10-24-2007
Database is not much big so I didnot seperate db server. Tally is accounting software which eats around 50MB RAM.
But is it possible to get collective output of n number of PCs ?
For example: If my server requirement is 3 GB RAM and 3 Ghz CPU. Then instead of bying one server of that much capacity, can I use 3 PCs each of 1 GB RAM and 1 Ghz CPU ?
Thanks
NeeleshG
7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
hi
frnz, let me know how to configutre the veritas cluster.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Kbharat20
3 Replies
2. High Performance Computing
hello,
During the cluster installation, we are required to enter a cluster name. When this name is used?
I have a shared disk between those 2 nodes. To test NFS failover, what should I do?
PS: I am using VCS 5
thanks (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: melanie_pfefer
5 Replies
3. Solaris
I have 2 sun blade 1500 with Qlogic card and T3 storedge. I can connect to the T3 storedge through my boxes. Now I want to setup cluster, in order to setup I need to buy a Fiber Channel switch. Can I buy any fiber channel switch? Can you recommend some old switches? I can get it from ebay.
... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mokkan
4 Replies
4. High Performance Computing
Hi, I am not sure if the term "cluster" fits my situation or not. I have 5 Linux computers, each has different a host-name, and my users have to remember those the computer names to login and find out which computers have free CPUs, so they can run their jobs on those computers have free CPUs.
... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: hiepng
4 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi,
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32-bit. I would like to execute a command in two or more servers (multiple remote hosts) in parallel. The commands "shmux" or "on" are not available in Ubuntu. Could anyone tell me what other equivalent commands available in Ubuntu to accomplish this task? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
1 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi all,
we have setup one cluster with two nodes.
-drbd
-corosync
-pacemaker
-mysql
-piranha
sometimes, we loose connection between the two nodes (node 1 and node 2). When this happens, the two nodes starts both the services as masters,because they don't see each other.
is there any way... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: arrals_vl
2 Replies
7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
hi guys
Back in 2009 and 2010 I configured some clusters using Linux HA Heartbeat version 2.1.4 for suse 10 SP3
now I see Linux HA heartbeat is kind of outdated last release 2011, since I have to configure 2 new clusters I was wondering what do you recommend for cluster tool nowadays?
I... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: karlochacon
0 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
radrelay
RADRELAY(8) FreeRADIUS Daemon RADRELAY(8)
NAME
radrelay -- Deprecated command.
DESCRIPTION
The functions of radrelay have been added to radiusd. One benefit is that one instance of radiusd can read multiple detail files, among
others.
The rlm_sql_log module does something similar, but for SQL queries. See it's man page for details.
REPLICATION FOR BACKUPS
Many sites run multiple radius servers; at least one primary and one backup server. When the primary goes down, most NASes detect that and
switch to the backup server.
That will cause your accounting packets to go the the backup server - and some NASes don't even switch back to the primary server when it
comes back up.
The result is that accounting records are missed, and/or the administrator must jump through hoops in order to combine the different detail
files from multiple servers. It also means that the session database ("radutmp", used for radwho and simultaneous use detection) gets out
of sync.
We solve this issue by "relaying" packets from one server to another, so they both have the same set of accounting data.
See raddb/sites-available/buffered-sql for more information.
BUFFERING FOR HIGH-LOAD SERVERS
If the RADIUS server suddenly receives a many accounting packets, there may be insufficient CPU power to process them all in a timely man-
ner. This problem is especially noticable when the accounting packets are going to a back-end database.
Similarly, you may have one database that tracks "live" sessions, and another that tracks historical accounting data. In that case,
accessing the first database is fast, as it is small. Accessing the second database many be slower, as it may contain multiple gigabytes
of data. In addition, writing to the first database in a timely manner is important, while data may be written to the second database with
a few minutes delay, without any harm being done.
See raddb/sites-available/copy-to-home-server for more information.
SEE ALSO
radiusd(8), rlm_sql_log(5)
AUTHOR
The FreeRADIUS Server Project
23 October 2007 RADRELAY(8)