Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Sparc vs Intel performance
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Sparc vs Intel performance Post 11540 by LivinFree on Friday 7th of December 2001 05:45:13 AM
Old 12-07-2001
Yeah, it is kind of a loaded questions in a Unix forum...
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. News, Links, Events and Announcements

Announcing collectl - new performance linux performance monitor

About 4 years ago I wrote this tool inspired by Rob Urban's collect tool for DEC's Tru64 Unix. What makes this tool as different as collect was in its day is its ability to run at a low overhead and collect tons of stuff. I've expanded the general concept and even include data not available in... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: MarkSeger
0 Replies

2. Red Hat

Red Hat and Intel: Smart processors, virtualization boost efficiency and performance

On Monday March 30, Intel announced the availability of their much anticipated new line of processors, the Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500 series–nicknamed Nehalem. Red Hat, a long-time partner of the market-leading chip maker , collaborated on the chip’s debut, testing and optimizing the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Linux Bot
0 Replies

3. Solaris

How much better performance is ultra SPARC IV+ 1.95GHz than 1.35GHz?

Dear Guru, My boss has a plan to upgrade cpu of server so he needs to know how much better performance(percentage) is Ultra SPARC IV+ 1.95 GHz than Ultra SPARC IV 1.35 GHz?. I am looking for documentation to reference but I didn't see anything close to my point. If who know,... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: unitipon
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

can I emulate solaris/sparc on virtualbox? Or other emulator to run solaris for sparc in my win7 PC?

Hi Gurus can I emulate solaris/sparc on virtualbox? Or other emulator to run solaris for sparc in my win7 PC? regards, Israel. (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: iga3725
9 Replies

5. Programming

Padding issues between Sparc and Intel

Hello, I'm facing severe structure padding issues when my Solaris C/C++ application that runs on Sparc communicates with the same C/C++ application that runs on Intel. I know that Sparc and Intel use different padding patterns. So when it comes to reading the exchanged structure data, both... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: Goseib
11 Replies

6. Solaris

Running Solaris SPARC on Intel Hardware????

Hello friends, I hope everyone is fine and doing well. I want to learn Assembly language for SPARC architecture. Is there any emulator available for 64 bit SPARC on which one can install Oracle Solaris 11 SPARC version. And ofcourse on my intel laptop computer??? Thanks! (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: gabam
4 Replies
X86_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY(8)				      System Manager's Manual					 X86_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY(8)

NAME
x86_energy_perf_policy - read or write MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS SYNOPSIS
x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] -r x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] 'performance' x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] 'normal' x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] 'powersave' x86_energy_perf_policy [-c cpu] [-v] n DESCRIPTION
x86_energy_perf_policy allows software to convey its policy for the relative importance of performance versus energy savings to the proces- sor. The processor uses this information in model-specific ways when it must select trade-offs between performance and energy efficiency. This policy hint does not supersede Processor Performance states (P-states) or CPU Idle power states (C-states), but allows software to have influence where it would otherwise be unable to express a preference. For example, this setting may tell the hardware how aggressively or conservatively to control frequency in the "turbo range" above the explicitly OS-controlled P-state frequency range. It may also tell the hardware how aggressively is should enter the OS requested C- states. Support for this feature is indicated by CPUID.06H.ECX.bit3 per the Intel Architectures Software Developer's Manual. Options -c limits operation to a single CPU. The default is to operate on all CPUs. Note that MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS is defined per logical processor, but that the initial implementations of the MSR were shared among all processors in each package. -v increases verbosity. By default x86_energy_perf_policy is silent. -r is for "read-only" mode - the unchanged state is read and displayed. performance Set a policy where performance is paramount. The processor will be unwilling to sacrifice any performance for the sake of energy saving. This is the hardware default. normal Set a policy with a normal balance between performance and energy efficiency. The processor will tolerate minor performance compro- mise for potentially significant energy savings. This reasonable default for most desktops and servers. powersave Set a policy where the processor can accept a measurable performance hit to maximize energy efficiency. n Set MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS to the specified number. The range of valid numbers is 0-15, where 0 is maximum performance and 15 is max- imum energy efficiency. NOTES
x86_energy_perf_policy runs only as root. FILES
/dev/cpu/*/msr SEE ALSO
msr(4) AUTHORS
Written by Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> X86_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy