Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: V890 Benefits over V880
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users V890 Benefits over V880 Post 302092464 by jim mcnamara on Tuesday 10th of October 2006 06:17:57 AM
Old 10-10-2006
Q: does RoHS conformance add to the price - I would assume so. I'm in the US so we don't have anything like that codified.
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Installing Solaris 8 on a V890

Question, I have a new V890 preloaded witrh Solaris 10. Due to SW compatibility I need to run Sol 8 on the server. When running boot cdrom from the ok prompt, I get amessages looking for a location on the CDROM to find the startup install SW. The path must be different from what's on Sol 10 install... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: stocksj
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

What are some benefits of the UNIX hierarchical file structure?

What are some benefits of the UNIX hierarchical file structure? I am new to UNIX and researching some information about it for a class so please help if you can. Thanks. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: 88923JJJSDK
1 Replies

3. Solaris

HBA problem...? at SF V890

Dear All, I need your help. I have server like this SunOS 5.10 Generic_141444-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V890 with messages like this... Oct 10 17:07:52 iscsi: NOTICE: unrecognized ioctl 0x403 Oct 10 17:07:52 scsi: WARNING: /pseudo/fcp@0 (fcp0): Oct 10 17:07:52 Invalid... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mbah_jiman
4 Replies

4. Solaris

Solaris Volume Manger - Database Replicas Question - Benefits of Increasing Default Size?

Hey all! I was hoping someone knew anything about this one... I know with Solaris Volume Manager the default Database Replica size is 8192 blocks (4MB approximately) Now I know you can increase this amount but is there any point? The reason I am asking this is that I've setup mirroring on... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Keepcase
2 Replies

5. Solaris

v890 cannot boot

I just received a v890. I cannot get it to boot via CDROM nor can I access the SC prompt because I do not know the password. I am attempting to access it via serial cable to a Linux box. What is the best way to proceed? (25 Replies)
Discussion started by: LittleLebowski
25 Replies

6. Solaris

Could you run this benchmark? (Especially if you have a V880 or V890)

Hi all I am currently using a T5120 to write and run some simulation code I've been working on which heavily relies on large matrix multiplication procedures. I am posting this to call out for some of you run and share the results of a simple benchmark I've written to compare the matrix... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: toguro123
1 Replies
COMPAT(5)						      BSD File Formats Manual							 COMPAT(5)

NAME
compat -- manipulate compatibility settings SYNOPSIS
COMMAND_MODE=legacy|unix2003 #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE #define _DARWIN_C_SOURCE #define _NONSTD_SOURCE defined(__LP64__) #include <sys/cdefs.h> defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_UNIX_CONFORMANCE) DESCRIPTION
Setting the environment variable COMMAND_MODE to the value legacy causes utility programs to behave as closely to Mac OS X 10.3's utility programs as possible. When in this mode all of 10.3's flags are accepted, and in some cases extra flags are accepted, but no flags that were used in 10.3 will have been removed or changed in meaning. Any behavioral changes in this mode are documented in the LEGACY sections of the individual utilities. Setting the environment variable COMMAND_MODE to the value unix2003 causes utility programs to obey the Version 3 of the Single UNIX Specification (``SUSv3'') standards even if doing so would alter the behavior of flags used in 10.3. The value of COMMAND_MODE is case insensitive and if it is unset or set to something other than legacy or unix2003 it behaves as if it were set to unix2003. COMPILATION
Defining _NONSTD_SOURCE for i386 causes library and kernel calls to behave as closely to Mac OS X 10.3's library and kernel calls as possi- ble. Any behavioral changes are documented in the LEGACY sections of the man pages for the individual function calls. Defining this macro when compiling for any other architecture will result in a compilation error. Defining _POSIX_C_SOURCE or _DARWIN_C_SOURCE causes library and kernel calls to conform to the SUSv3 standards even if doing so would alter the behavior of functions used in 10.3. Defining _POSIX_C_SOURCE also removes functions, types, and other interfaces that are not part of SUSv3 from the normal C namespace, unless _DARWIN_C_SOURCE is also defined (i.e., _DARWIN_C_SOURCE is _POSIX_C_SOURCE with non-POSIX exten- sions). In any of these cases, the _DARWIN_FEATURE_UNIX_CONFORMANCE feature macro will be defined to the SUS conformance level (it is unde- fined otherwise). Starting in Mac OS X 10.5, if none of the macros _NONSTD_SOURCE, _POSIX_C_SOURCE or _DARWIN_C_SOURCE are defined, and the environment vari- able MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET is either undefined or set to 10.5 or greater (or equivalently, the gcc(1) option -mmacosx-version-min is either not specified or set to 10.5 or greater), then UNIX conformance will be on by default, and non-POSIX extensions will also be available (this is the equivalent of defining _DARWIN_C_SOURCE). For version values less that 10.5, UNIX conformance will be off when targeting i386 (the equivalent of defining _NONSTD_SOURCE). In order to provide both legacy and conformance versions of functions, two versions of affected functions are provided. Legacy variants have symbol names with no suffix in order to maintain ABI compatibility. Conformance versions have a $UNIX2003 suffix appended to their symbol name. These $UNIX2003 suffixes are automatically appended by the compiler tool-chain and should not be used directly. Platforms that were released after these updates only have conformance variants available and do not have a $UNIX2003 suffix. i386 ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- user defines deployment | namespace conformance suffix target | ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- (none) < 10.5 | full 10.3 compatibility (none) (none) >= 10.5 | full SUSv3 conformance $UNIX2003 _NONSTD_SOURCE (any) | full 10.3 compatibility (none) _DARWIN_C_SOURCE < 10.4 | full 10.3 compatibility (none) _DARWIN_C_SOURCE >= 10.4 | full SUSv3 conformance $UNIX2003 _POSIX_C_SOURCE < 10.4 | strict 10.3 compatibility (none) _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 10.4 | strict SUSv3 conformance $UNIX2003 ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Newer Architectures ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- user defines deployment | namespace conformance suffix target | ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- (none) (any) | full SUSv3 conformance (none) _NONSTD_SOURCE (any) | (error) _DARWIN_C_SOURCE (any) | full SUSv3 conformance (none) _POSIX_C_SOURCE (any) | strict SUSv3 conformance (none) ------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- STANDARDS
With COMMAND_MODE set to anything other than legacy, utility functions conform to Version 3 of the Single UNIX Specification (``SUSv3''). With _POSIX_C_SOURCE or _DARWIN_C_SOURCE for i386, or when building for any other architecture, system and library calls conform to Version 3 of the Single UNIX Specification (``SUSv3''). BUGS
Different parts of a program can be compiled with different compatibility settings. The resultant program will normally work as expected, for example a regex created by the SUSv3 regcomp(3) can be passed to the legacy regfree(3) with no unexpected results. Some cases are less clear cut, for example what does the programmer intend when they use the SUSv3 regcomp(3) to compile a regex, but the legacy regexec(3) to execute it? Any interpretation will surprise someone. Darwin June 30, 2010 Darwin
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy