Sponsored Content
Special Forums Hardware Filesystems, Disks and Memory Bad Super Block: Magic Number Wrong Post 302116440 by Bynds on Friday 4th of May 2007 12:22:44 AM
Old 05-04-2007
Solution to problem

Hello to all that find this thread through Google :-)

I had a similar problem with my HDD and FreeBSD saying there was a bad superblock.
I followed the first step of the procedure and discovered (to my relief) the backup superblocks.

Once past this point the next reccomendation was to use fsck -b 160 /dev/"my partition"
This doesn't work as FreeBSD's fsck command doesn't acknowledge the -b flag as valid.

The trick is to use fsck_ffs which *does* recognise the -b flag and takes the appropriate action. i.e. fsck_ffs -b 160 /dev/"my partition"

Second tip (don't flame me for it's obviousness, not everyone is a super sysop). Make sure you are have root access otherwise no errors will be corrected.

Third Tip. If it looks like your filesystem is in a really bad way, look at the -y flag in the man page. i.e. read man fsck_ffs looking for -y :-)

I hope this is usefull for anyone else that has the problem.

Cheers,
Neil S Davenport
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Bad magic number in super-block

I am running mandrake 8.2 and when booting I get the message: e2fschk: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/hda8. The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and really contains a valid an ext2 filesystem (and... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Jay
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

bad magic number

Hi, when installing a piece of third part software I get the error "Bad magic number" at one point when it tries to use libraries from the bea tuxedo server. Am I correct that this means that the software is expecting 32bit while I'm on 64bit? Is there a way around it or can it only be solved... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rein
5 Replies

3. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Bad Magic Number

Dear All, i have a SCSI hard disk drive i'm installing on it solaris 5 and the workstation is sun sparc, i made an image of this H.D using Norton Ghost 6, so i took off the SCSI H.D from the sun workstation and put it on a Compaq server then i booted the server from the Norton Ghost floppy disk... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wesweshahaha
0 Replies

4. HP-UX

BAD SUPER BLOCK - Run fsck with alternate super block number

Error received when I tried to restore a blank disk with an 'auto recovery' DDS tape via HP-UX recovery system 2.0 onto a 1Gb SCSI. I assumed it would do the setup, wrong. Could someone tell me the procedure to initial disk for recovering files using cpio. The system is a HP-UX 9.04 version on a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: admin wanabee
1 Replies

5. Solaris

solaris error BAD SUPER BLOCK

I want mount a disk. I have this error. I'm trying to correct with the superblock but i have the same error. Look my procedure. bash-2.03# fsck -F ufs /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0 Alternate super block location: 9423392. ** /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0 BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG USE AN ALTERNATE... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: simquest
1 Replies

6. Solaris

wrong magic number

/pci@if,0/pci@1,1/ide@3/dad@0,0 corrupt label wrong magic number can u plz suggustion me (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: tirupathi
6 Replies

7. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Bad super block: Magic number wrong

Whenever i run, # fsck -F ufs /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 The following error prompt out:- ** /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG USE AN ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY NEEDED INFORMATION; eg. fsck -o b=# where # is the alternate super block. SEE fsck_ufs(1M). ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: beginningDBA
3 Replies

8. Solaris

Solaris 8.2 Bad magic number

I'll keep it fairly straight forward. I work with a Solaris server and magically today it decided to take a dump on me. At first it give a long list of files that couldn't be acessed before terminating the boot process and returning to the 'ok' prompt. Booting in single-user mode allowed me to run... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Aon
4 Replies

9. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Can't repair super block, bad magic number

Hello all, I have a hard drive that I can't repair. The drive is WD15EARS - Filesystem ext4 ( not 100% sure ) It's used in a Synology DS110j NAS. I try to run fsck -p /dev/sdb on the HD and I get this: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: The superblock... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dallasw1983
4 Replies

10. Solaris

Bad magic number error

So we have a new to us v240 server with no OS installed. It has an outdated version of OB and ALOM so before we install the OS we want to update both. We have a DVD with the latest OB patch burned on it. We do the boot cdrom command but receive the Bad Magic Number Error. Does an OS need to... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dunkpancakes
2 Replies
FSCK(8) 						       System Administration							   FSCK(8)

NAME
fsck.minix - check consistency of Minix filesystem SYNOPSIS
fsck.minix [-larvsmf] device DESCRIPTION
fsck.minix performs a consistency check for the Linux MINIX filesystem. The current version supports the 14 character and 30 character filename options. The program assumes the filesystem is quiescent. fsck.minix should not be used on a mounted device unless you can be sure nobody is writ- ing to it (and remember that the kernel can write to it when it searches for files). The device name will usually have the following form: /dev/hda[1-63] (IDE disk 1) /dev/hdb[1-63] (IDE disk 2) /dev/sda[1-15] (SCSI disk 1) /dev/sdb[1-15] (SCSI disk 2) If the filesystem was changed (i.e., repaired), then fsck.minix will print "FILE SYSTEM HAS CHANGED" and will sync(2) three times before exiting. Since Linux does not currently have raw devices, there is no need to reboot at this time. WARNING
fsck.minix should not be used on a mounted filesystem. Using fsck.minix on a mounted filesystem is very dangerous, due to the possibility that deleted files are still in use, and can seriously damage a perfectly good filesystem! If you absolutely have to run fsck.minix on a mounted filesystem (i.e., the root filesystem), make sure nothing is writing to the disk, and that no files are "zombies" waiting for dele- tion. OPTIONS
-l List all filenames. -r Perform interactive repairs. -a Perform automatic repairs. (This option implies -r and serves to answer all of the questions asked with the default.) Note that this can be extremely dangerous in the case of extensive filesystem damage. -v Be verbose. -s Output super-block information. -m Activate MINIX-like "mode not cleared" warnings. -f Force a filesystem check even if the filesystem was marked as valid (this marking is done by the kernel when the filesystem is unmounted). SEE ALSO
fsck(8), fsck.ext(8), fsck.ext2(8), fsck.xiafs(8), mkfs(8), mkfs.minix(8), mkfs.ext(8), mkfs.ext2(8), mkfs.xiafs(8), reboot(8) DIAGNOSTICS
There are numerous diagnostic messages. The ones mentioned here are the most commonly seen in normal usage. If the device does not exist, fsck.minix will print "unable to read super block". If the device exists, but is not a MINIX filesystem, fsck.minix will print "bad magic number in super-block". EXIT CODES
The exit code returned by fsck.minix is the sum of the following: 0 No errors 3 Filesystem errors corrected, system should be rebooted if filesystem was mounted 4 Filesystem errors left uncorrected 8 Operational error 16 Usage or syntax error In point of fact, only 0, 3, 4, 7, 8, and 16 can ever be returned. AUTHOR
Linus Torvalds (torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi) Error code values by Rik Faith (faith@cs.unc.edu) Added support for filesystem valid flag: Dr. Wettstein (greg%wind.uucp@plains.nodak.edu) Check to prevent fsck of mounted filesystem added by Daniel Quinlan (quinlan@yggdrasil.com) Minix v2 fs support by Andreas Schwab (schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de), updated by Nicolai Langfeldt (janl@math.uio.no) Portability patch by Russell King (rmk@ecs.soton.ac.uk). AVAILABILITY
The fsck.minix command is part of the util-linux package and is available from ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/. util-linux July 1996 FSCK(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy