Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Operating system details
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Operating system details Post 302099695 by kapilraj on Wednesday 13th of December 2006 11:21:19 AM
Old 12-13-2006
Do you mean to say what I mentioned will not work ?

Regds,

Kaps
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Operating System

Which is much more powerful as an operating system: 1. Windows 2000 2. Windows 98 3. Windows XP 4. Windows ME 5. Unix 6. Linux and why is it much more powerful than the other operating systems that i have mentioned. thanks for your info... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: alecks1975
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Unix Operating System?

Hey all, I currently use FreeBSD and linux and have decided I want to use a proper Unix distrobution. Which Unix distro would you members recommend. The only requirments that I have is that I can use some pogramming utilities available. I don't mind the install process. One more thing, I know some... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: -zorin
2 Replies

3. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Fabric Operating System

Would any of your gentlemen have come across a decent reference for the FOS in your wanderings? Brocade just seems to want to sell me classes and FAN books :/ (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Eronysis
0 Replies

4. IP Networking

Operating System Programming

I am new in Kernel programming....i want to know how kernel is implemented.To this i have downloaded minix 3 kernel but i do not know where to start my study of kernel programming...please tell me from where to start understanding the code and how to run kernel in windows 7 or red hat. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sajan Gupta
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Best Operating System

Hello All, I want to install Linux on my machine, so please tell me one thing which is the best to install- 1.)Red Hat 2.)Cent OS 3.)Red Hat 4.)Ubuntu 5.)Fedora except that if there is any please tell me. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: parthmittal2007
1 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Detect Operating System

Hi, I need a script that needs to detect the Operating System and based upon wheter it is Linux, Solaris x86, Sparc, Itanium etc it should populate "ps" command with detailed output accordingly for example: ps -xef | grep java -> Itaniumps -auxwww | greap java -> Solaris (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: mohtashims
9 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

What's my Operating System

Can we know the operating given the IP address or DNS of the host. All I have is file://myserver/myapp (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mohtashims
4 Replies

8. Android

Android (operating system)

From Wikipedia (FYI): (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies
Sub::WrapPackages(3pm)					User Contributed Perl Documentation				    Sub::WrapPackages(3pm)

NAME
Sub::WrapPackages - add pre- and post-execution wrappers around all the subroutines in packages or around individual subs SYNOPSIS
use Sub::WrapPackages packages => [qw(Foo Bar Baz::*)], # wrap all subs in Foo and Bar # and any Baz::* packages subs => [qw(Barf::a, Barf::b)], # wrap these two subs as well wrap_inherited => 1, # and wrap any methods # inherited by Foo, Bar, or # Baz::* pre => sub { print "called $_[0] with params ". join(', ', @_[1..$#_])." "; }, post => sub { print "$_[0] returned $_[1] "; }; COMPATIBILITY
While this module does broadly the same job as the 1.x versions did, the interface may have changed incompatibly. Sorry. Hopefully it'll be more maintainable and slightly less crazily magical. Also, caller() should now work properly, ignoring wrappings. DESCRIPTION
This module installs pre- and post- execution subroutines for the subroutines or packages you specify. The pre-execution subroutine is passed the wrapped subroutine's name and all its arguments. The post-execution subroutine is passed the wrapped sub's name and its results. The return values from the pre- and post- subs are ignored, and they are called in the same context (void, scalar or list) as the calling code asked for. Normal usage is to pass a bunch of parameters when the module is used. However, you can also call Sub::WrapPackages::wrapsubs with the same parameters. PARAMETERS
Either pass parameters on loading the module, as above, or pass them to ... the wrapsubs subroutine the subs arrayref In the synopsis above, you will see two named parameters, "subs" and "packages". Any subroutine mentioned in "subs" will be wrapped. Any subroutines mentioned in 'subs' must already exist - ie their modules must be loaded - at the time you try to wrap them. the packages arrayref Any package mentioned here will have all its subroutines wrapped, including any that it imports at load-time. Packages can be loaded in any order - they don't have to already be loaded for Sub::WrapPackages to work its magic. You can specify wildcard packages. Anything ending in ::* is assumed to be such. For example, if you specify Orchard::Tree::*, then that matches Orchard::Tree, Orchard::Tree::Pear, Orchard::Apple::KingstonBlack etc, but not - of course - Pine::Tree or My::Orchard::Tree. Note, however, that if a module exports a subroutine at load-time using "import" then that sub will be wrapped in the exporting module but not in the importing module. This is because import() runs before we get a chance to fiddle with things. Sorry. Deferred wrapping of subs in packages that aren't yet loaded works via a subroutine inserted in @INC. This means that if you mess around with @INC, eg by inserting a directoy at the beginning of the path, the magic might not get a chance to run. If you "use lib" to mess with @INC though, it should work, as I've over-ridden lib's import() method. That said, code this funky has no right to work. Use with caution! wrap_inherited In conjunction with the "packages" arrayref, this wraps all calls to inherited methods made through those packages. If you call those methods directly in the superclass then they are not affected - unless they're wrapped in the superclass of course. pre and post References to the subroutines you want to use as wrappers. BUGS
AUTOLOAD and DESTROY are not treated as being special. I'm not sure whether they should be or not. If you use wrap_inherited but classes change their inheritance tree at run-time, then very bad things will happen. VERY BAD THINGS. So don't do that. You shouldn't be doing that anyway. Mind you, you shouldn't be doing the things that this module does either. BAD PROGRAMMER, NO BIKKIT! If you find any other lurking horrors, please report them using <https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Sub-WrapPackages>. FEEDBACK
I like to know who's using my code. All comments, including constructive criticism, are welcome. Please email me. SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY
<http://www.cantrell.org.uk/cgit/cgit.cgi/perlmodules/> COPYRIGHT and LICENCE Copyright 2003-2009 David Cantrell <david@cantrell.org.uk> This software is free-as-in-speech software, and may be used, distributed, and modified under the terms of either the GNU General Public Licence version 2 or the Artistic Licence. It's up to you which one you use. The full text of the licences can be found in the files GPL2.txt and ARTISTIC.txt, respectively. THANKS TO
Thanks to Tom Hukins for sending in a test case for the situation when a class and a subclass are both defined in the same file, and for prompting me to support inherited methods; to Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsaker for help with the craziness for fiddling with modules that haven't yet been loaded; to Lee Johnson for reporting a bug caused by perl 5.10's constant.pm being Far Too Clever, and providing a patch and test; to Adam Trickett who thought this was a jolly good idea; and to Ed Summers, whose code for figgering out what functions a package contains I borrowed out of Acme::Voodoo. perl v5.10.1 2010-03-06 Sub::WrapPackages(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy