`" EOF Even if I explicitly comment out the line containing the expr using "#", the error message would still exist... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
3 Replies
subst(3tcl)						       Tcl Built-In Commands						       subst(3tcl)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

NAME
subst - Perform backslash, command, and variable substitutions SYNOPSIS
subst ?-nobackslashes? ?-nocommands? ?-novariables? string _________________________________________________________________ DESCRIPTION
This command performs variable substitutions, command substitutions, and backslash substitutions on its string argument and returns the fully-substituted result. The substitutions are performed in exactly the same way as for Tcl commands. As a result, the string argument is actually substituted twice, once by the Tcl parser in the usual fashion for Tcl commands, and again by the subst command. If any of the -nobackslashes, -nocommands, or -novariables are specified, then the corresponding substitutions are not performed. For example, if -nocommands is specified, command substitution is not performed: open and close brackets are treated as ordinary characters with no special interpretation. Note that the substitution of one kind can include substitution of other kinds. For example, even when the -novariables option is speci- fied, command substitution is performed without restriction. This means that any variable substitution necessary to complete the command substitution will still take place. Likewise, any command substitution necessary to complete a variable substitution will take place, even when -nocommands is specified. See the EXAMPLES below. If an error occurs during substitution, then subst will return that error. If a break exception occurs during command or variable substi- tution, the result of the whole substitution will be the string (as substituted) up to the start of the substitution that raised the excep- tion. If a continue exception occurs during the evaluation of a command or variable substitution, an empty string will be substituted for that entire command or variable substitution (as long as it is well-formed Tcl.) If a return exception occurs, or any other return code is returned during command or variable substitution, then the returned value is substituted for that substitution. See the EXAMPLES below. In this way, all exceptional return codes are "caught" by subst. The subst command itself will either return an error, or will complete successfully. EXAMPLES
When it performs its substitutions, subst does not give any special treatment to double quotes or curly braces (except within command sub- stitutions) so the script set a 44 subst {xyz {$a}} returns "xyz {44}", not "xyz {$a}" and the script set a "p} q {r" subst {xyz {$a}} returns "xyz {p} q {r}", not "xyz {p} q {r}". When command substitution is performed, it includes any variable substitution necessary to evaluate the script. set a 44 subst -novariables {$a [format $a]} returns "$a 44", not "$a $a". Similarly, when variable substitution is performed, it includes any command substitution necessary to retrieve the value of the variable. proc b {} {return c} array set a {c c [b] tricky} subst -nocommands {[b] $a([b])} returns "[b] c", not "[b] tricky". The continue and break exceptions allow command substitutions to prevent substitution of the rest of the command substitution and the rest of string respectively, giving script authors more options when processing text using subst. For example, the script subst {abc,[break],def} returns "abc,", not "abc,,def" and the script subst {abc,[continue;expr {1+2}],def} returns "abc,,def", not "abc,3,def". Other exceptional return codes substitute the returned value subst {abc,[return foo;expr {1+2}],def} returns "abc,foo,def", not "abc,3,def" and subst {abc,[return -code 10 foo;expr {1+2}],def} also returns "abc,foo,def", not "abc,3,def". SEE ALSO
Tcl(3tcl), eval(3tcl), break(3tcl), continue(3tcl) KEYWORDS
backslash substitution, command substitution, variable substitution Tcl 7.4 subst(3tcl)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy