Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Routing problem of Solaris
Operating Systems Solaris Routing problem of Solaris Post 302130619 by milo on Tuesday 7th of August 2007 05:17:26 AM
Old 08-07-2007
Routing problem of Solaris

Hi,

I got problem of Sun Solaris 8 routing.

IP of SunA is 10.16.64.164, and have routing table:

10.16.64.0 10.16.64.164 U 1 19236 bge1
10.6.0.0 10.6.0.3 U 1 16534 bge0
224.0.0.0 10.6.0.3 U 1 0 bge0
default 10.16.64.1 UG 1 44741
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 457 lo0

Another SunB server is 10.24.64.160. From SunA traceroute to SunB, packet was sent to 10.16.64.3 instead of 10.16.64.1.

Additionally, this status is not stable. It means some time SunA sends packet to 10.16.64.1 and others, it sends to 10.16.64.3.

Appreciate all reply.

Thanks,
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

Routing problem

Hi I know this problem is more likely some windows problem but it has also something to do with unix. We have a windows nt environment wich uses AIX (unix) machines as file servers (samba). In our windows network environment we nicely see al the unix file servers via the 10 MB network. Last... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mark Detrez
2 Replies

2. IP Networking

routing problem

following Problem. I configured my SuSE Linux 8.0 as a router. I4l, named, ip_forward, iptables (NAT/MASQUERADING) are running or are aktivatet. I just can get a internet connection about the proxy server squid, but if i want to use other protocols i need functional routing. (I had this... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: razor
1 Replies

3. IP Networking

Routing Problem

I have a question concerning networking. Could any forum members explain to me why I might be getting "no route to host" messages when I try to connect through ftp and http protocols? I have went to my etc/hosts file and everything seems to be configured properly. I can connect within my... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cstovall
1 Replies

4. IP Networking

routing problem in solaris

hi, below is the situation: my server is in 128.10.200.xxx network. i have a solaris computer running in a subnet. this computer got 2 nic card. 1 is 172.18.198.xxx , another 1 is 10.100.xxx.11 there is a machine stick with this computer, ip is 10.100.xxx.12 so, 10.100.xxx.11 and... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kyhah
3 Replies

5. IP Networking

solaris 8 networking routing

hi all, how do i make sure that the new routing should take effect on the os memory right away? what should i run after i add all the new "route add ....". I have an example below: bash-2.03# netstat -rn Routing Table: IPv4 Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: itik
1 Replies

6. Solaris

ip routing in solaris

I have a SUN ultra 5 machine running Solaris 6. it has two ethernet interfaces qe0 192.168.0.111 and qe1 192.168.1.111 the two subnets are 192.168.0.111 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.111 255.255.255.0 the specified routes are add route -net 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.111 add route... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: adol65
3 Replies

7. IP Networking

solaris routing between two networks

ce0: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 10.162.212.132 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.162.212.255 ether 0:14:4f:55:82:9 ce1: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3 inet 10.231.11.232 netmask... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: busyboy
1 Replies

8. Solaris

solaris routing between two networks

ce0: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 10.162.212.132 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.162.212.255 ether 0:14:4f:55:82:9 ce1: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3 inet 10.231.11.232 netmask... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: busyboy
3 Replies

9. Solaris

Routing problem

Hi, I have two physical interfaces on a servers. We have connected them to differerent subnets. 1) First interface: 10.158.49.87 to newtwork 10.158.49.0, its gateway is 10.158.49.1 (It is added as default gateway) It is existing set up. It works well 2) Second interface: ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sri243
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Solaris Routing

Hello All, Problem is that redundancy doesn't work, probably a routing issue I need to get sorted out When 172.29.11.x net is down, neither node3 nor node4 is trying 172.29.12.x network,The problem lies in network 172.29.13.x if 172.29.11.x network is down, node3/node4 should route to... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: nadeemahmed
6 Replies
Route classifier in tc(8)					       Linux						 Route classifier in tc(8)

NAME
route - route traffic control filter SYNOPSIS
tc filter ... route [ from REALM | fromif TAG ] [ to REALM ] [ classid CLASSID ] [ action ACTION_SPEC ] DESCRIPTION
Match packets based on routing table entries. This filter centers around the possibility to assign a realm to routing table entries. For any packet to be classified by this filter, a routing table lookup is performed and the returned realm is used to decide on whether the packet is a match or not. OPTIONS
action ACTION_SPEC Apply an action from the generic actions framework on matching packets. classid CLASSID Push matching packets into the class identified by CLASSID. from REALM fromif TAG Perform source route lookups. TAG is the name of an interface which must be present on the system at the time of tc invocation. to REALM Match if normal (i.e., destination) routing returns the given REALM. EXAMPLES
Consider the subnet 192.168.2.0/24 being attached to eth0: ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth0 realm 2 The following route filter will then match packets from that subnet: tc filter add ... route from 2 classid 1:2 and pass packets on to class 1:2. NOTES
Due to implementation details, realm values must be in a range from 0 to 255, inclusive. Alternatively, a verbose name defined in /etc/iproute2/rt_realms may be given instead. SEE ALSO
tc(8), ip-route(8) iproute2 21 Oct 2015 Route classifier in tc(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy