|
|
Sponsored Content
Top Forums
Programming
Problem with signals - 3 process communication
Post 302072450 by Nightwright on Wednesday 3rd of May 2006 04:58:04 AM
05-03-2006
It works!!!
Thanks for your advice. But it wasn't the only one problem there. There was also problem with the signal masks. I thought that every process has to create new mask to block signals, but it's enough to do this in the parent process.
(well, I'm not sure if this explanation is correct, but it works and I'm happy
)
Thanks for your advice. But it wasn't the only one problem there. There was also problem with the signal masks. I thought that every process has to create new mask to block signals, but it's enough to do this in the parent process.
(well, I'm not sure if this explanation is correct, but it works and I'm happy
)|
|
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
unix IPC
i would like to know the method of usage of semaphores on shared memory segments the topic seems very difficult to understand mainly when difrent proceses communicate instantly and how do i avaoid deadlock situation (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kamathanil
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
We have two Sun Sparc systems running on the xxx.xxx.1.xxx network and can be access fine by machines on that subnet. We are able the ping one of the machines from the xxx.xxx.2.xxx network, but we are not able to ping or communicate with the other machine on the (1) subnet from the (2) subnet.
... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: pyerj
8 Replies
3. Programming
signal in process communication:
I 'm a example in sun_unix that signal in process communication
It's here down but I only have freebsd in my machine.
how can i do the same in freebsd
eg:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int
main( void ){
void... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: a9711
2 Replies
4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
I am thinking about writing a log daemon for a multi-processed ksh application (yes - I know that high-level language would be a better option).
My question is as follows:
If many processes (many scripts) will try writing to a single log file:
print "message" > common.log
Will it work or... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: adderek
2 Replies
5. Programming
hello,
I am gettin problem while sending and recieving data through seial port...
when I am sending Data then the reciever end is not able to recieve that data .....
Reciever end is running in infinite loop just polling after some time to check that there is data on the port and then again... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: arunchaudhary19
9 Replies
6. Programming
i want to write a C chat program that communicates over IPC(inter process communication), that could be run using 2 seperate terminal windows within the same computer. so that wat u type in one terminal window , should appear on the other and vice versa...
could some one please help me with the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: localp
2 Replies
7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Too generic to post elsewhere, too advanced for the newbie forums. There are some applications within the unix/linux milieu that understand signals such as SIGHUP, etc as instructions to perform administrative tasks (clearing information out of this, disconnect users, etc.) I was just wondering if... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: thmnetwork
2 Replies
8. Programming
Hi All,
In my program i am handling SIGHUP signal. In the handler i fork and then exec on child process same binary file which is running. Parent process will die after 10 mins.
Now my child process which was exec with same binary file is not receiving SIGHUP signal. Below is the progran code:... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: sushil_shalin
6 Replies
9. Programming
Hello
I would like to create an application with communication between processes,
application tightly coupled, have you please an idea about an API or
a tool that allows me to generate such application?
Thank you so much (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: chercheur857
11 Replies
10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers
Hello and thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer me
I've been reading up on process signal calls (sighup, sigint, sigkill & sigterm) and I understand they all have different methods of terminating a running process. From what I've also read is a exit() actually terminates a process. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bodisha
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
sgetmask
SGETMASK(2) Linux Programmer's Manual SGETMASK(2) NAME
sgetmask, ssetmask - manipulation of signal mask (obsolete) SYNOPSIS
long sgetmask(void); long ssetmask(long newmask); Note: There are no glibc wrappers for these system calls; see NOTES. DESCRIPTION
These system calls are obsolete. Do not use them; use sigprocmask(2) instead. sgetmask() returns the signal mask of the calling process. ssetmask() sets the signal mask of the calling process to the value given in newmask. The previous signal mask is returned. The signal masks dealt with by these two system calls are plain bit masks (unlike the sigset_t used by sigprocmask(2)); use sigmask(3) to create and inspect these masks. RETURN VALUE
sgetmask() always successfully returns the signal mask. ssetmask() always succeeds, and returns the previous signal mask. ERRORS
These system calls always succeed. CONFORMING TO
These system calls are Linux-specific. NOTES
Glibc does not provide wrappers for these obsolete system calls; in the unlikely event that you want to call them, use syscall(2). These system calls are unaware of signal numbers greater than 31 (i.e., real-time signals). It is not possible to block SIGSTOP or SIGKILL. SEE ALSO
sigprocmask(2), signal(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.44 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2012-07-13 SGETMASK(2)