Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Proper Forum Etiquette
Contact Us Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators Proper Forum Etiquette Post 27635 by tarballed on Wednesday 4th of September 2002 02:03:22 PM
Old 09-04-2002
Proper Forum Etiquette

I'm a frequent visitor to these forums. I generally enjoy topics that are posted as well as the responses. I really pickup a lot of new things to learn.

However, there is one thing that does bother me here. (I dont mean to start a flame war, or any problems at all, just expressing some thoughts)

Whenever I post, even before I post, I always research the issue as much as I can. I feel I learn better if I can actually try and figure my question on my own. However, if I cannot find the answer it is at that time I will post.

When I post, I try to be very specific, detailed and respectful. I feel that should be the correct way to post. I always start off with what im attempting to do and what steps I have done to try and resolve it on my own. In essence, I am polite and respectful in my posts.

What bothers me are these types of posts:

"Hey, how do you do this....?

bye"

I read this posts and cant help but get irritated. Did the person even attempt to research the issue? What about asking politely, being courteous and respectful? You cant help but question new threads that contain one line and end in bye.

Now im not saying that everyone needs to give a story before the post, but how about something more then "how do I do this? thanks." Maybe a little background info. A hint that maybe they tried to find the answer before they posted?

It just seems that everyone wants a quick answer and resolution. They dont want to take the time to try and figure out the problem on their own. It seems that laziness runs rampart in some, while patience and determination are non-exsistent.

I do enjoy helping people with questions. However, when I see those brief, "Give the answer now" posts, I cant help but ignore them.

I'm not trying to start a problem or negative thread here. That is not my intention. I do think that this forum as some top notched individuals who are very helpful and informative. It just bugs me at times when I see these type of posts.

Well, just wanted to get that off my chest.Smilie Like I said earlier, its not my intention to start any problems, just voicing my opinion.

Hope everyone is having a great day.

Tarballed

Last edited by tarballed; 09-04-2002 at 04:05 PM..
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

Proper routing

I have a series of new machines that are internet facing (have IP's that are accessible via the 'net) and it has internal facing interfaces. I need to be able to communicate back to the internal network to a specific server which processes monitoring and e-mail traffic. I've been told that I should... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: BOFH
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Proper use of prune...

My goal was to find any directories inside of any directory called "09_Client Original" not modified in the last 30 days. $ find /Volumes/Jobs_Volume/ -type d -name "09_Client Original" -exec find {} -mtime +30 -type d -maxdepth 1 \; The results of this find are passed along in a perl script... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: guriboy
1 Replies

3. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

Forum etiquette and contact information

I got the following message I tried to send the following reply:Please excuse me for not being more familiar with this forums conventions. I was not aware that I included a personal message. Please help me by: 1. So that I can avoid this problem in the future, please let me know what part of my... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: lmjennings44094
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Proper syntax

I'm new to Unix, and just had a quick question. I'm writing a bash script, and I was wondering what proper programming etiquette was for piping. How many pipes is too many pipes? OLDEST=$(find . -maxdepth 1 -type d -newermt 2012-07-01 ! -newermt 2012-07-30 | xargs ls -1td | tail -2) echo... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jrymer
1 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Forum Update: Disabled Home Page Forum Statistics for Guests (Not Registered)

Just a quick update; to speed up the forums, I have disabled the forum statistics on the home page for non registered users. No changes for registered users. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

Mobile: Advanced Forum Statistics to Forum Home Page

For mobile users, I have just added a "first beta" Advanced Forum Statistics to the home page on mobile using CSS overflow:auto; so you can swipe if you need to see more. Google Search Console mobile usability says this page is "mobile friendly" so perhaps this will be useful for some of our... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
12 Replies
JTB(1)							      General Commands Manual							    JTB(1)

NAME
jtb - syntax tree builder for JavaCC SYNOPSIS
jtb [options] inputfile DESCRIPTION
This manual page documents briefly the jtb command. JTB (Java Tree Builder) is a syntax tree builder and visitors generator to be used in front of JavaCC (Java Compiler Compiler). It takes a JavaCC grammar file as input (usually a ".jtb" file) and automatically generates the following: - a set of syntax tree classes based on the productions in the grammar, utilizing the Visitor design pattern; - four interfaces: IVoidVisitor, IVoidArguVisitor, IRetVisitor, IRetArguVisitor; - four depth-first visitors: DepthFirstVoidVisitor, DepthFirstVoidArguVisitor, DepthFirstRetVisitor, DepthFirstREtArguVisitor, whose default methods simply visit the children of the current node; a JavaCC grammar ".jj" file (jtb.out.jj by default), with the proper annotations to build the syntax tree during parsing (which then must be compiled with JavaCC). New visitors, which subclass any generated one, can then override the default methods and perform various operations on and manipulate the generated syntax tree. OPTIONS
-cl Print a list of the classes generated to standard out. -d dir "-d dir" is short for (and overwrites) "-nd dir/syntaxtree -vd dir/visitor". -dl Generate depth level info. -e Suppress JTB semantic error checking. -f Use descriptive node class field names. -h Display this help message and quit. -ia Inline visitors accept methods on base classes. -jd Generate JavaDoc-friendly comments in the nodes and visitor. -nd NAME Use NAME as the package for the syntax tree nodes. -np NAME Use NAME as the package for the syntax tree nodes. -ns NAME Use NAME as the class which all node classes will extend. -o NAME Use NAME as the filename for the annotated output grammar. -p NAME "-p pkg" is short for (and overwrites) "-np pkg.syntaxtree -vp pkg.visitor". -pp Generate parent pointers in all node classes. -printer Generate a syntax tree dumping visitor. -si Read from standard input rather than a file. -scheme Generate Scheme records representing the grammar and a Scheme tree building visitor. -tk Generate special tokens into the tree. -vd NAME Use NAME as the package for the default visitor classes. -vp NAME Use NAME as the package for the default visitor classes. -w Do not overwrite existing files. SEE ALSO
javacc(1) AUTHOR
jtb was written by the UCLA Compilers Group. This manual page was written by David Paleino <dapal@debian.org>, for the Debian project (and may be used by others). This manual page was updated by Ludovico Cavedon <cavedon@debian.org>. Jun 2010 JTB(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy