Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Unix and Solaris differences
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Unix and Solaris differences Post 1450 by 98_1LE on Wednesday 7th of March 2001 01:50:46 PM
Old 03-07-2001
In short, UNIX is a generic term for several operating systems which have similar traits and a common background. Solaris is one "flavor" of UNIX.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Solaris Unix vs HP Unix, Could someone point out the major differences.

Solaris Unix vs HP Unix, Could someone point out the major differences. I have been performing Support to Solaris Unix for about 6 years, now I am interviewing for a HP Unix position. Could someone point out the major differences? Should it be an easy transition? Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Hack
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

SunOS Solaris Differences

Ok I have searched the archives but I don't seem to have a satisfactory answer for my questions. 1, What are the differences between the two in terms of kernel (I'm used to /stand for all) 2, What hardware do they run on? 3, Are they both platforms? A frustrated HP fan. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mattd
3 Replies

3. Solaris

Differences between Solaris 2.5 and 9

Hi Can anybody tell what are the great differences in Solaris 2.5 and 9? I am seeking information like differences in libraries, User Interface, Configuraion files, daemons, Packaging and archiving tools, Hardware supported etc. Please help me, as this is little urgent. Even if you can refer... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: charlcy
4 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Major differences between AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, Linux

Hi All, I want to know the OS level differences between AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, Linux Apart from the vendor, H/w and command differences, any other significant points. regards, guru Charan (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: gurukottur
9 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Bash differences on unix's

I am using bash on two different unix versions and for some reason the commands operate slightly differently. For example, 'ls * -la' gives me an error on one unix system, but works fine on a different system. The versions of unix are actually OS x and linux, and both systems are running GNU bash... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bongobonga
4 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Guide to differences between Solaris and AIX

I've been more used to Solaris, but am now working on an IBM AIX box, P650 Certain commands like "top" are no longer available. Any ideas on where I can find help on this matter? Christopher Freville Alberquerque, NM (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Solariums
6 Replies

7. Solaris

[Solved] SSH Query differences Solaris 9/10

Hi, I am trying to SSH without a password from a Solaris 10 box to a Solaris 9 box. I am not using root user but file permissions seem to be fine... Can anyone tell me why this might not be working?! I can successfully SSH without a password from the Solaris 9 box to the Solaris 10 box,... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mcclunyboy
0 Replies

8. Solaris

OpenSolaris, Solaris, Solaris Express - differences

What are the differences between these systems? I have to use Oracle's product but I do not know who to choose (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: PtaQ
3 Replies

9. Solaris

Differences of Solaris zone and Solaris Container

Hi everyone! I am in dire need to know what are the differences between a solaris zone and a solaris container.. Explanations over the net are very confusing. Please help. Thanks! (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: arah
8 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Comparing time differences between 2 Solaris servers

Good day to all. I'm relatively new in using the Sun Solaris OS. I would like to request your expertise in helping to solve a problem that I have at work. Not sure if this has been asked before but I have tried searching through the internet to no avail. Basically I have 2 sun solaris... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Fossil_84
8 Replies
URI::file(3)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					      URI::file(3)

NAME
URI::file - URI that maps to local file names SYNOPSIS
use URI::file; $u1 = URI->new("file:/foo/bar"); $u2 = URI->new("foo/bar", "file"); $u3 = URI::file->new($path); $u4 = URI::file->new("c:\windows\", "win32"); $u1->file; $u1->file("mac"); DESCRIPTION
The "URI::file" class supports "URI" objects belonging to the file URI scheme. This scheme allows us to map the conventional file names found on various computer systems to the URI name space. An old specification of the file URI scheme is found in RFC 1738. Some older background information is also in RFC 1630. There are no newer specifications as far as I know. If you simply want to construct file URI objects from URI strings, use the normal "URI" constructor. If you want to construct file URI objects from the actual file names used by various systems, then use one of the following "URI::file" constructors: $u = URI::file->new( $filename, [$os] ) Maps a file name to the file: URI name space, creates a URI object and returns it. The $filename is interpreted as belonging to the indicated operating system ($os), which defaults to the value of the $^O variable. The $filename can be either absolute or relative, and the corresponding type of URI object for $os is returned. $u = URI::file->new_abs( $filename, [$os] ) Same as URI::file->new, but makes sure that the URI returned represents an absolute file name. If the $filename argument is relative, then the name is resolved relative to the current directory, i.e. this constructor is really the same as: URI::file->new($filename)->abs(URI::file->cwd); $u = URI::file->cwd Returns a file URI that represents the current working directory. See Cwd. The following methods are supported for file URI (in addition to the common and generic methods described in URI): $u->file( [$os] ) Returns a file name. It maps from the URI name space to the file name space of the indicated operating system. It might return "undef" if the name can not be represented in the indicated file system. $u->dir( [$os] ) Some systems use a different form for names of directories than for plain files. Use this method if you know you want to use the name for a directory. The "URI::file" module can be used to map generic file names to names suitable for the current system. As such, it can work as a nice replacement for the "File::Spec" module. For instance, the following code translates the UNIX-style file name Foo/Bar.pm to a name suitable for the local system: $file = URI::file->new("Foo/Bar.pm", "unix")->file; die "Can't map filename Foo/Bar.pm for $^O" unless defined $file; open(FILE, $file) || die "Can't open '$file': $!"; # do something with FILE MAPPING NOTES
Most computer systems today have hierarchically organized file systems. Mapping the names used in these systems to the generic URI syntax allows us to work with relative file URIs that behave as they should when resolved using the generic algorithm for URIs (specified in RFC 2396). Mapping a file name to the generic URI syntax involves mapping the path separator character to "/" and encoding any reserved characters that appear in the path segments of the file name. If path segments consisting of the strings "." or ".." have a different meaning than what is specified for generic URIs, then these must be encoded as well. If the file system has device, volume or drive specifications as the root of the name space, then it makes sense to map them to the authority field of the generic URI syntax. This makes sure that relative URIs can not be resolved "above" them, i.e. generally how relative file names work in those systems. Another common use of the authority field is to encode the host on which this file name is valid. The host name "localhost" is special and generally has the same meaning as a missing or empty authority field. This use is in conflict with using it as a device specification, but can often be resolved for device specifications having characters not legal in plain host names. File name to URI mapping in normally not one-to-one. There are usually many URIs that map to any given file name. For instance, an authority of "localhost" maps the same as a URI with a missing or empty authority. Example 1: The Mac classic (Mac OS 9 and earlier) used ":" as path separator, but not in the same way as a generic URI. ":foo" was a relative name. "foo:bar" was an absolute name. Also, path segments could contain the "/" character as well as the literal "." or "..". So the mapping looks like this: Mac classic URI ---------- ------------------- :foo:bar <==> foo/bar : <==> ./ ::foo:bar <==> ../foo/bar ::: <==> ../../ foo:bar <==> file:/foo/bar foo:bar: <==> file:/foo/bar/ .. <==> %2E%2E <undef> <== / foo/ <== file:/foo%2F ./foo.txt <== file:/.%2Ffoo.txt Note that if you want a relative URL, you *must* begin the path with a :. Any path that begins with [^:] is treated as absolute. Example 2: The UNIX file system is easy to map, as it uses the same path separator as URIs, has a single root, and segments of "." and ".." have the same meaning. URIs that have the character "" or "/" as part of any path segment can not be turned into valid UNIX file names. UNIX URI ---------- ------------------ foo/bar <==> foo/bar /foo/bar <==> file:/foo/bar /foo/bar <== file://localhost/foo/bar file: ==> ./file: <undef> <== file:/fo%00/bar / <==> file:/ CONFIGURATION VARIABLES
The following configuration variables influence how the class and its methods behave: %URI::file::OS_CLASS This hash maps OS identifiers to implementation classes. You might want to add or modify this if you want to plug in your own file handler class. Normally the keys should match the $^O values in use. If there is no mapping then the "Unix" implementation is used. $URI::file::DEFAULT_AUTHORITY This determine what "authority" string to include in absolute file URIs. It defaults to "". If you prefer verbose URIs you might set it to be "localhost". Setting this value to "undef" force behaviour compatible to URI v1.31 and earlier. In this mode host names in UNC paths and drive letters are mapped to the authority component on Windows, while we produce authority-less URIs on Unix. SEE ALSO
URI, File::Spec, perlport COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1995-1998,2004 Gisle Aas. This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.18.2 2012-02-11 URI::file(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy