![]() |
|
|
grep unix.com with google
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Blog | Man Pages | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Our Members | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi there,
do someone have detailed information how to interpret the uptime command or rather which values can be called normal? (i know what the information means, but i have no idea if these values are ok or to high: 3:02pm an 13:53, 2 Benutzer, Durchschnittslast: 10,06, 12,05, 13,00) I hope that someone is in that topic and could tell me about it. thanks |
|
|||
|
My Problem is that i do not know how to interpret this values.
i know that they are standing for processes in the last 1, 5 and 15 minutes. but are these the active processes or the processes in the queue? For example there is a value 0.25 for the last 5 minutes. how would you interpret this? thanks |
|
|||
|
should this mean that a value of 15.97 show me a average load of 15.97%?
i canīt believe this because while the customers system displays me such a value the system had been very slow. (like the load of 98% on a windows system) daniel |
|
|||
|
The load average is not a percentage. It can be thought of as the number of processes waiting to run. So a load average of 0.25 means on average there is 1/4 of a process waiting to run, in other words most of the time none are waiting but a quarter of the time one is.
The 15.97 means on average there are about 16 processes waiting to run. If you have a medium to large multiprocessor box this might be ok. If it is a single processor box you'll have terrible performance. It depends on what the processors are as well. I've had a 12 processor Sun box with 400 mhz Ultrasparc II processors start slowing down at a load average of 20, while a 4 processor box with Ultrasparc III 1.05ghz processors ran fine with a load average of 30. So a rule of thumb like "load average of 2x number of procs" won't help much, you need to compare to your system's historical behavior. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| load average, performance |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DNS ENUM RR interpretation | smanu | IP Networking | 1 | 11-03-2007 01:33 PM |
| interpretation of sar | pascalbout | AIX | 0 | 03-01-2006 10:24 AM |
| SAR -b interpretation | jimthompson | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 3 | 10-26-2005 11:12 AM |
| uptime | xiamin | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 02-19-2003 04:51 AM |
| shell interpretation | PhilippeCrokaer | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 06-13-2002 02:06 PM |