Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: win 2000
Special Forums Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions win 2000 Post 27571 by LivinFree on Tuesday 3rd of September 2002 09:59:13 PM
Old 09-03-2002
You're right. This is not the topic of any section of unix.com and break several of the forums "rules".

And remember - network access is a privelage, not a right. Don't abuse it for stupid reasons.
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Cybersecurity

Remote shell with Win 2000

I need to use the RSH command to run a shell script on my Unix box from Win 2000. I'm using the etc/hosts.equiv file for configuring Unix. In it I have the hostname and username as required. As a test, I enter the following on the Win 2000 dos command: rsh servername -l username df -k. The... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: ebergh
8 Replies

2. Programming

ftp a file from remote pc of win 2000

Hello. I am programming in C on HP-UNIX system,i want ftp a file from remote pc which is window 2000 system,i donot how config my HP-UNIX and pc, i donot how program in C or in shell. Thank you for help. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: bdyjm
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Win 3.1 OS

This is a bit diff. question in this forum but all of your's comments would be of great help to me. Problem is that I am using Win 3.1 version operating system on DOS. Here so many .tmp files get generated due to print commands. Can you suggest any utility which will delete all tmp files... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: vikasdeshmukh
3 Replies

4. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

win,unix

hi, Could anyone tell me mounting windows directories in unix.I have used mount command in all directions like mounting hd00,hd1,hd2,hd3 and so on but that don't work for me Mohan (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mohan
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Using Samba to join a win 2000 Domain

I am trying to set samba up to join my windows 2000 domain and I am having troubles If anyone if familiar with this help would be greatly appreciated I issue the following command # ./smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r DOMAINCONTROLER And the following gets returned load_client_codepage: filename... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: gennaro
4 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Freebsd and win 2000 working 2gether?

Hi Brothers, Please, I've just purchased a new PC and I would like to have both win 2000 and freebsd in the same hard drive, ( 40GB and 128Mb ) can you please help how to set up my new hard drive , please! Thank you..... aka Polymorphous (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Polymorphous
2 Replies

7. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Win 200

I have my little one of 7 years old running win 2000 the Spanish version and we need to reinstall the OS. One major problem, we have lost the case in which the os came in. Wich means we do not have the key code to reinstall. It took me a long time just to find the os in Spanish. I have been... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: franruiz
2 Replies
GIT-RERERE(1)							    Git Manual							     GIT-RERERE(1)

NAME
git-rerere - Reuse recorded resolution of conflicted merges SYNOPSIS
git rerere [clear|forget <pathspec>|diff|remaining|status|gc] DESCRIPTION
In a workflow employing relatively long lived topic branches, the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflicts over and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream). This command assists the developer in this process by recording conflicted automerge results and corresponding hand resolve results on the initial manual merge, and applying previously recorded hand resolutions to their corresponding automerge results. Note You need to set the configuration variable rerere.enabled in order to enable this command. COMMANDS
Normally, git rerere is run without arguments or user-intervention. However, it has several commands that allow it to interact with its working state. clear Reset the metadata used by rerere if a merge resolution is to be aborted. Calling git am [--skip|--abort] or git rebase [--skip|--abort] will automatically invoke this command. forget <pathspec> Reset the conflict resolutions which rerere has recorded for the current conflict in <pathspec>. diff Display diffs for the current state of the resolution. It is useful for tracking what has changed while the user is resolving conflicts. Additional arguments are passed directly to the system diff command installed in PATH. status Print paths with conflicts whose merge resolution rerere will record. remaining Print paths with conflicts that have not been autoresolved by rerere. This includes paths whose resolutions cannot be tracked by rerere, such as conflicting submodules. gc Prune records of conflicted merges that occurred a long time ago. By default, unresolved conflicts older than 15 days and resolved conflicts older than 60 days are pruned. These defaults are controlled via the gc.rerereunresolved and gc.rerereresolved configuration variables respectively. DISCUSSION
When your topic branch modifies an overlapping area that your master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream: o---*---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o master For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master o---*---o---+ topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o master The commits marked with * touch the same area in the same file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit marked with +. Then you can test the result to make sure your work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master. After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge commit +, and when your work in the topic branch is finally ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge +, in which case the final commit graph would look like this: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o---+---o---o topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it, which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges". As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on top of the tip before the test merge: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the commits marked with *. However, this conflict is often the same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you blew away. git rerere helps you resolve this final conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand resolve. Running the git rerere command immediately after a conflicted automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the usual conflict markers <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> in them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts, running git rerere again will record the resolved state of these files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of master into the topic branch. Next time, after seeing the same conflicted automerge, running git rerere will perform a three-way merge between the earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and the current conflicted automerge. If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written out to your working tree file, so you do not have to manually resolve it. Note that git rerere leaves the index file alone, so you still need to do the final sanity checks with git diff (or git diff -c) and git add when you are satisfied. As a convenience measure, git merge automatically invokes git rerere upon exiting with a failed automerge and git rerere records the hand resolve when it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand resolve when it is not. git commit also invokes git rerere when committing a merge result. What this means is that you do not have to do anything special yourself (besides enabling the rerere.enabled config variable). In our example, when you do the test merge, the manual resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the actual merge later with the updated master and topic branch, as long as the recorded resolution is still applicable. The information git rerere records is also used when running git rebase. After blowing away the test merge and continuing development on the topic branch: o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master $ git rebase master topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master you could run git rebase master topic, to bring yourself up-to-date before your topic is ready to be sent upstream. This would result in falling back to a three-way merge, and it would conflict the same way as the test merge you resolved earlier. git rerere will be run by git rebase to help you resolve this conflict. GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.5.3 01/14/2014 GIT-RERERE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy