Login or Register to Ask a Question and Join Our Community

Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Installing unix.
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Installing unix. Post 302103913 by BOFH on Monday 22nd of January 2007 09:57:55 AM
Old 01-22-2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike55
Ok

I have just been told by someone that it is not possible to get a version of UNIX that is suitable for desktops & laptops. And that I should instead focus on setting up UNIX. Furthermore, it was also mentioned to me that UNIX is not Free, or not Open Source while LINUX is.

I would appreciate it if someone could either confirm or deny this information.

Mike55.
Well Sun has been releasing its software as free and there are several open solaris projects including gnu/solaris (http://www.gnusolaris.org) which runs on top of the opensolaris kernel (http://www.opensolaris.org).

Certainly the source code to Solaris is "open". It's all there for you to see and peruse. I'd have to check out the license though to see what the license allows.

But I'm just defending Solaris since it's my main focus. Personally I'd use Linux for a full on desktop environment due to the many available applications. I do use my Solaris box as a desktop but mainly as a portal for working on other servers. I have a web browser running on it for data lookups.

And as to your other message, Linux doesn't stand for anything in particular. It's a merging of Linus' name and Unix based off of Minix which was a teaching kernel and not free. GNU however stands for "GNU's not Unix". Maybe that's where your non-unix person got mixed up Smilie

I only mention Linux because it's easier to get information on it and it's more likely to work on your hardware. The commands are the same as Solaris (and AIX/Irix/HP-UX/...) for the most part and in many cases, the GNU commands have many more features. Solaris was created to work on Sun hardware, just as AIX works best on IBM hardware, Irix on SGI's and HP-UX on HP hardware. For x86 hardware, I'd go with Linux or some form of BSD (like FreeBSD, which OS X is based off of).

Carl
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

installing Unix

Hi all, I just joined this forum and I have tons and tons of questions! Lets start with first one, how to install unix (on laptop)? I bought this book (Unix System Administrator's Bible) and got a CD (Full distribution copy of FreeBSD 2.2.5); and it is all compressed (I got that... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: nchauhan
4 Replies

2. HP-UX

[THANKS!] Help for installing PATROL for UNIX

:( I am installing PATROL for UNIX for my HP-UX. However after I run "/cdrom/setup.sh -serveronly", it brame me error, can anyone please me for this, thank you: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Launching WEB server. Please wait...... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: gghost
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

installing Orcale 8i on unix

Dear Sir, I am working in a bank and our parent bank has developed an application package which will work with oracle 8i on unix platform. The unix on the server is unix ware 7.1.1 with pro*c compiler. My question is 1. Whether Oracle 8i or above for windows will work on any unix version... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Parameswaran.AR
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

installing unix programs

hi everyone, I'm new to the forums. I am in the process of learning unix. I have a problem installing a unix program. The program at question is Links. It is an internet browser. I have the INSTALL notes, but I'm not having much luck at all. Any ideas on how to install? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: fissm
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

installing unix

hey, i downloaded a version of unix just recently in three files about a gig a piece in size. the website told me to merge the three files into one iso file...i did that using the xtra wizard on alchohol 120%. i tried to boot it from the virtual drive, but all it does is open a window that shows... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: retrop_ffilc
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Installing UNIX with no cd or floppy

I have an complicated problem to solve. I want to install a basic UNIX installation on a Compaq LTE 5280 (Win 95). The floppy drive does not work, and there is no cd-rom. It has a 14.4 modem, and I have dial-up internet. I also have another computer (Win 98) with a floppy drive, cd drive, and... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: aeromark98
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Installing Unix

Hello, I am a compete beginner to Unix, I have a very old HP 9000 class D server and i am trying to install HP-UX 11i on it, when i insert the cd into the cd drive on the Server and boot it up it does not automatically boot into the install of Unix. I have tried letting the Server boot... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: eoghanlee
1 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Need help Installing UNIX

I have a dual boot - XP and Solaris 10 on my Intel Box. Since quite sometime now, I have been trying to get a driver for the Network card on my box so that I can connect to the Web through Solaris; but Solaris does not have a generic driver for my Gigabit Ethernet 10.100.1000 T-base card. As a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tubbyrana
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Installing Unix

I am new to Unix. I want to be able to do shell scripting. I have installed Vmware Server on my PC. Please see my PC specs below: Processor: Intel Core Duo CPU @ 2.2 GHz Memory: 2GB System Type: 32-bit OS How can I use Unix-Linux on my PC and learn Unix? (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: abou202
9 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Installing programs in Unix

I have installed a software called GMT, then writing a script that call the new programs ./example02.sh but I am getting ./example02.sh: line 20: gmtset: command not found I have done ./configure make make install (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kristinu
1 Replies

LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN

sys::hostname::long

Sys::Hostname::Long(3pm)				User Contributed Perl Documentation				  Sys::Hostname::Long(3pm)

NAME

       Sys::Hostname::Long - Try every conceivable way to get full hostname

SYNOPSIS

	   use Sys::Hostname::Long;
	   $host_long = hostname_long;

DESCRIPTION

       How to get the host full name in perl on multiple operating systems (mac, windows, unix* etc)

DISCUSSION

       This is the SECOND release of this code. It has an improved set of tests and improved interfaces - but it is still often failing to get a
       full host name.	This of course is the reason I wrote the module, it is difficult to get full host names accurately on each system. On some
       systems (eg: Linux) it is dependent on the order of the entries in /etc/hosts.

       To make it easier to test I have testall.pl to generate an output list of all methods. Thus even if the logic is incorrect, it may be pos-
       sible to get the full name.

       Attempt via many methods to get the systems full name. The Sys::Hostname class is the best and standard way to get the system hostname.
       However it is missing the long hostname.

       Special thanks to David Sundstrom and Greg Bacon for the original Sys::Hostname

SUPPORT

       This is the original list of platforms tested.

	       MacOS	       Macintosh Classic	       OK
	       Win32	       MS Windows (95,98,nt,2000...)
			       98			       OK
	       MacOS X	       Macintosh 10		       OK
			       (other darwin)		       Probably OK (not tested)
	       Linux	       Linux UNIX OS		       OK
			       Sparc			       OK
	       HPUX	       H.P. Unix 10?		       Not Tested
	       Solaris	       SUN Solaris 7?		       OK (now)
	       Irix	       SGI Irix 5?		       Not Tested
	       FreeBSD	       FreeBSD			       OK

       A new list has now been compiled of all the operating systems so that I can individually keep informaiton on their success.

       THIS IS IN NEED OF AN UPDATE AFTER NEXT RELEASE.

       Acorn - Not yet tested
       AIX - Not yet tested
       Amiga - Not yet tested
       Atari - Not yet tested
       AtheOS - Not yet tested
       BeOS - Not yet tested
       BSD - Not yet tested
       BSD/OS - Not yet tested
       Compaq - Not yet tested
       Cygwin - Not yet tested
       Concurrent - Not yet tested
       DG/UX - Not yet tested
       Digital - Not yet tested
       DEC OSF/1 - Not yet tested
       Digital UNIX - Not yet tested
       DYNIX/ptx - Not yet tested
       EPOC - Not yet tested
       FreeBSD - Not yet tested
       Fujitsu-Siemens - Not yet tested
       Guardian - Not yet tested
       HP - Not yet tested
       HP-UX - Not yet tested
       IBM - Not yet tested
       IRIX - Not yet tested - 3rd hand information might be ok.
       Japanese - Not yet tested
       JPerl - Not yet tested
       Linux
	   Debian - Not yet tested
	   Gentoo - Not yet tested
	   Mandrake - Not yet tested
	   Red Hat- Not yet tested
	   Slackware - Not yet tested
	   SuSe - Not yet tested
	   Yellowdog - Not yet tested
       LynxOS - Not yet tested
       Mac OS - Not yet tested
       Mac OS X - OK 20040315 (v1.1)
       MachTen - Not yet tested
       Minix - Not yet tested
       MinGW - Not yet tested
       MiNT - Not yet tested
       MPE/iX - Not yet tested
       MS-DOS - Not yet tested
       MVS - Not yet tested
       NetBSD - Not yet tested
       NetWare - Not yet tested
       NEWS-OS - Not yet tested
       NextStep - Not yet tested
       Novell - Not yet tested
       NonStop - Not yet tested
       NonStop-UX - Not yet tested
       OpenBSD - Not yet tested
       ODT - Not yet tested
       OpenVMS - Not yet tested
       Open UNIX - Not yet tested
       OS/2 - Not yet tested
       OS/390 - Not yet tested
       OS/400 - Not yet tested
       OSF/1 - Not yet tested
       OSR - Not yet tested
       Plan 9 - Not yet tested
       Pocket PC - Not yet tested
       PowerMAX - Not yet tested
       Psion - Not yet tested
       QNX
	   4 - Not yet tested
	   6 (Neutrino) - Not yet tested
       Reliant UNIX - Not yet tested
       RISCOS - Not yet tested
       SCO - Not yet tested
       SGI - Not yet tested
       Symbian - Not yet tested
       Sequent - Not yet tested
       Siemens - Not yet tested
       SINIX - Not yet tested
       Solaris - Not yet tested
       SONY - Not yet tested
       Sun - Not yet tested
       Stratus - Not yet tested
       Tandem - Not yet tested
       Tru64 - Not yet tested
       Ultrix - Not yet tested
       UNIX - Not yet tested
       U/WIN - Not yet tested
       Unixware - Not yet tested
       VMS - Not yet tested
       VOS - Not yet tested
       Windows
	   CE - Not yet tested
	   3.1 - Not yet tested
	   95 - Not yet tested
	   98 - Not yet tested
	   Me - Not yet tested
	   NT - Not yet tested
	   2000 - Not yet tested
	   XP - Not yet tested
       z/OS - Not yet tested

KNOWN LIMITATIONS

       Unix

       Most unix systems have trouble working out the fully quallified domain name as it to be configured somewhere in the system correctly. For
       example in most linux systems (debian, ?) the fully qualified name should be the first entry next to the ip number in /etc/hosts

	       192.168.0.1     fred.somwhere.special   fred

       If it is the other way around, it will fail.

       Mac

TODO

       Contributions

	       David Dick
	       Graeme Hart
	       Piotr Klaban

	       * Extra code from G
	       * Dispatch table
	       * List of all operating systems.

       Solaris	    * Fall back 2 - TCP with DNS works ok      * Also can read /etc/defaultdomain file

SEE ALSO

	       L<Sys::Hostname>

AUTHOR

       Scott Penrose <scottp@dd.com.au>

COPYRIGHT

       Copyright (c) 2001,2004,2005 Scott Penrose. All rights reserved.  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
       under the same terms as Perl itself.

perl v5.8.8							    2008-03-12						  Sys::Hostname::Long(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy