Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: semaphores using up and down
Top Forums Programming semaphores using up and down Post 302113088 by jim mcnamara on Tuesday 3rd of April 2007 10:08:43 AM
Old 04-03-2007
Up and down? Do you mean a mutex?

Sempahores can have values other than one and zero. Mutexes are "switches" - either on or off (one or zero).
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Semaphores

Dear Reader, I'm in a multiprocess environment working with shared mem and semaphores as mutex.. The problem is -- If one of the process hooked up with the semaphore and accessing the shared mem, terminates abruptly ( or got killed ), other process which are in want of the semaphore are... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joseph_shibu
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Semaphores

Hi all, I am using HP 10.20 on A 9000/785. My question is: If I am the only person logged in as root at the moment, how many "semaphore proccesses" should I have?? Is it only one, or it is relevant to other system proccesses? Here is what I get listing the current semaphores # ipcs -sp... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: guest100
1 Replies

3. Programming

semaphores

Hi there, Could someone please confirm which POSIX semaphore routines should be used for a multiprocess (and not multithreaded) environment? sys/sem.h definitely works. but the routines, semget, semctl, semop are pretty unwieldy. So, I am looking for an easier way out. From the man pages... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: qntmteleporter
2 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

semaphores

Hi Friends, If i execute this command it comes back with 300 lines: ipcs|grep cerebrus >>> i would like to clear the semaphores but ipcrm can remove one id at a time. is there a quicker way of removing semaphores maybe using awk? Regards, (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kekanap
1 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

How many semaphores?

Hello, first of all I apologize if this thread is not in the correct section of this forum, but this one just seemed the most appropriate. The question I have does not concern Unix specifically, it applies to virtually any OS, however it is in Unix where I learned about this problem. So, the... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Watto86
8 Replies

6. Programming

Semaphores Urgent

Hello, Iam trying to implement the sleeping barber problem using semaphores and running on UNIX machine. Iam linking it to the thread libraries : bash-2.03$ g++ sleepingBarber.cpp -lpthread -o sleeping but when i execute it i get the following error: bash-2.03$ sleeping Starting Program... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mohit.choudhary
4 Replies

7. Programming

Problem with semaphores

Hello, I was doing an exercise of semaphores and shared memory, namely the barbers: -B number of barbers -S number of chairs -C number of customers. I have done already and I compiled the code, but when run I get an error segment. Can not be and it took several days. If anyone sees the error... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ciudadwifi
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

semaphores

I am having problem with semaphores. I am trying to protect line where process prints so that every process with print in proper order.This is the code.. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/ipc.h> #include <sys/sem.h> #include <sys/types.h> union... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: joker40
3 Replies

9. Programming

about Semaphores

Hello Everybody, I am building a server. this server contains some data. Clients may modify this data or read this data. If a client is reading the data and at the same time another client is modifying the data then at this case the reading client may read some false data (some old mixed with... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Omar_Mokhtar
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Semaphores

Hi, Can somebody please explain me what semaphores are? there purpose? and there effects? Thanks in advance:) (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Laxxi
0 Replies
mutex(5)						Standards, Environments, and Macros						  mutex(5)

NAME
mutex - concepts relating to mutual exclusion locks DESCRIPTION
Mutual exclusion locks (mutexes) prevent multiple threads from simultaneously executing critical sections of code which access shared data (that is, mutexes are used to serialize the execution of threads). All mutexes must be global. A successful call to acquire a mutex will cause another thread that is also trying to lock the same mutex to block until the owner thread unlocks the mutex. Mutexes can synchronize threads within the same process or in other processes. Mutexes can be used to synchronize threads between processes if the mutexes are allocated in writable memory and shared among the cooperating processes (see mmap(2)), and have been initialized for this task. The following table lists mutex functions and the actions they perform. +-----------------------+-----------------------------------+ | FUNCTION | ACTION | |mutex_init | Initialize a mutex. | |mutex_destroy | Destroy a mutex. | |mutex_lock | Lock a mutex. | |mutex_trylock | Attempt to lock a mutex. | |mutex_unlock | Unlock a mutex. | |pthread_mutex_init | Initialize a mutex. | |pthread_mutex_destroy | Destroy a mutex. | |pthread_mutex_lock | Lock a mutex. | |pthread_mutex_trylock | Attempt to lock a mutex. | |pthread_mutex_unlock | Unlock a mutex. | +-----------------------+-----------------------------------+ Initialization Mutexes are either intra-process or inter-process, depending upon the argument passed implicitly or explicitly to the initialization of that mutex. A statically allocated mutex does not need to be explicitly initialized; by default, a statically allocated mutex is initial- ized with all zeros and its scope is set to be within the calling process. For inter-process synchronization, a mutex needs to be allocated in memory shared between these processes. Since the memory for such a mutex must be allocated dynamically, the mutex needs to be explicitly initialized with the appropriate attribute that indicates inter- process use. Locking and Unlocking A critical section of code is enclosed by a call to lock the mutex and the call to unlock the mutex to protect it from simultaneous access by multiple threads. Only one thread at a time may possess mutually exclusive access to the critical section of code that is enclosed by the mutex-locking call and the mutex-unlocking call, whether the mutex's scope is intra-process or inter-process. A thread calling to lock the mutex either gets exclusive access to the code starting from the successful locking until its call to unlock the mutex, or it waits until the mutex is unlocked by the thread that locked it. Mutexes have ownership, unlike semaphores. Only the thread that locked a mutex, (that is, the owner of the mutex), should unlock it. If a thread waiting for a mutex receives a signal, upon return from the signal handler, the thread resumes waiting for the mutex as if there was no interrupt. Caveats Mutexes are almost like data - they can be embedded in data structures, files, dynamic or static memory, and so forth. Hence, they are easy to introduce into a program. However, too many mutexes can degrade performance and scalability of the application. Because too few mutexes can hinder the concurrency of the application, they should be introduced with care. Also, incorrect usage (such as recursive calls, or violation of locking order, and so forth) can lead to deadlocks, or worse, data inconsistencies. ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |MT-Level |MT-Safe | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ SEE ALSO
mmap(2), shmop(2), mutex_destroy(3C), mutex_init(3C), mutex_lock(3C), mutex_trylock(3C), mutex_unlock(3C), pthread_create(3C), pthread_mutex_destroy(3C), pthread_mutex_init(3C), pthread_mutex_lock(3C), pthread_mutex_trylock(3C), pthread_mutex_unlock(3C), pthread_mutexattr_init(3C), attributes(5), standards(5) NOTES
In the current implementation of threads, pthread_mutex_lock(), pthread_mutex_unlock(), mutex_lock() mutex_unlock(), pthread_mutex_try- lock(), and mutex_trylock() do not validate the mutex type. Therefore, an uninitialized mutex or a mutex with an invalid type does not return EINVAL. Interfaces for mutexes with an invalid type have unspecified behavior. By default, if multiple threads are waiting for a mutex, the order of acquisition is undefined. USYNC_THREAD does not support multiple mappings to the same logical synch object. If you need to mmap() a synch object to different loca- tions within the same address space, then the synch object should be initialized as a shared object USYNC_PROCESS for Solaris, and PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE for POSIX. SunOS 5.10 20 Jul 1998 mutex(5)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy