Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: problem with signal()
Top Forums Programming problem with signal() Post 302145733 by narendra.pant on Thursday 15th of November 2007 04:34:47 AM
Old 11-15-2007
Error problem with signal()

#include<signal.h>
void suicide();
main()
{
printf("use CTRL \\ for exiting \n");
//signal(SIGINT,SIG_DFL);
signal(SIGQUIT,suicide);
for (;Smilie;
}

void suicide()
{ printf("hello here you r in the suicide code ");
}




i was just starting with signals .. and tried this ,, but in the above i am calling suicide function in the signal function , its not working why ??
also the default behavior of the <ctrl \ > is being suppressed .

can you tell me why it is so ,,
and when i tried it passing SIG_DFL it worked ..
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

[Problem] raise a signal in FreeBSD

I am trying to send a SIGUSR1 to a set of process. Please tell me how to do. I've tried the system call raise(int sig) but it just raise a signal of to the 'current process.' My program is about a network chat server. When a client connects in, The main process will fork a new process... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Namely
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

I have a problem using signal SIGUSR2

hi I have created a application which uses SIGUSR2. It send this signal to server and waits for signal SIGUSR2 from server after server performing some operation server sends SIGUSR2 back to the application. The application then quits. This works fine which ran from terminal , but when I... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: khan_069
3 Replies

3. Programming

Signal Problem

I am using the signal function, and passing it a function named quit procedure...I get the following warning.... passing arg2 of signal from incompatible pointer type... void quit_procedure(void); //this is the way i define my prototype... signal(SIGINT, quit_procedure); Please guide... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: jacques83
5 Replies

4. Programming

problem in SIGSEGV signal handling

i wrote handler for sigsegv such that i can allocate memory for a variable to which sigsegv generated for illlegal acces of memory. my code is #include <signal.h> #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<string.h> char *j; void segv_handler(int dummy) { j=(char *)malloc(10); ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pavan6754
4 Replies

5. Programming

problem in reforking and signal handling

hi friends i have a problem in signal handling ... let me explain my problem clearly.. i have four process .. main process forks two child process and each child process again forks another new process respectively... the problem is whenever i kill the child process it is reforking and the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: senvenugopal
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Tricky little problem, send signal to other machine without user

Hi everyone! I want to be able to send a signal to another machine on the same network, and have it trigger a script on that machine. Here's the reason why I can't just ssh: I don't have a username on that machine, but there is a user that is always logged on that I can do stuff on. So, I want... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: declannalced
5 Replies

7. Programming

UNIX signal problem

Hi all, Sorry about the title,at first i decided to ask a problem about the signal mechanism,however,i'm now figured it out.Sorry to forget modify the title:wall:.I had a small problem that if i use the code which is commented,the code would get a segment fault,while the above code NOT.what's... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: homeboy
4 Replies

8. Programming

problem in doing coding of signal handler

i m unble to execute code of signal handler using a) Wait b) Waitpid (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: madhura
1 Replies

9. Programming

Losing signal problem

I'm newbie in UNIX programming, I have a problem with signals. I'm writing multithread program, where threads can die at any moment. When thread dies it generates signal SIGUSR1 to main thread and then thread dies. Main thread gets a signal and waits for thread dead. I wrote program like this: ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: DendyGamer
5 Replies

10. Linux

Problem with dovecot (Killed with signal 15)

hey, i have been facing a very fatel error with dovecot.. i am getting this error in my dovecot.log file dovecot: Feb 13 15:21:02 Fatal: chdir(/var/mail/folders/user1) failed with uid 1001: Permission denied dovecot: Feb 13 15:21:02 Error: child 18732 (imap) returned error 89 dovecot: Feb... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: htshshrm2
3 Replies
thr_sigsetmask(3C)														thr_sigsetmask(3C)

NAME
thr_sigsetmask - change or examine calling thread's signal mask SYNOPSIS
cc -mt [ flag... ] file... [ library... ] #include <thread.h> #include <signal.h> int thr_sigsetmask(int how, const sigset_t *set, sigset_t *oset); The thr_sigsetmask() function changes or examines a calling thread's signal mask. Each thread has its own signal mask. A new thread inher- its the calling thread's signal mask and priority; however, pending signals are not inherited. Signals pending for a new thread will be empty. If the value of the argument set is not NULL, set points to a set of signals that can modify the currently blocked set. If the value of set is NULL, the value of how is insignificant and the thread's signal mask is unmodified; thus, thr_sigsetmask() can be used to inquire about the currently blocked signals. The value of the argument how specifies the method in which the set is changed and takes one of the following values: SIG_BLOCK set corresponds to a set of signals to block. They are added to the current signal mask. SIG_UNBLOCK set corresponds to a set of signals to unblock. These signals are deleted from the current signal mask. SIG_SETMASK set corresponds to the new signal mask. The current signal mask is replaced by set. If the value of oset is not NULL, it points to the location where the previous signal mask is stored. Upon successful completion, the thr_sigsetmask() function returns 0. Otherwise, it returns a non-zero value. The thr_sigsetmask() function will fail if: EINVAL The value of how is not defined and oset is NULL. Example 1: Create a default thread that can serve as a signal catcher/handler with its own signal mask. The following example shows how to create a default thread that can serve as a signal catcher/handler with its own signal mask. new will have a different value from the creator's signal mask. As POSIX threads and Solaris threads are fully compatible even within the same process, this example uses pthread_create(3C) if you exe- cute a.out 0, or thr_create(3C) if you execute a.out 1. In this example: o The sigemptyset(3C) function initializes a null signal set, new. The sigaddset(3C) function packs the signal, SIGINT, into that new set. o Either pthread_sigmask() or thr_sigsetmask() is used to mask the signal, SIGINT (CTRL-C), from the calling thread, which is main(). The signal is masked to guarantee that only the new thread will receive this signal. o pthread_create() or thr_create() creates the signal-handling thread. o Using pthread_join(3C) or thr_join(3C), main() then waits for the termination of that signal-handling thread, whose ID number is user_threadID. Then main() will sleep(3C) for 2 seconds, after which the program terminates. o The signal-handling thread, handler: o Assigns the handler interrupt() to handle the signal SIGINT by the call to sigaction(2). o Resets its own signal set to not block the signal, SIGINT. o Sleeps for 8 seconds to allow time for the user to deliver the signal SIGINT by pressing the CTRL-C. /* cc thisfile.c -lthread -lpthread */ #define _REENTRANT /* basic first 3-lines for threads */ #include <pthread.h> #include <thread.h> thread_t user_threadID; sigset_t new; void *handler(), interrupt(); int main( int argc, char *argv[] ){ test_argv(argv[1]); sigemptyset(&new); sigaddset(&new, SIGINT); switch(*argv[1]) { case '0': /* POSIX */ pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &new, NULL); pthread_create(&user_threadID, NULL, handler, argv[1]); pthread_join(user_threadID, NULL); break; case '1': /* Solaris */ thr_sigsetmask(SIG_BLOCK, &new, NULL); thr_create(NULL, 0, handler, argv[1], 0, &user_threadID); thr_join(user_threadID, NULL, NULL); break; } /* switch */ printf("thread handler, # %d, has exited ",user_threadID); sleep(2); printf("main thread, # %d is done ", thr_self()); return(0) } /* end main */ struct sigaction act; void * handler(char *argv1) { act.sa_handler = interrupt; sigaction(SIGINT, &act, NULL); switch(*argv1){ case '0': /* POSIX */ pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &new, NULL); break; case '1': /* Solaris */ thr_sigsetmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &new, NULL); break; } printf(" Press CTRL-C to deliver SIGINT signal to the process "); sleep(8); /* give user time to hit CTRL-C */ return (NULL) } void interrupt(int sig) { printf("thread %d caught signal %d ", thr_self(), sig); } void test_argv(char argv1[]) { if(argv1 == NULL) { printf("use 0 as arg1 to use thr_create(); or use 1 as arg1 to use pthread_create() "); exit(NULL); } } In the last example, the handler thread served as a signal-handler while also taking care of activity of its own (in this case, sleeping, although it could have been some other activity). A thread could be completely dedicated to signal-handling simply by waiting for the delivery of a selected signal by blocking with sigwait(2). The two subroutines in the previous example, handler() and interrupt(), could have been replaced with the following routine: void * handler(void *ignore) { int signal; printf("thread %d waiting for you to press the CTRL-C keys ", thr_self()); sigwait(&new, &signal); printf("thread %d has received the signal %d ", thr_self(), signal); } /*pthread_create() and thr_create() would use NULL instead of argv[1] for the arg passed to handler() */ In this routine, one thread is dedicated to catching and handling the signal specified by the set new, which allows main() and all of its other sub-threads, created after pthread_sigmask() or thr_sigsetmask() masked that signal, to continue uninterrupted. Any use of sig- wait(2) should be such that all threads block the signals passed to sigwait(2) at all times. Only the thread that calls sigwait() will get the signals. The call to sigwait(2) takes two arguments. For this type of background dedicated signal-handling routine, a Solaris daemon thread can be used by passing the argument THR_DAEMON to thr_create(). See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+------------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+------------------------------+ |MT-Level |MT-Safe and Async-Signal-Safe | +-----------------------------+------------------------------+ sigaction(2), sigprocmask(2), sigwait(2), cond_wait(3C), pthread_cancel(3C), pthread_create(3C), pthread_join(3C), pthread_self(3C), sigaddset(3C), sigemptyset(3C), sigsetops(3C), sleep(3C), attributes(5), cancellation(5), standards(5) It is not possible to block signals that cannot be caught or ignored (see sigaction(2)). It is also not possible to block or unblock SIG- CANCEL, as SIGCANCEL is reserved for the implementation of POSIX thread cancellation (see pthread_cancel(3C) and cancellation(5)). This restriction is quietly enforced by the standard C library. Using sigwait(2) in a dedicated thread allows asynchronously generated signals to be managed synchronously; however, sigwait(2) should never be used to manage synchronously generated signals. Synchronously generated signals are exceptions that are generated by a thread and are directed at the thread causing the exception. Since sigwait() blocks waiting for signals, the blocking thread cannot receive a synchronously generated signal. Calling thesigprocmask(2) function will be the same as if thr_sigsetmask() or pthread_sigmask() has been called. POSIX leaves the seman- tics of the call to sigprocmask(2) unspecified in a multi-threaded process, so programs that care about POSIX portability should not depend on this semantic. If a signal is delivered while a thread is waiting on a condition variable, the cond_wait(3C) function will be interrupted and the handler will be executed. The state of the lock protecting the condition variable is undefined while the thread is executing the signal handler. Signals that are generated synchronously should not be masked. If such a signal is blocked and delivered, the receiving process is killed. 23 Mar 2005 thr_sigsetmask(3C)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy