Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: semaphores using up and down
Top Forums Programming semaphores using up and down Post 302113117 by ddx08 on Tuesday 3rd of April 2007 02:13:04 PM
Old 04-03-2007
what i did was just define a number of KEYs equal to the number of semaphores i wanted and then i created 2 struct to create the functions up and down. i didn't use a void main, just main. Why would void main be bad?


you have to release the resources??? how do you do that? aren't they released as soon as the program is done?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Semaphores

Dear Reader, I'm in a multiprocess environment working with shared mem and semaphores as mutex.. The problem is -- If one of the process hooked up with the semaphore and accessing the shared mem, terminates abruptly ( or got killed ), other process which are in want of the semaphore are... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joseph_shibu
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Semaphores

Hi all, I am using HP 10.20 on A 9000/785. My question is: If I am the only person logged in as root at the moment, how many "semaphore proccesses" should I have?? Is it only one, or it is relevant to other system proccesses? Here is what I get listing the current semaphores # ipcs -sp... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: guest100
1 Replies

3. Programming

semaphores

Hi there, Could someone please confirm which POSIX semaphore routines should be used for a multiprocess (and not multithreaded) environment? sys/sem.h definitely works. but the routines, semget, semctl, semop are pretty unwieldy. So, I am looking for an easier way out. From the man pages... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: qntmteleporter
2 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

semaphores

Hi Friends, If i execute this command it comes back with 300 lines: ipcs|grep cerebrus >>> i would like to clear the semaphores but ipcrm can remove one id at a time. is there a quicker way of removing semaphores maybe using awk? Regards, (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kekanap
1 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

How many semaphores?

Hello, first of all I apologize if this thread is not in the correct section of this forum, but this one just seemed the most appropriate. The question I have does not concern Unix specifically, it applies to virtually any OS, however it is in Unix where I learned about this problem. So, the... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Watto86
8 Replies

6. Programming

Semaphores Urgent

Hello, Iam trying to implement the sleeping barber problem using semaphores and running on UNIX machine. Iam linking it to the thread libraries : bash-2.03$ g++ sleepingBarber.cpp -lpthread -o sleeping but when i execute it i get the following error: bash-2.03$ sleeping Starting Program... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mohit.choudhary
4 Replies

7. Programming

Problem with semaphores

Hello, I was doing an exercise of semaphores and shared memory, namely the barbers: -B number of barbers -S number of chairs -C number of customers. I have done already and I compiled the code, but when run I get an error segment. Can not be and it took several days. If anyone sees the error... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ciudadwifi
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

semaphores

I am having problem with semaphores. I am trying to protect line where process prints so that every process with print in proper order.This is the code.. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/ipc.h> #include <sys/sem.h> #include <sys/types.h> union... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: joker40
3 Replies

9. Programming

about Semaphores

Hello Everybody, I am building a server. this server contains some data. Clients may modify this data or read this data. If a client is reading the data and at the same time another client is modifying the data then at this case the reading client may read some false data (some old mixed with... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Omar_Mokhtar
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Semaphores

Hi, Can somebody please explain me what semaphores are? there purpose? and there effects? Thanks in advance:) (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Laxxi
0 Replies
PTHREAD_EXIT(3) 					     Linux Programmer's Manual						   PTHREAD_EXIT(3)

NAME
pthread_exit - terminate calling thread SYNOPSIS
#include <pthread.h> void pthread_exit(void *retval); Compile and link with -pthread. DESCRIPTION
The pthread_exit() function terminates the calling thread and returns a value via retval that (if the thread is joinable) is available to another thread in the same process that calls pthread_join(3). Any clean-up handlers established by pthread_cleanup_push(3) that have not yet been popped, are popped (in the reverse of the order in which they were pushed) and executed. If the thread has any thread-specific data, then, after the clean-up handlers have been executed, the corresponding destructor functions are called, in an unspecified order. When a thread terminates, process-shared resources (e.g., mutexes, condition variables, semaphores, and file descriptors) are not released, and functions registered using atexit(3) are not called. After the last thread in a process terminates, the process terminates as by calling exit(3) with an exit status of zero; thus, process- shared resources are released and functions registered using atexit(3) are called. RETURN VALUE
This function does not return to the caller. ERRORS
This function always succeeds. ATTRIBUTES
For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see attributes(7). +---------------+---------------+---------+ |Interface | Attribute | Value | +---------------+---------------+---------+ |pthread_exit() | Thread safety | MT-Safe | +---------------+---------------+---------+ CONFORMING TO
POSIX.1-2001, POSIX.1-2008. NOTES
Performing a return from the start function of any thread other than the main thread results in an implicit call to pthread_exit(), using the function's return value as the thread's exit status. To allow other threads to continue execution, the main thread should terminate by calling pthread_exit() rather than exit(3). The value pointed to by retval should not be located on the calling thread's stack, since the contents of that stack are undefined after the thread terminates. BUGS
Currently, there are limitations in the kernel implementation logic for wait(2)ing on a stopped thread group with a dead thread group leader. This can manifest in problems such as a locked terminal if a stop signal is sent to a foreground process whose thread group leader has already called pthread_exit(). SEE ALSO
pthread_create(3), pthread_join(3), pthreads(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2017-09-15 PTHREAD_EXIT(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy