Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Shared memory in shared library Post 302118849 by DreamWarrior on Thursday 24th of May 2007 01:42:59 PM
Old 05-24-2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by porter
You could have an additional process who's job it is to create and shutdown the shared memory. This process could have some form of IPC to so the other processes can attach and detach, when the last goes, the manager process can clean up and die.

You could have the manage process fork/exec'd by the client libraries when they start so it does not have to prestart, and have setuid bit to run with the appropriate rights other than the first user to start up.

If the clients connect to the manager process with a UNIX domain socket then the manager could use poll() on all connections to monitor that the processes are alive, if they exit uncleanly the socket connection will still die.
I was considering this approach, and it may work...but I thought to myself, why bother use shared memory if I'm going to have a socket connection. In which case, I may as well just relay the entire request to the manager process and let him decision it and not make the memory shared.

Hummm....

Another shared memory question:

Storing pointers in shared memory (of course to other areas of shared memory), can this be done? I think the answer lies in how you attach the shared memory to the process, no? Looking at the shmat call, the second parameter specifies the memory address. I assume this is the "base address" given to the process for the shared memory segment. I would guess that pointers will only be valid throughout all applications accessing the shared memory iff all applications specify this parameter similarly when attaching the segment. Is this correct?

If the above is correct, then I would guess that I may compete with other applications for the address I want to attach to (being a library and all) and that I may not easily be able to guarantee that I can get the address I want. To prevent this, it seems the OS allows one to pass NULL to this parameter and the OS will chose an available address to map to. In which case, I could not really store pointers in shared memory, rather I must store offsets and let the application compute the actual pointer value by adding its individual "base address." This is obviously performance draining....

So...how is that "obstacle" usally overcome?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Shared Library

hello all I want to work in shared libraries how can i work in Linux Environment ? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajashekaran
2 Replies

2. HP-UX

Shared Library Problem

I have this error when I try to do check on the oracle database... Can you help me figure out whats the problem? Thanks for all the help! /usr/lib/pa20_64/dld.sl: Unable to find library 'libjox8.sl'. /usr/lib/pa20_64/dld.sl: Unable to find library 'libjox8.sl'. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vinz
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Shared memory shortage but lots of unused memory

I am running HP-UX B.11.11. I'm increasing a parameter for a database engine so that it uses more memory to buffer the disk drive (to speed up performance). I have over 5GB of memory not being used. But when I try to start the DB with the increased buffer parameter I get told. "Not... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cjcamaro
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

shared library

What is the primary difference between static library and dynamic library? and how to write static shared library? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: areef4u
1 Replies

5. Programming

Shared memory for shared library

I am writing a shared library in Linux (but compatible with other UNIXes) and I want to allow multiple instances to share a piece of memory -- 1 byte is enough. What's the "best" way to do this? I want to optimize for speed and portability. Obviously, I'll have to worry about mutual exclusion. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: otheus
0 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to change a Makefile from building static library to shared library?

Hi: I have a library that it only offers Makefile for building static library. It built libxxx.a file. How do I in any way build a shared library? (either changin the Makefile or direct script or command to build shared library) Thanks. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cpthk
1 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Which sections of a shared library should be loaded in the physical memory?

Each shared library may contain sections with allocatable flag as below: ... .hash .gnu.hash .dynsym .dynstr .gnu.version .gnu.version_d .rel.dyn .rel.plt .plt ... My questions is that: among above sections, which of them should be loaded in the physical memory by run-time linker... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Dongping84
3 Replies

8. OS X (Apple)

Linking to a shared library

I'm trying to get Valgrind to work with an openmpi application in OS X. However I want to hardcode the path to a shared library called libmpiwrap-amd64-darwin.so into my application so that it is available at runtime. In Linux this is relatively simple, I would just add the option... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Valgrinder
0 Replies

9. Programming

Shared library with acces to shared memory.

Hello. I am new to this forum and I would like to ask for advice about low level POSIX programming. I have to implement a POSIX compliant C shared library. A file will have some variables and the shared library will have some functions which need those variables. There is one special... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: iamjag
5 Replies

10. AIX

Add shared members from library to same library in a different directory

I'm trying to install libiconv to AIX 7.1 from an rpm off of the perzl site. The rpm appears to install but I get this error message. add shr4.o shared members from /usr/lib/libiconv.a to /opt/freeware/lib/libiconv.a add shr.o shared members from /usr/lib/libiconv.a to ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: kneemoe
5 Replies
SHMOP_OPEN(3)								 1							     SHMOP_OPEN(3)

shmop_open - Create or open shared memory block

SYNOPSIS
int shmop_open (int $key, string $flags, int $mode, int $size) DESCRIPTION
shmop_open(3) can create or open a shared memory block. PARAMETERS
o $key - System's id for the shared memory block. Can be passed as a decimal or hex. o $flags - The flags that you can use: o "a" for access (sets SHM_RDONLY for shmat) use this flag when you need to open an existing shared memory segment for read only o "c" for create (sets IPC_CREATE) use this flag when you need to create a new shared memory segment or if a segment with the same key exists, try to open it for read and write o "w" for read & write access use this flag when you need to read and write to a shared memory segment, use this flag in most cases. o "n" create a new memory segment (sets IPC_CREATE|IPC_EXCL) use this flag when you want to create a new shared memory seg- ment but if one already exists with the same flag, fail. This is useful for security purposes, using this you can prevent race condition exploits. o $mode - The permissions that you wish to assign to your memory segment, those are the same as permission for a file. Permissions need to be passed in octal form, like for example 0644 o $size - The size of the shared memory block you wish to create in bytes Note Note: the 3rd and 4th should be entered as 0 if you are opening an existing memory segment. RETURN VALUES
On success shmop_open(3) will return an id that you can use to access the shared memory segment you've created. FALSE is returned on failure. EXAMPLES
Example #1 Create a new shared memory block <?php $shm_key = ftok(__FILE__, 't'); $shm_id = shmop_open($shm_key, "c", 0644, 100); ?> This example opened a shared memory block with a system id returned by ftok(3). SEE ALSO
shmop_close(3), shmop_delete(3). PHP Documentation Group SHMOP_OPEN(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy