Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Signatures
Contact Us Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators Signatures Post 302125239 by reborg on Wednesday 4th of July 2007 05:59:33 PM
Old 07-04-2007
Now that you say it vgersh99 I think you are right.
Maybe they became enabled during the upgrade and Neo has turned them off again, I don't know if this is the case.
 

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. HP-UX

List of Signatures

Hi Guys I just want the list of signatures and the event IDs(If there are any) of the HP-UX System log. If anybody having the same, could you please just post me or give the link where I could find them. Thanks Guys Praveen Kumar Pagadala (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: pgdl_praveen
0 Replies

2. UNIX and Linux Applications

Sendmail with Digital Signatures

I have been asked to look into implementing digital signatures with emails sent from our Solaris servers to users. The emails would be sent from "application" accounts on the servers to users in the Windows world (exchange). The only info I could find was a high level blurb (read by a CIO)... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: bluescreen
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Delete gpt signatures

Hi Can anyone tell me how to delete GPT signatures in linux/unix. Thanks Tannu (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tannu
3 Replies

4. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

Signatures

Hi is it possible to add signatures? I have found option in profile config to enable it but no option to set it for my account. I have found some discussion form 2007. https://www.unix.com/post-here-contact-site-administrators-moderators/39610-signatures.html Is it true signatures are... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: gito
8 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature

Hello, First, sorry for my english :mad: I just installed php / mysql on my RHEL4 server, when I want to list the installed package for mysql, I received a warning as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # rpm -qa | grep mysql ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gerrard08
1 Replies
MooseX::Method::Signatures(3pm) 			User Contributed Perl Documentation			   MooseX::Method::Signatures(3pm)

NAME
MooseX::Method::Signatures - Method declarations with type constraints and no source filter SYNOPSIS
package Foo; use Moose; use MooseX::Method::Signatures; method morning (Str $name) { $self->say("Good morning ${name}!"); } method hello (Str :$who, Int :$age where { $_ > 0 }) { $self->say("Hello ${who}, I am ${age} years old!"); } method greet (Str $name, Bool :$excited = 0) { if ($excited) { $self->say("GREETINGS ${name}!"); } else { $self->say("Hi ${name}!"); } } $foo->morning('Resi'); # This works. $foo->hello(who => 'world', age => 42); # This too. $foo->greet('Resi', excited => 1); # And this as well. $foo->hello(who => 'world', age => 'fortytwo'); # This doesn't. $foo->hello(who => 'world', age => -23); # This neither. $foo->morning; # Won't work. $foo->greet; # Will fail. DESCRIPTION
Provides a proper method keyword, like "sub" but specifically for making methods and validating their arguments against Moose type constraints. SIGNATURE SYNTAX
The signature syntax is heavily based on Perl 6. However not the full Perl 6 signature syntax is supported yet and some of it never will be. Type Constraints method foo ( $affe) # no type checking method bar (Animal $affe) # $affe->isa('Animal') method baz (Animal|Human $affe) # $affe->isa('Animal') || $affe->isa('Human') Positional vs. Named method foo ( $a, $b, $c) # positional method bar (:$a, :$b, :$c) # named method baz ( $a, $b, :$c) # combined Required vs. Optional method foo ($a , $b!, :$c!, :$d!) # required method bar ($a?, $b?, :$c , :$d?) # optional Defaults method foo ($a = 42) # defaults to 42 Constraints method foo ($foo where { $_ % 2 == 0 }) # only even Invocant method foo ( $moo) # invocant is called $self and is required method bar ($self: $moo) # same, but explicit method baz ($class: $moo) # invocant is called $class Labels method foo (: $affe ) # called as $obj->foo(affe => $value) method bar (:apan($affe)) # called as $obj->foo(apan => $value) Traits method foo (Affe $bar does trait) method foo (Affe $bar is trait) The only currently supported trait is "coerce", which will attempt to coerce the value provided if it doesn't satisfy the requirements of the type constraint. Placeholders method foo ($bar, $, $baz) Sometimes you don't care about some params you're being called with. Just put the bare sigil instead of a full variable name into the signature to avoid an extra lexical variable to be created. Complex Example method foo ( SomeClass $thing where { $_->can('stuff') }: Str $bar = "apan", Int :$baz! = 42 where { $_ % 2 == 0 } where { $_ > 10 } ) # the invocant is called $thing, must be an instance of SomeClass and has to implement a 'stuff' method # $bar is positional, required, must be a string and defaults to "apan" # $baz is named, required, must be an integer, defaults to 42 and needs # to be even and greater than 10 BUGS, CAVEATS AND NOTES This module is as stable now, but this is not to say that it is entirely bug free. If you notice any odd behaviour (messages not being as good as they could for example) then please raise a bug. Fancy signatures Parse::Method::Signatures is used to parse the signatures. However, some signatures that can be parsed by it aren't supported by this module (yet). No source filter While this module does rely on the hairy black magic of Devel::Declare it does not depend on a source filter. As such, it doesn't try to parse and rewrite your source code and there should be no weird side effects. Devel::Declare only effects compilation. After that, it's a normal subroutine. As such, for all that hairy magic, this module is surprisingly stable. What about regular subroutines? Devel::Declare cannot yet change the way "sub" behaves. However, the signatures module can. Right now it only provides very basic signatures, but it's extendable enough that plugging MooseX::Method::Signatures signatures into that should be quite possible. What about the return value? Type constraints for return values can be declared using method foo (Int $x, Str $y) returns (Bool) { ... } however, this feature only works with scalar return values and is still considered to be experimental. Interaction with Moose::Role Methods not seen by a role's "requires" Because the processing of the MooseX::Method::Signatures "method" and the Moose "with" keywords are both done at runtime, it can happen that a role will require a method before it is declared (which will cause Moose to complain very loudly and abort the program). For example, the following will not work: # in file Canine.pm package Canine; use Moose; use MooseX::Method::Signatures; with 'Watchdog'; method bark { print "Woof! "; } 1; # in file Watchdog.pm package Watchdog; use Moose::Role; requires 'bark'; # will assert! evaluated before 'method' is processed sub warn_intruder { my $self = shift; my $intruder = shift; $self->bark until $intruder->gone; } 1; A workaround for this problem is to use "with" only after the methods have been defined. To take our previous example, Canine could be reworked thus: package Canine; use Moose; use MooseX::Method::Signatures; method bark { print "Woof! "; } with 'Watchdog'; 1; A better solution is to use MooseX::Declare instead of plain MooseX::Method::Signatures. It defers application of roles until the end of the class definition. With it, our example would becomes: # in file Canine.pm use MooseX::Declare; class Canine with Watchdog { method bark { print "Woof! "; } } 1; # in file Watchdog.pm use MooseX::Declare; role Watchdog { requires 'bark'; method warn_intruder ( $intruder ) { $self->bark until $intruder->gone; } } 1; Subroutine redefined warnings When composing a Moose::Role into a class that uses MooseX::Method::Signatures, you may get a "Subroutine redefined" warning. This happens when both the role and the class define a method/subroutine of the same name. (The way roles work, the one defined in the class takes precedence.) To eliminate this warning, make sure that your "with" declaration happens after any method/subroutine declarations that may have the same name as a method/subroutine within a role. SEE ALSO
MooseX::Declare Method::Signatures::Simple Method::Signatures Perl6::Subs Devel::Declare Parse::Method::Signatures Moose AUTHORS
o Florian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org> o Ash Berlin <ash@cpan.org> o Cory Watson <gphat@cpan.org> o Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com> o Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org> o Hakim Cassimally <hakim.cassimally@gmail.com> o Jonathan Scott Duff <duff@pobox.com> o Justin Hunter <justin.d.hunter@gmail.com> o Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com> o Maik Hentsche <maik.hentsche@amd.com> o Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org> o Rhesa Rozendaal <rhesa@cpan.org> o Ricardo SIGNES <rjbs@cpan.org> o Steffen Schwigon <ss5@renormalist.net> o Yanick Champoux <yanick@babyl.dyndns.org> o Nicholas Perez <nperez@cpan.org> o Karen Etheridge <ether@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
This software is copyright (c) 2012 by Florian Ragwitz. This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself. perl v5.14.2 2012-05-21 MooseX::Method::Signatures(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy