Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Help using shred instead of rm Post 302080304 by Hitori on Monday 17th of July 2006 03:36:17 PM
Old 07-17-2006
why not just

find $TRASH/$1 -type f -exec shred -u '{}' \;
 

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

BASH : Find files by date and shred them

Good afternoon everyone, For security reasons, I need to delete files on a HDD I have to send after the ending of a demo. I need to find all the files which not end by ".log" and which have been created for 45 days. After getting the file list, I would like to use the shred command. It... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: cbismuth
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Shred utility

Hi experts. We have a HP-Unix server, we deleted some files and folders from the server. Is there any utilities that we can use to ensure those deleted files and folders are not recoverable? We used rm command to delete these files. Cheers, RT:confused: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: robtseng
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

shred multiple options

I've created a wxpython gui for the shred command. I can successfully mix and match all the shred options except two: -size and --random-source. (Man page definitions below). -size and --random-source seem to only work when they are used as the sole option passed. For example, I can zero a... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: codecellar
0 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

shred() not working on ext* file systems

When vfat format my128kb flash drive, shred works fine. But, when I format it using ext2 or ext3, shred() exits with this error: shred: /dev/sdb1: pass 1/1 (random)... shred: /dev/sdb1: error writing at offset 12288: Invalid argumentAnyone know what is going on? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: codecellar
0 Replies

5. BSD

Wipe out userland caches with shred, bleach bit is out of reach

Another topic that bothers me on bsd is the missing of bleach-bit. Looking at what bleach-bit can clean, the new version, it wipes out all the caches of the user. May someone can give me a hint how to clean the userland in bsd and all the hidden caches for the user. shred all rubbish or LSA cookies... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: 1in10
0 Replies
SHRED(1)							   User Commands							  SHRED(1)

NAME
shred - overwrite a file to hide its contents, and optionally delete it SYNOPSIS
shred [OPTION]... FILE... DESCRIPTION
Overwrite the specified FILE(s) repeatedly, in order to make it harder for even very expensive hardware probing to recover the data. If FILE is -, shred standard output. Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too. -f, --force change permissions to allow writing if necessary -n, --iterations=N overwrite N times instead of the default (3) --random-source=FILE get random bytes from FILE -s, --size=N shred this many bytes (suffixes like K, M, G accepted) -u truncate and remove file after overwriting --remove[=HOW] like -u but give control on HOW to delete; See below -v, --verbose show progress -x, --exact do not round file sizes up to the next full block; this is the default for non-regular files -z, --zero add a final overwrite with zeros to hide shredding --help display this help and exit --version output version information and exit Delete FILE(s) if --remove (-u) is specified. The default is not to remove the files because it is common to operate on device files like /dev/hda, and those files usually should not be removed. The optional HOW parameter indicates how to remove a directory entry: 'unlink' => use a standard unlink call. 'wipe' => also first obfuscate bytes in the name. 'wipesync' => also sync each obfuscated byte to disk. The default mode is 'wipesync', but note it can be expensive. CAUTION: Note that shred relies on a very important assumption: that the file system overwrites data in place. This is the traditional way to do things, but many modern file system designs do not satisfy this assumption. The following are examples of file systems on which shred is not effective, or is not guaranteed to be effective in all file system modes: * log-structured or journaled file systems, such as those supplied with AIX and Solaris (and JFS, ReiserFS, XFS, Ext3, etc.) * file systems that write redundant data and carry on even if some writes fail, such as RAID-based file systems * file systems that make snapshots, such as Network Appliance's NFS server * file systems that cache in temporary locations, such as NFS version 3 clients * compressed file systems In the case of ext3 file systems, the above disclaimer applies (and shred is thus of limited effectiveness) only in data=journal mode, which journals file data in addition to just metadata. In both the data=ordered (default) and data=writeback modes, shred works as usual. Ext3 journaling modes can be changed by adding the data=something option to the mount options for a particular file system in the /etc/fstab file, as documented in the mount man page (man mount). In addition, file system backups and remote mirrors may contain copies of the file that cannot be removed, and that will allow a shredded file to be recovered later. AUTHOR
Written by Colin Plumb. REPORTING BUGS
GNU coreutils online help: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/> Report shred translation bugs to <http://translationproject.org/team/> COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>. This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. SEE ALSO
Full documentation at: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/shred> or available locally via: info '(coreutils) shred invocation' GNU coreutils 8.28 January 2018 SHRED(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy