09-25-2002
You MIGHT get away with bringing the server down to single user and loading that patch. If that doesn't work, then a rebuild or restore. That's if it will even boot once you take it down. This might be one time you might try going from multi-user to single user without going down to the ok prompt. If the patch install package (or tar file) is on the server, then you have a chance of being able to install it possibly.
Nothing says this will work but it may be worth a shot.
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
Hi.
I'm trying to load red hat linux 7.2 on my machine so that I can learn how to use it. I'm having a very difficult time. I attempted to install it so that I can dual boot between linux and w2k. But now I can't boot up. I get a message saying that system32/hal.dll is either missing or... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: paulSF
4 Replies
2. Solaris
Hi. Can anyone offer any help on a corrupt agen.exe.
When I try to run agen.exe from shell I get the message "unrecoverable error occurred"
I am using a Sun Solaris machine with Solaris 3.6.
Where does the agen.exe reside ?
If I copy it from another working machine will it work ??? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: enzoli
2 Replies
3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
I have a solaris 5.8 system, it wont boot because /usr is corrupt, which means i cannot bring up fsck to run a disk check. Any ideas? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: frankkahle
3 Replies
4. High Performance Computing
Provides a description of how to set up a Solaris Cluster Express cluster in a VirtualBox on OpenSolaris.
More... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Linux Bot
0 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi,
Is it possible to have a Solaris cluster of 2 nodes at SITE-A using SVM and creating metaset using say 2 LUNs (on SAN). Then replicating these 2 LUNs to remote site SITE-B via storage based replication and then using these LUNs by importing them as a metaset on a server at SITE-B which is... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: dn2011
0 Replies
6. Filesystems, Disks and Memory
I've seen several posts that are similar to what I'm trying to do but no dice. I have a server (SunFire V215) that went belly up. I've set up a new one. I'm getting a corrupt label: wrong magic number error. Everything I'm seeing says label the drives, but if I do I'm afraid I'll lose the data... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: tnelson
0 Replies
7. Solaris
Problem occurs on one Solaris build. Every time we unzip the Jan CPU, there are several patches that error out (appears to be related to the GIF files). When we unzip the CPU on another Solaris build to a network storage area, we can execute without issue on the original machine.
Any ideas?
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: grahamr72
1 Replies
8. Solaris
Hi Gurus
I am not able to find the patching procedure for solaris 10 ( sol10 u11) to latest patchset with sun cluster having failover zones so that same I should follow.
Take an instance, there are sol1 and sol2 nodes and having two failover zones like sozone1-rg and sozone2-rg and currently... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: nick101
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUSE
patch-metamail
patch-metamail(1) General Commands Manual patch-metamail(1)
NAME
patch-metamail - Install a patch to the latest metamail release
SYNOPSIS
patch-metamail source-tree-root patch-number [hostname [dirname [prefix]]]
DESCRIPTION
The patch-metamail program will attempt to retreive a patch file for the metamail distribution, using anonymous ftp to a trusted server,
and then install that patch in your local copy of the distribution.
The first two arguments, which are required, are the root directory of your local copy of the metamail source directory, and the patch num-
ber. The former is site-dependent, the latter is patch-dependent.
In general, patch-metamail is intended to be called via metamail, with a mailcap entry like the following:
application/x-metamail-patch;patch-metamail source-tree-root %{patchnumber}; needsterminal
The default values for the host to ftp to, the directory name to retrieve the file from, and the patch file name prefix are hard-wired to
thumper.bellcore.com, pub/nsb, and "mm.patch.". While you can override these on the command line, it would be a big mistake to make these
parameterized based on the contents of a mail message, because then someone could spoof you into retrieving a new version of metamail with
a Trojan horse from their site! However, as long as you retain control over what host and directory the patches are retrieved from, this
program is reasonably safe (as safe as the host you're depending on, anyway).
SEE ALSO
metamail(1)
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 1991 Bell Communications Research, Inc. (Bellcore)
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this material for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies, and that the name of Bellcore not be used in advertising or publicity
pertaining to this material without the specific, prior written permission of an authorized representative of Bellcore. BELLCORE MAKES NO
REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE ACCURACY OR SUITABILITY OF THIS MATERIAL FOR ANY PURPOSE. IT IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
WARRANTIES.
AUTHOR
Nathaniel S. Borenstein, Bellcore
Release 1 patch-metamail(1)