08-23-2002
I agree that compilers are free to optimise the way they like.But i was surprised to see exactly similar behaviour for c and c++ respectively on VC++ ,Turbo,gnu,aCC compilers.
All changed value of constant in C compilation but the value remained same in C++ compilation.
similarly for array index being declared with constant.
Why all the vendors opted for such behaviour made me suspect if their is some standard.
shobhit
3 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Shell Programming and Scripting
is it possible to use eval to create constants in perl? i cannot seem to get anything to work, and my searches are turning up little to nothing. an example of what i am trying to do is this:
2 arrays:
array 1: 'FOOD','NUMBER','OS'
array 2: 'pizza','two','unix'
loop through the arrays and... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: effigy
5 Replies
2. Programming
This might be a silly question, but I thought I'd ask anyway. If I'm writing in C, isn't it more efficient to, for instance, use constant character variable set to 'A' instead of hard-coding a character 'A'? Since it's only a single character instead of a string, it might not matter much. (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: cleopard
10 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello there,
I'd like to define a variable b equal to 0.5/a where a=0.001, so I wrote something like that:
a=0.001;
let 'b=0.5/$a';
but it doesn't work... maybe because the variable a has a real value???
Any help will be appreciated!!!:D (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Giordano Bruno
1 Replies